BlueNirvana
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jun 2011
- Messages
- 2,632
but they said friday, but they said today, on and on and on we go :)Full verdict expected Wednesday at latest. Maybe later tomorrow.
but they said friday, but they said today, on and on and on we go :)Full verdict expected Wednesday at latest. Maybe later tomorrow.
That's from the club.but they said friday, but they said today, on and on and on we go :)
what the tomorrow/Wednesday thing ?That's from the club.
Defo as you suggested PB getting a form of words that suits both sides but leaves the reason for the verdict clear.Full verdict expected Wednesday at latest. Maybe later tomorrow.
That would not be right. If Ceferin wants reform, he needs ammo.Defo as you suggested PB getting a form of words that suits both sides but leaves the reason for the verdict clear.
Is it possible Colin that City may even trade some negative to UEFA detail for influence within its future procedures?
Yes.what the tomorrow/Wednesday thing ?
Good point.That would not be right. If Ceferin wants reform, he needs ammo.
Good point.
So you think the more damaging to UEFA the better at this stage?
If so do you think any of the media will change their view despite it being a less appealing message for the fans?
Yes, we've got them to consider as well if real reform is to happen.That rather depends how the European media view them, not just the UK view.
Yes, we've got them to consider as well if real reform is to happen.
Depends also on what our objectives are. Do we want to change or destroy from within. Our enemies need dealing with whichever way we choose.Far more so really, as the rest of the big clubs aren't fans of the PL. Who knows, internal national football politics may mean that the G14 aren't the only side to take.
That's from the club.
They said nothing more than what I posted but it doesn't matter really does it? The verdict is clear enough, even if the media and other fans don't want to take any notice of it.guesting the club are confident of yet more good news in the full fallout?
I dont think the media will change their mind, but Ceferin has to persuade the Uefa exec that, without changes, Uefa will lose the support of the majority of clubs that are not in the magic circle. To that end, City need to work within the ECA to persuade those clubs to agitate for reform and less influence for the G14.Good point.
So you think the more damaging to UEFA the better at this stage?
If so do you think any of the media will change their view despite it being a less appealing message for the fans?
Don't want to be a party pooper but I don't think it is quite time to be popping the champagne corks on this matter just yet. The MEN headline says critics could face action, and the article itself says 'the matter has now been referred to our legal team to see if there is a course of action we can take to redress the balance'. So i'm not getting too excited at the moment.About time, weve tried turning the other cheek and as with most bullies they will keep coming back always go for the ones who dont put up a fight.
I dont think the media will change their mind, but Ceferin has to persuade the Uefa exec that, without changes, Uefa will lose the support of the majority of clubs that are not in the magic circle. To that end, City need to work within the ECA to persuade those clubs to agitate for reform and less influence for the G14.
Pep Guardiola on #PL rivals' CAS involvement: “Opponents always deserve my respect and credit. I have all the respect for what Arsenal are on the pitch, not much off the pitch – but on the pitch, a lot.”
#ManCity believe Arsenal were the prime movers behind a joint letter sent by eight Premier League clubs to CAS, in which they argued that any attempt by City to delay a Uefa ban while their appeal was ongoing should be dismissed. [
@TeleFootball
The belief at #ManCity is that Arsenal and Liverpool were behind the plot. City also suspect they were involved in a group call between clubs to plan their next move after CAS had overturned the ban.