CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

[I'm With Stupid]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...pions-League-ban-court-case-against-UEFA.html

look at the fucking state of this

I love the line "More to follow."

What, you mean after you actually read the fucking report, you bell end?

Gotta get the clicks early. Never mind the actual facts.

 

[BringBackSwales]

Do we know why?

I was wondering why Simon Jordan’s dad didn’t withdraw

 

[Mike Cledford]

Made me chuckle

Yes l read that as:
'It's much too difficult for an ex fanzine contributor like me to understand but these three hate City and l desperately hope they can make up more lies up so l can agree fully'

Utter wanker.

 

[Barcon]

how city got “let off”

and how we “blatantly broke the principles of FFP”

oh and how we had 9 lawyers at the hearing as if that matters

Thanks mate. Fuck them. They sound like imbeciles.

 

[Mike Cledford]

Yes. When I think impartiality Tariq Panja and Rob Harris immediately come to mind.

Or not

 

[kaz7]

Props to soriano for giving that interview and being adamant we did nothing wrong,that was putting his reputation on the line,same with pep and khaldoon

 

[citizen_maine]

I'm gonna chance it and be lazy, just for now but if/when the likes of @Prestwich_Blue have read it and given their trusted summary can someone quote it and tag me?

I'm going to be equally lazy and say 'No'

 

[M12Blue]

@Prestwich_Blue
A majority of the (three person) panel felt that we had acted legitimately. I assume that means we won on a majority 2-1 decision. If UEFA's case was so flimsy, how can one panel member have supported them? I'd be surprised if the media didn't make something of this.

3-0 is a majority is how I see it

 

[Norbiton]

@Prestwich_Blue
A majority of the (three person) panel felt that we had acted legitimately. I assume that means we won on a majority 2-1 decision. If UEFA's case was so flimsy, how can one panel member have supported them? I'd be surprised if the media didn't make something of this.

That looks like it was on the question of whether the Etihad sponsorship was fair value and a related party or not that one of the panel dissented

 

[BringBackSwales]

@Prestwich_Blue
A majority of the (three person) panel felt that we had acted legitimately. I assume that means we won on a majority 2-1 decision. If UEFA's case was so flimsy, how can one panel member have supported them? I'd be surprised if the media didn't make something of this.

Cos they elected one of the 3 on the panel, as did we