I wish the club would take the kid gloves off. Do they not understand how pissed off us fans are over their inaction and the constant spew of lies shouted by the media who do it as they know we are a soft touch.
1) All directors an employees bar the match day squad and coaching staff/manager should not be welcome at our games against any of the teams who ganged up on us. No Hospitality, nothing. Ban them all from attending
2) Mail needs to be banned also
Or on the BBC websiteNothing whatsoever on Sky , I wonder why
I just don't understand how you can even word a rule about related parties. How many clubs in Europe are owned or part-owned by their sponsors? Most of the German league for starters. I mean how could Red Bull Leipzig seriously claim that their sponsor isn't a related party?That looks like it was on the question of whether the Etihad sponsorship was fair value and a related party or not that one of the panel dissented
We wouldn't give UEFA couple of documents because of all the leaks coming out of their camp,we gave it all to CASSo what exactly were we fined for? What or how did we obstruct?
There is nothing going on domestically
FA, PL already said they wouldn't do anything until knowing if we were guilty with UEFA's case.
For not participating in the original investigation, this is believed to be because UEFA are a bunch of cnuts and wouldn't give us a fair crack anyway. So we baited them into taking us to court and then turned them over. CITY!So what exactly were we fined for? What or how did we obstruct?
Wasn't I always?
Here you go BB.....Can someone post the gif of the guy with the tissues / cream ? opening up his laptop.
You'd hope (possibly incorrectly) that they're a bit more careful than the clickbait journalists that are currently writing about it. Perhaps even going so far as to actually read it before writing their stories.Or on the BBC website
So what exactly were we fined for? What or how did we obstruct?
These are reputable legal experts. I wouldn't expect them to vote in line with their 'sponsor', otherwise it defeats the purpose of letting each party choose a panelist. If they always vote for the side that elected them, CAS would stop this by choosing all members of the panel.Because one was a UEFA chosen one,we had our choice then there was a totally independent one
Its the Revie plan, all over again.For not participating in the original investigation, this is believed to be because UEFA are a bunch of cnuts and wouldn't give us a fair crack anyway. So we baited them into taking us to court and then turned them over. CITY!