CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

thor said:
Of the usual suspects who Ogdens mentions to provide “impartial” comment Marcotti is strangely quiet, Normally likes to get a sly dig in
Click to expand...
He did a terrible podcast with that little gobby French pundit trashing our not guilty verdict to pieces,they called us all sorts as well as cheats,especially Frenchy,they have nowhere to go I reckon
 
thor said:
Of the usual suspects who Ogdens mentions to provide “impartial” comment Marcotti is strangely quiet, Normally likes to get a sly dig in
Click to expand...

it took me hours to read that document, one would suspect Marcotti is intelligent enough to read it and digest it before commenting.

unlike those other bloody fools.
 
M12Blue said:
C helsea
U inted
N ewcastle
T ottenham
s
B urnley
A rsenal
W olves
L iverpool/Leicester

If only Sheffield United had joined in and Liverpool fell into the Irish sea
Click to expand...
Well what a set of tossers they look now !Just spent 45min.on the the BBC complaint website have asked for a reply but will be interesting to know how far they investigate things the more that complain with literate and concise facts then shortly they will have to investigate tlets hope thousands of us do it !
 
Haha.

KbqkIT6.jpg
 
Eds said:
I know my eyesight is failing but I am sure I read somewhere in the verdict that CAS mentions the fact that one of emails used as evidence was actually two emails doctored and made to look as one. Nick Harris suggests that isn’t the case and all emails were authentic. Am I going mad or is he, as I presume, being economical with the truth?
Click to expand...
Point 84
 
Uefa, the H9 (one's been added), the RDAHMeedya, fans of the H9: The evidence is overwhelming!

CAS: No it isn't.

MCFC: the evidence presented shows we are innocent of Uefa charges.

Funny how the the former bunch of wankers haven't found 'closure' on this matter! I fancy they will be slinging mud until the PL disappears up its own fundament.
 
PepInYourStep said:
I don't often do this but that BBC article has annoyed me enough to make a complaint. It's completely unacceptable that some bitter rag/dipper on their sportsdesk can get away with such a transparently biased article on a supposedly impartial public broadcast service and it's the main article no less.

If you also want to let them what you think
https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/complaints/make-a-complaint

Copy and paste this link into the text box for reference
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53571659
Click to expand...

submitted my complaint.

I would encourage every right minded city fan to do the same.
 
So the hateful eight was really the nasty nine. Well fuck them, they lost, we won. City were basically the old bloke refusing to cooperate with Harold Shipman. The BBC are a bunch of cuunts, they obviously expected us to lose, then it would have been Armageddon, instead they have to continue spinning half truths. Wankers.
 
Eds said:
I know my eyesight is failing but I am sure I read somewhere in the verdict that CAS mentions the fact that one of emails used as evidence was actually two emails doctored and made to look as one. Nick Harris suggests that isn’t the case and all emails were authentic. Am I going mad or is he, as I presume, being economical with the truth?
Click to expand...
EeBpIVmWAAEPUcP
 
I'm With Stupid said:
But all of that is so massively open to interpretation. Are the German clubs really getting fair value from their sponsors/owners? If so, why is their relative commercial income so much higher than any other league, even though their domestic league isn't viewed anywhere near as widely? Is Audi giving Bayern Munich €50-60m a year to not have their name on the shirt really fair value? And why in the Middle East is any other company from the same country accused of being a "related party," whereas with American owners, the sponsor can be owned by the best friend of the club owner and give them an unprecedented kit deal from a company that no-one ever fucking heard of (and has coincidentally now disappeared, proving what a great bit of marketing that clearly was), and that's just considered a good use of business contacts.
Click to expand...

Absolutely
 
PepInYourStep said:
I don't often do this but that BBC article has annoyed me enough to make a complaint. It's completely unacceptable that some bitter rag/dipper on their sportsdesk can get away with such a transparently biased article on a supposedly impartial public broadcast service and it's the main article no less.

If you also want to let them what you think
https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/complaints/make-a-complaint

Copy and paste this link into the text box for reference
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53571659
Click to expand...
I annoy the cvnts by wearing my Israel cap when I’m out and about in media city - they don’t seem to like it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top