CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

If it’s true about the new emails and if they were damaging to us, pretty sure they’d have been leaked in the days leading up to CAS, not two weeks after we’d been cleared
 
I can't be arsed with it all anymore i'm just concentrating on the football. We all knew this would never stop and no matter what the CAS finding it wouldn't be enough. In my mind the club did what it said it would do and took it to the top dogs and were vindicated. If they have a killer blow then they would have released it in the first round of leaks. Nothing is ever going to change, we are not liked and never will be by Clubs, Journalists and fans so fuck em they aren't worth the steam off our piss. If UEFA decide to have another go at making themselves look stupid so be it I am more than happy to leave it too our lawyers. Fuck them all I have more important things to worry about like arguing about why I think Ake is a good signing if he comes.
 
The 'problem' with Project is he's far too polite...

First they ignored him, then they laughed at him, then they tried to fight him.

Now a twunt like Harris attempts to cosy up and try to ingratiate themselves by asking for Project's legal take?

It appears it wasn't only City that won at CAS!!!

Perhaps he can kindly point Harris in the direction of the humble pie shop.
 
Cobwebcat said:
This isn't the way it works. Just get over it because what you are after will never happen. It would be nice but you might as well say let's run them over with my toy truck.
Click to expand...
12312314-1074719639099252.jpg
 
Citizen Green said:
Also backing up this is the fact that CAS said (iirc) they had seen the transactions and they didn't match the content of the alleged emails.

My only worry is is that these bastards will continue to leak things, hopefully the club's lawyers have covered every base and gone over all details before the award was made public.
Click to expand...
See below:

 
chaddblue said:
If it’s true about the new emails and if they were damaging to us, pretty sure they’d have been leaked in the days leading up to CAS, not two weeks after we’d been cleared
Click to expand...
Think it’s more of a case of them trying to discredit our defence now the official cas document has been published.
 
CAS inferred that certain emails had been amended or in Northern language fiddled with they will take little notice of this as City had original copies as they will have of these and UEFA will not want to get burned again !
 
If you've never tweeted Nick Harris. Please do it - don't abuse him. Just ask him a simple question and let him answer, then another, then another - the amount of time it's taking him to reply to all of these is so time consuming. We probably feel worn out from this case, imagine how he'll feel when all of this is for nothing.
 
Jacko1956 said:
CAS inferred that certain emails had been amended or in Northern language fiddled with they will take little notice of this as City had original copies as they will have of these and UEFA will not want to get burned again !
Click to expand...
No, I think Cas should just keep retrying the case until our wonderful press get the verdict they obviousy crave, meanwhile we'll just keep playing in the CL, ker-ching, thank you very much.
 
Manchester1894 said:
If you've never tweeted Nick Harris. Please do it - don't abuse him. Just ask him a simple question and let him answer, then another, then another - the amount of time it's taking him to reply to all of these is so time consuming. We probably feel worn out from this case, imagine how he'll feel when all of this is for nothing.
Click to expand...

If you try and engage with him and point out quite politely that he is wrong, he blocks you. The bastions of free speech in the media go straight into Blocking mode
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
The 'problem' with Project is he's far too polite...

First they ignored him, then they laughed at him, then they tried to fight him.

Now a twunt like Harris attempts to cosy up and try to ingratiate themselves by asking for Project's legal take?

It appears it wasn't only City that won at CAS!!!

Perhaps he can kindly point Harris in the direction of the humble pie shop.
Click to expand...
Trying to cosy up with Stefan because he hasn’t a clue what any of it means. Desperately needs his help as he’s actually worried about tweeting and looking a fool. It’s surprising because he’s had no issue with that before.
 
Notice how the press never pours over the minute details of any other sporting ruling? They barely print the result.

It's a smear campaign and I'm pleased to say that It's so on its last legs even we are getting bored by it.

To the Transfer forum!!!!
 
Tricky_Trev said:
Trying to cosy up with Stefan because he hasn’t a clue what any of it means. Desperately needs his help as he’s actually worried about tweeting and looking a fool. It’s surprising because he’s had no issue with that before.
Click to expand...
At least he’s asking questions. The likes of Evans, Delaney and McGeehan are far too arrogant to do that.
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
The 'problem' with Project is he's far too polite...

First they ignored him, then they laughed at him, then they tried to fight him.

Now a twunt like Harris attempts to cosy up and try to ingratiate themselves by asking for Project's legal take?

It appears it wasn't only City that won at CAS!!!

Perhaps he can kindly point Harris in the direction of the humble pie shop.
Click to expand...
Long term game and in their heart of hearts they know he is far more knowledgeable than they will ever be. The likes of Project and PB have shown throughout this whole process they understand this far better than the journalists. Project for me gives us a very balanced view of things and not one that is sugar coated from a city perspective and I think that’s needed. This latest email from DS had me going for a moment but actually when you take a step back and read projects interpretation of it, it really seems to support us in many cases rather than damn us.
 
willipp said:
Long term game and in their heart of hearts they know he is far more knowledgeable than they will ever be. The likes of Project and PB have shown throughout this whole process they understand this far better than the journalists. Project for me gives us a very balanced view of things and not one that is sugar coated from a city perspective and I think that’s needed. This latest email from DS had me going for a moment but actually when you take a step back and read projects interpretation of it, it really seems to support us in many cases rather than damn us.
Click to expand...
My reading of all this is CAS have been shown the transactions and they simply prove the allegations in the emails to be false, essentially making UEFA's argument impossible to prove.

As for Pearce, CAS acknowledged that he would have some influence over our sponsorship due to his role(s), but did not have the authorisation to complete financial transactions, affirmed by SM. None of the new 'leaks' change any of this.

You can argue that Pearce is saying he is paying £91m to Etihad to pay for City, but how this could be proved i don't know, and it can just as easily be argued that he could be directing the funding from one of the other AD institutes he is involved with as per the CAS release.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top