How was the CAS trial conducted?
Was each side present when the opposition presented their case or is there a chance UEFA don't know if it really was anything do with the 5 year limitation? In other words, that could have a been UEFA guessing until they know what City put forward. Also it gave them one last swipe at City by suggesting it was a technicality for the press to run with for a bit longer.
I get the impression quite a few things could have time barring on them. I think that maybe to do with the Aabar stuff that was according to David Conn in the 2014 agreement contract. They monitored us from 2014-2016. If it's the values they had a problem with and City's accounts were clear about everything, surely the time to raise any issues on the values, was during the time they were supposed to be monitoring us.