Harry Kane

[waspish]

City would never spend £200 million on a single player who is 27 years old (and injury prone)

Yep if we were spending that much you’d chuck it at PSG for Mbappe

 

[eastlandsblue]

I'd have Kane over Mbappe everyday. If we signed Kane, it would probably be his last and only move. So 5 yrs minimum at his highest level. With Mbappe, we'd constantly have the uncertainty of him wanting his dream move the Madrid

 

[toffee balls]

It’s a yes from me.
Takes our profile to a new level.

 

[MillsyTheMosher]

I'd have Kane over Mbappe everyday.

Hahahhahahahahahhhhahahahahah

 

[blue ranger]

Why on earth do people keep coming out with this bullshit. No player comes with a guarantee, ever.

Look at his domestic and international record. I’d say better guarantees with him than someone like Martinez from Inter.

 

[blue ranger]

It's obviously bollocks, we aren't paying £200m for anyone.

I would take him in a heartbeat though, anywhere around £100m and we should be all over it.

Agree with this.

 

[eastlandsblue]

Hahahhahahahahahhhhahahahahah

Explain, why its laughable

 

[ctid1894]

Look at his domestic and international record. I’d say better guarantees with him than someone like Martinez from Inter.

I don't care if he scores 7 million goals domestically or internationally, it doesn't make him a guaranteed success here. At best it limits risk to some degree, it most certainly doesn't and never will provide a guarantee.

 

[kun]

I'd have Kane over Mbappe everyday. If we signed Kane, it would probably be his last and only move. So 5 yrs minimum at his highest level. With Mbappe, we'd constantly have the uncertainty of him wanting his dream move the Madrid

I get your reasoning but Mbappé is already world class with so much room to grow while Kane is closing in on 30 and getting worryingly injury prone.
The risk of Mbappé doing a Sané would be worth it IMO, especially when you have the small chance of Mbappé leading the line for a decade or more.

 

[HaalandEffect]