It's Quiet thread 14 - 'do one' edition

Status
Not open for further replies.
cjn said:
Hazard was 28 for starters and is (was?) also a world class player who didn't just sit out full season because he blew out his knee. Also there wasn't a global pandemic/economic calamity going on.
Click to expand...

He was 28 & half Exactly.

Even with Economic calamity, 41m was spent on Ake ( Who I think is a good addition )
And Koulibaly value is more than 60m

Sane was/is/will continue to show that he is World class player as well.
 
Tevez City said:
29 years old Hazard with 1 year remain in his contract was sold for +100m

Therefore selling 24 years old Sane for 50m is not great deal at all.
Click to expand...

We've bought Raheem Sterling under similar circumstances for a similar fee to what we've sold Sane for. What is Raz's current market value? Raz is only a couple of years older
 
Last edited:
Tevez City said:
He was 28 & half Exactly.
Click to expand...
Ok so he was 28. In fact, you're 28 until you turn 29.
Tevez City said:
Even with Economic calamity, 41m was spent on Ake ( Who I think is a good addition )
And Koulibaly value is more than 60m

Sane was/is/will continue to show that he is World class player as well.
Click to expand...
Ake and Koulibaly both had/have more than a year left on their contracts, and they weren't just hurt for a whole season. These aren't comparable.

If you want an actual comparision, Ferran Torres was being quoted at 60-70m last year. This year, with a year left on his contract, we got him for 20 something.
 
Tevez City said:
29 years old Hazard with 1 year remain in his contract was sold for +100m

Therefore selling 24 years old Sane for 50m is not great deal at all.
Click to expand...
He was out for twelve month with an injury that might cause other injuries and he might have lost his speed,we did just fine considering
 
kaz7 said:
We don't sell our best players that is why ,sane is the only one we really didn't want to lose and we got our money back and more,our players that leave are older ones and we help them as they have helped us,why does this still need explaining
Click to expand...
1597376988701.png
 
domalino said:
Oh, he was shit in one game?

Fucking hell, sell the ****.

Maybe, and this is a bit out there, but bear with me, maybe he wasn't great because he'd only started 3 league games going into that December derby and just wasn't quite match sharp? And maybe having Stones mid-mental breakdown and Fernandinho still learning to play CB wasn't the ideal defence to be dropped into?

Just an idea. Probably a lot more likely than saying he can't play the position he's spent 90% of his career in though.
Click to expand...

Woah, nice sarcasm mate!
Its almost as if you’re so clever, youre cleverer than us less clever people.
How can I be as clever as you?

If Angelino was good enough for us, he’d have been kept around this season.

We had him for a few years - didnt work for him on loan, sold him.

He then plays a season at psv, plays exceptionally well, buy back.

Finally becomes a first team squad player for pep, is here for 6 months and was let go again.

I’m not saying he’s a bad player. Far from it, every time ive seen him play for RB in that wing back position he’s been one of the best players on the pitch.

But if he was good enough, he would still be our player. He is not good enough to play LB in a 4 for a team like ours. Thats my opinion. It also appears to be peps opinion, so maybe send him your next message.
 
DorisBlue said:
Woah, nice sarcasm mate!
Its almost as if you’re so clever, youre cleverer than us less clever people.
How can I be as clever as you?

If Angelino was good enough for us, he’d have been kept around this season.

We had him for a few years - didnt work for him on loan, sold him.

He then plays a season at psv, plays exceptionally well, buy back.

Finally becomes a first team squad player for pep, is here for 6 months and was let go again.

I’m not saying he’s a bad player. Far from it, every time ive seen him play for RB in that wing back position he’s been one of the best players on the pitch.

But if he was good enough, he would still be our player. He is not good enough to play LB in a 4 for a team like ours. Thats my opinion. It also appears to be peps opinion, so maybe send him your next message.
Click to expand...

I don't know if this is true or not.

Where Angelino is concerned, the only thing I am sure of, is that he has not been given a fair crack of the whip at City. He has never been so bad that he has deserved to be shunted out at the 1st opportunity.

If we are not buying a new LB this Summer, I would bring Angelino back and sell Zinchenko.
 
Tugay One Cup said:
It's never that straight forward though, is it?

Even if you're one of those people who thinks we never make mistakes, there are so many other variables.
Click to expand...

Its the fit.
Again not saying hes not a good player, and assuming we do sell this summer, he should command a big fee as his abilities deserve it.
But he does not fit our team.
If he did, but he was playing badly he would have been kept (like zinchenko this season).
 
DorisBlue said:
Woah, nice sarcasm mate!
Its almost as if you’re so clever, youre cleverer than us less clever people.
How can I be as clever as you?

If Angelino was good enough for us, he’d have been kept around this season.

We had him for a few years - didnt work for him on loan, sold him.

He then plays a season at psv, plays exceptionally well, buy back.

Finally becomes a first team squad player for pep, is here for 6 months and was let go again.

I’m not saying he’s a bad player. Far from it, every time ive seen him play for RB in that wing back position he’s been one of the best players on the pitch.

But if he was good enough, he would still be our player. He is not good enough to play LB in a 4 for a team like ours. Thats my opinion. It also appears to be peps opinion, so maybe send him your next message.
Click to expand...
Lots of variables, if zinchenko not been more versatile positionally than Angelino then may well have been zinchenko who went as Angelino probably offers more in offence.
Not everyone in a top side is a top player, this not good enough for us for a reserve player is a bit crass given where we’ve come from. Just my opinion, not a dig
 
DorisBlue said:
Its the fit.
Again not saying hes not a good player, and assuming we do sell this summer, he should command a big fee as his abilities deserve it.
But he does not fit our team.
If he did, but he was playing badly he would have been kept (like zinchenko this season).
Click to expand...
How is he not a fit for our team. He is an overlapping FB just as Mandy is
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top