PardonPrefer to refer to it as the Liverpool Echo Chamber.
PardonPrefer to refer to it as the Liverpool Echo Chamber.
......pardon. .....pard......pa....Pardon
The good news is it is on its last legs. Sales are reaching rock bottom.......pardon. .....pard......pa....
The swiss ramble has on twitter explained the reason why Liverpool dont spend any money
Could any one explain what is the difference from us and Liverpool. We have similar revenue.
How come we and Chelsea can spend money and they not unless they get money from player sale .
@Prestwich_Blue could you explain the difference.
Are our owners still putting money into the club.
The swiss ramble has on twitter explained the reason why Liverpool dont spend any money
Could any one explain what is the difference from us and Liverpool. We have similar revenue.
How come we and Chelsea can spend money and they not unless they get money from player sale .
@Prestwich_Blue could you explain the difference.
Are our owners still putting money into the club.
Please tell me you work for Dignitas!Some years ago my firm put an ad in the Echo amd we got lots of response. I seem to remember most were liverpool fans which l put down to coincidence.
It seems even then it was a magnet for plastic dipper fans.
If only Neil Armstrong would have had the presence of mind to utter the immortal words “This means more” as he stepped into the moon, he really could have made a name for himself.
The swiss ramble has on twitter explained the reason why Liverpool dont spend any money
Could any one explain what is the difference from us and Liverpool. We have similar revenue.
How come we and Chelsea can spend money and they not unless they get money from player sale .
@Prestwich_Blue could you explain the difference.
Are our owners still putting money into the club.
Fixed.From what SR said, and what I've seen, we simply generate more oil than they do. It's hard to be sure, as City don't publish their own oilflow statement (they only do it for CFG), but my guess is that we generate something like £150m free oil per year, whereas Liverpool would typically generate about £100m. They also have to repay debt owed to their parent company related to the building of the new main stand out of that, which is about £20m a year I think. So we have more oil to play with.
Regrettably no.Please tell me you work for Dignitas!
they should 'dub' over a small step for mankind with 'this means more'......If only Neil Armstrong would have had the presence of mind to utter the immortal words “This means more” as he stepped into the moon, he really could have made a name for himself.
Just like the Palace of Woe a complete lack of atmosphere.
Don't be giving them ideas.. I don't know what would be worse - one of them actually doing it; or the ensuing press/media revisionism that would attempt to try and convince the rest of us that Neil Armstrong did actually say that..!they should 'dub' over a small step for mankind with 'this means more'......
If only Neil Armstrong would have had the presence of mind to utter the immortal words “This means more” as he stepped into the moon, he really could have made a name for himself.
I bet Buzz Alrin wished he'd been walking alone!"You'll never walk alone" wasn't an option.
The swiss ramble has on twitter explained the reason why Liverpool dont spend any money
Could any one explain what is the difference from us and Liverpool. We have similar revenue.
How come we and Chelsea can spend money and they not unless they get money from player sale .
@Prestwich_Blue could you explain the difference.
Are our owners still putting money into the club.