west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 33,885
It's a country in the south Caucasus bordering Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan.Anyone heard anything about Georgia?
It's a country in the south Caucasus bordering Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan.Anyone heard anything about Georgia?
Again you seem to totally miss that I'm not arguing a point about the Supreme Court
That will be £10 well spent.Just put a £10 on Trump at 4:1. Hope that jinxs it for him.
Anyone heard anything about Georgia?
I don't agree with you on very much but I do think your points on the EC are important to consider. I believe the proportionate EC weightings are poor -- hence the disconnect between the popular vote and the EC vote (i.e. CA should be weighted higher, so should TX and FL as examples) -- but complaints about the overall system now miss historic shifts in colo(u)r from red to blue and vice versa as demographics and politics change.Well I can’t say I agree with that mate, having seen towns in Northern England with barely any investment, closed shops, fewer jobs, run down housing etc.
You have conflated protecting democracy with protecting the electoral college and supreme court.
Purposefully.
This is totally false. Poverty is in the big cities. A popular vote puts all votes on an equal standing where as the collage system gives some more weight than others. I'd be interested on any data but I'm 100% confident that the rural states are far wealthier per person than the coastal states with dense population and large inner cities.It’s right to point that out. Would a change to the popular vote change that? I don’t think it would. I don’t agree with you @Gaudion M, if these people’s votes don’t mean anything, which would be the case if the US switched to the popular vote, they would be damned to eternal poverty. You might disagree with their politics, but the only way to turn any of these states blue is to care for your fellow man.
Trump supporterHe meant every word. Did you miss the video?
“A key takeaway. Trump polled at least 3 million more votes in 2020 than 2016. His vote share has increased. Time to bury the idea his 2016 victory was a historical accident. A large swathe of the USA has read the fine print & clicked on the terms and conditions of his presidency.”
Just nicked that!! Quality lolMy fave post of the thread.
I guess a large percentage like what he has done with their economy, employment and wages especially for the low paid? All of which have improved under him. I guess many are also prepared to excuse his extreme character traits, my guess is if he wasn't such a colossal egotistical pillock he would have walked this election.“A key takeaway. Trump polled at least 3 million more votes in 2020 than 2016. His vote share has increased. Time to bury the idea his 2016 victory was a historical accident. A large swathe of the USA has read the fine print & clicked on the terms and conditions of his presidency.”
Definitely worth a punt, to be fair. It's definitely closer than that.That will be £10 well spent.
Surely VAR will be required to sort this out.
I’m not saying one is better than the other, but my simplistic understanding is that if the popular vote is the decider, surely candidates would just pander to the large coastal cities and ignore middle America. When in power, they’d surely put more resources in to the large coastal cities as they are the deciders for re-election. Am I wrong in this?
He will be a shoe in, if so, as he is from the red team........Surely VAR will be required to sort this out.