Political relations between UK-EU

[PannickAtTheDisco]

The difference is that some of the key players in the Brexit debate, such as Farage and many ERG members, supported those views.

Well I'm not sure how prominent religious leaders and members and speakers at Didsbury mosque, the presence of ISIS and the other terrorist groups backed by different regimes in the Middle East is much different to be honest. They allowed and propogated the spread of those views and in the same way Brexit has become the UK platform for the spread of right wing views in conjunction with Trump in the US. The public figures just aren't as widely publicised to a western audience.

 

[Len Rum]

His name is blacked out.

Not sure what that means, either he’s been perma banned or asked to be perma banned.

Thanks for the info.
Hopefully he'll be back and/or let us know he's ok.

 

[SWP's back]

Are the fish still happy?

 

[west didsblue]

Well I'm not sure how prominent religious leaders and members and speakers at Didsbury mosque, the presence of ISIS and the other terrorist groups backed by different regimes in the Middle East is much different to be honest. They allowed and propogated the spread of those views and in the same way Brexit has become the UK platform for the spread of right wing views in conjunction with Trump in the US. The public figures just aren't as widely publicised to a western audience.

I’m not saying you’re wrong about the analogy but it is whataboutery and has been discussed endlessly in numerous threads following terrorist attacks.
Glad you’re in agreement that Brexit became the platform for the spread of extreme right wing views.

 

[mcfc1632]

I wasn’t necessarily referring to the views themselves but Habib strikes me as a bit of an idiot.

Also, I am sure @mcfc1632 doesn’t claim to speak for all of those that wanted Brexit.

And I have not bothered to watch the video that was linked and being referred to - no interest in who Habib is or what he has to say

My concern today is - what I see as - the repeated exploitation of a tragedy to score cheap points on a football forum

 

[west didsblue]

Are the fish still happy?

The Sea Bass are. They’re still in the sea instead of being on the shelf at Aldi.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

The Sea Bass are. They’re still in the sea instead of being on the shelf at Aldi.

As long as you can still buy flippers, shuttlecocks and a faux fur throw from the middle aisle of Aldi, things will be ok.

 

[stonerblue]

Does it mean that the MP was killed because of the campaign?

Cox wasn’t even a prominent name in the remain campaign, she was very much a local MP and the man who murdered her was local.

He killed her because of her support for the local Muslim population, of which he detested.

I really don’t like this point, I think it’s using the tragedy.

He murdered her, in his tiny little mind, 'for Britain'. Also saying ''Britain come first''

 

[Saddleworth2]

No need to rub it in.

Halibut pisses over Hake. Especially FairIsle Halibut.

 

[BobKowalski]

As long as you can still buy flippers, shuttlecocks and a faux fur throw from the middle aisle of Aldi, things will be ok.

The middle aisle at Aldi is a treasure trove of wondrous delights...my cock has never been so shuttled as it is when rifling through the outside garden lights and socket sets.

 

[stonerblue]

And I have not bothered to watch the video that was linked and being referred to - no interest in who Habib is or what he has to say

My concern today is - what I see as - the repeated exploitation of a tragedy to score cheap points on a football forum

third time in 2 pages. And nobody has 'exploited' anything so far.

 

[Ban-jani]

He murdered her, in his tiny little mind, 'for Britain'. Also saying ''Britain come first''

I agree, but that can happen outside of Brexit and had nothing to do with the campaigning.

As I said earlier, the toxic atmosphere happened when parliament was stagnant on it.

 

[journolud]

And I have not bothered to watch the video that was linked and being referred to - no interest in who Habib is or what he has to say

My concern today is - what I see as - the repeated exploitation of a tragedy to score cheap points on a football forum

Maybe I’m being pedantic but I can’t see the point in you constantly referring to making a point or winning arguments on a football forum. We’ve all got City in common and I’m sure we all enjoyed the dippers defeat the other night for example. But this is a politics forum to which you contribute frequently. If you don’t want to engage in arguments on a “football forum” then stick to the match threads and referencing YNWA on the dippers thread

 

[Len Rum]

Are the fish still happy?

The demersal fish are very happy.
Not so sure about the Pelagics though.

 

[west didsblue]

third time in 2 pages. And nobody has 'exploited' anything so far.

Only one person exploiting it to win an argument by repeatedly pretending to try to dismiss the point due to sensitivities.

 

[mcfc1632]

Maybe I’m being pedantic but I can’t see the point in you constantly referring to making a point or winning arguments on a football forum. We’ve all got City in common and I’m sure we all enjoyed the dippers defeat the other night for example. But this is a politics forum to which you contribute frequently. If you don’t want to engage in arguments on a “football forum” then stick to the match threads and referencing YNWA on the dippers thread

I am comfortable in my own decision making - but thanks for your advice

Or is this just more intention from 'one side of the argument' to seek those supporting the UK leaving the EU, including the SM and CU to leave the thread?

TBF - you guys have done well on that front.

Just as an aside - this is generally the only topic on the sub-forum that I regularly post in. That is because on this forum - beyond being an 'irrational' CITY fan - I am also a strong supporter of the UK leaving the EU, including the SM and CU - and have been for many years.

I do not have 'deeper' involvements than that.

Others, particular key PKARs, are clearly political activists - and for them Brexit appears to be just another platform to pour out their prejudices

The point I make therefore is that - for me Brexit is of singular importance - for the activists - it is just another useful vehicle/platform

 

[mcfc1632]

third time in 2 pages. And nobody has 'exploited' anything so far.

See post #2,249

 

[journolud]

Only one person exploiting it to win an argument by repeatedly pretending to try to dismiss the point due to sensitivities.

I am comfortable in my own decision making - but thanks for your advice

Or is this just more intention from 'one side of the argument' to seek those supporting the UK leaving the EU, including the SM and CU to leave the thread?

TBF - you guys have done well on that front.

Just as an aside - this is generally the only topic on the sub-forum that I regularly post in. That is because on this forum - beyond being an 'irrational' CITY fan - I am also a strong supporter of the UK leaving the EU, including the SM and CU - and have been for many years.

I do not have 'deeper' involvements than that.

Others, particular key PKARs, are clearly political activists - and for them Brexit appears to be just another platform to pour out their prejudices

The point I make therefore is that - for me Brexit is of singular importance - for the activists - it is just another useful vehicle/platform

No

 

[stonerblue]

See post #2,249

Never noticed the post numbers before. Very handy though. Don't see that post as exploiting really. In fact you could say that you referencing it at least 3 times could be considered an attempt at point scoring. Speaking of which, back to footy for me

 

[bluethrunthru]