If Scudamore could say publicly that it’s good for the premier league for the scum and dippers to win it, just Imagine what goes on behind closed doors
As expected some serious arse licking,ratface isn't even starting yet all 3 are hanging out of his arse....Luke Shaw now lol
Wasn’t it Neville who first employed the ‘tactical fouling’ phrase? That’s certainly where I first recall hearing it used on Sky wrt Ferna
I see, so to be sure you dont think large scale organisations such as BT/SKY/BBC are organising bias but it maybe at a lower level between pundits or journalists etc?
Again it would not shock me if that was the case.
However, I often think, fans, think sports journalists have more, or should have more knowledge than they actually have.
Case in point being the Garth Crooks team of the week. Fans get annoyed player X is not in the team after he has had a blinder as if Garth Crooks has watched all 9 matches to make his assessment rather than just picked up a few papers, seen who has scored, assisted and cobbled a column together based on that.
Which takes me to my point. Instead of ‘collusion’ it could often be journalists reading articles by peers and following that thought process as it gains traction as a viewpoint.
Sam Lee was probably guilty of that with following his peers with regards the CAS ruling. I doubt he was ‘colluding’ in the sense that you mean, even though he reached the same opinion, but bowed to the knowledge of his peers and constructed his viewpoint based on that.
As humans we do it all the time. For example over the last week Liverpools failings upfront are being, linked, to the poor form of the fullbacks, and now its gaining traction.
The tactical fouling was probably something similar rather than a number of individuals sitting in a room inventing a narrative. Of course not helped by Arteta’s comment on the Amazon Doc or Rodris reported comments about tactical fouling,
Haha, you an adult capable of rational conversation.Thats it mate, post your social media gifs and leave the adults to have a mature discussion.
It's fair enough to mention the price tag but where is the context that we started five players who cost us virtually nothing namely: Foden, Garcia, Steffen, Zinchenko, Harwood-Bellis, and Doyle. To present information in such an unbalanced way is just dishonest.I don’t really give s**t about the commentators but when spurs played marine they never once mentioned the price tag of players - I counted 3 times last night with us
I think Scudamore referred to it as a 'strategic plan', and it was practically brushed under the carpet by everyone.That and also "Things are in place to ensure a fresh/new winner every six years"
What the fuck is that supposed to mean?
Why has the press not gone metal over that statement alone?
He should have been pressed mercifully to explain what that mechanism was.
It's comments above that fuel even the most relaxed and least paranoid fans.
This and the reluctance from the press to pursue it like they do with every negative tit bit about us.
I think Scudamore referred to it as a 'strategic plan', and it was practically brushed under the carpet by everyone.
We want to ensure Melbourne win the A-League ;)Since leaving the Premier League he was headhunted and championed by Simon Pearce
And his media mouthpiece Castles made sure the message was amplified in the mediaNo it was Maureen when at United. It used it before an upcoming game against us. He wanted to effectively take Fernandinho out of the game.
The pundits knew all teams did it, but chose to only highlight us doing it.
They obviously liked the cut of his strategic jib.Since leaving the Premier League he was headhunted and championed by Simon Pearce to provide a consultancy service to the A league in Australia. Clearly City had no issue with his statement or the bloke himself.
Exactly anyone would live to do it. Uou just need to do the interviews and the jobs yoursit's every Saturday night out the window but go on i'll give it a go for that
Since leaving the Premier League he was headhunted and championed by Simon Pearce to provide a consultancy service to the A league in Australia. Clearly City had no issue with his statement or the bloke himself.
Shaw’s transformation sounds positively Ireland-like.When it comes to the commentary wank fest the rags are certainly having the best of it. Could they blow anymore smoke up Shawes arse any they can spare they give Pogba.
Same ignorance about the first team ever to win the domestic treble just two seasons ago. Same ignorance about Liverpool being the best team over the last three seasons despite another team winning two titles in those 3 seasons.Why is there complete ignorance of the absolute dicking we gave United just a couple of weeks ago when commentators talk about their "fine form" ?
It took them 4 minutes to show why he screamed in the first place with a replay, with no acknowledgement that most people would scream when kicked in the chest.I also seem to recall Murphy slyly uttering out of the side of his mouth “he’ll be back up” when Torres got a heavy kick in the penalty area. And then he sarcastically commented about Torres “screaming”, fucking hell murphy you half wit what do you think about Mane and Salah?!