why would any "professional" journalist downplay the quality of product they are trying to sell to their audience? isn't that, in effect, downplaying his own worth?
What agenda thread? This is the media thread where we discuss the truth as reported by our beautiful media people.
View attachment 9324
They would have awarded Liverpool another trophy for that achievement.
All very positive stuff....
Cith beat West Brom. Aside from the five goals City only had one shot on target and apart from the other 40%, had just 40% possession.It’s also strange because he basically dismisses the goal, says we only had one shot on target but then cites other shots that prove that his assertion is wrong.
Not like the media to tie themselves up in knots reporting on City. Turning a positive into a negative is very much the reporting style.
That might have been the same reporter who gleefully announced "Liverpool turned on the style beating Tottenham..."Just listening to 606 from last night, the sport bulletin just said, and I quote, "Manchester City just did enough to ensure they'll remain top of the table for now"
For now?
The woman reading it out sounded fucked off when she said it.
Was a weird way saying we're top. Bitter cunts.
It will. But will only concentrate on white players....They are all as bad, unless the upcoming GB News has a sports section.
By agenda finder general Frank Sinatra.it was agreed years ago there was no agenda & it’s all in our heads...
But then, at the bottom of the report, he awards their goalie MotM. They just write shit piled on shite, not understanding that what they've written is full of inconsistencies at best or just total inaccuracies! You'd think that a national broadcaster, so covetous of its reputation, would produce something that matched what actually transpired.It’s also strange because he basically dismisses the goal, says we only had one shot on target but then cites other shots that prove that his assertion is wrong.
Not like the media to tie themselves up in knots reporting on City. Turning a positive into a negative is very much the reporting style.
Without any timings that’s just laughable. City scored and had another shot on target, then had no shots on target until they had two more.Simon Stone's match report on the Beeb
Aside from Gabriel Jesus' close-range strike from a Ferran Torres cross, an instinctive header from Bernardo Silva - created by a stray Oliver Norwood header - was City's only effort on target until Aaron Ramsdale denied Oleksandr Zinchenko and then Aymeric Laporte from the corner that followed.
What a weird sentence
The only thing I've seen is the 12 undefeated(?) games so that they could drag The Arse into the article.Anyone in the press/media reporting that City are the first team ever to win 9 straight games in a month ?
It's that bad with all the media I'm not sure if this actually happened or your just having a laugh.Anyone enjoying the Pep Milestone special this morning on Sky Sports. Absolutely eulogising over the unbelievable numbers he has posted on his managerial career and his time here in England.
Must be being awarded to that Scouse academy product Allison again surely..........Has Ederson won the golden glove yet?
Puts our media and pundits to shame.
ignores a couple of efforts in the second half by Jesus and Zinchenko and a header by Laporte? Not an easy game but we were in control and it was a professional display that incorporated half a dozen squad rotationsIt’s also strange because he basically dismisses the goal, says we only had one shot on target but then cites other shots that prove that his assertion is wrong.
Not like the media to tie themselves up in knots reporting on City. Turning a positive into a negative is very much the reporting style.
Stone was encouraging Blades players to dive in the BBC live text.Without any timings that’s just laughable. City scored and had another shot on target, then had no shots on target until they had two more.