The captain going down with the ship?
The captain going down with the ship?
I suspect a lot of those goals are penalties.
Can he score pens?!?! If so double the wage offer!!!!I suspect a lot of those goals are penalties. And for a side whose game revolves around Messi those assist figures are not great this season. You have to remember that La Liga is very polarised. Poor Barcelona and Real Madrid sides still dominate that league and plunder goals. What did you think of Real Madrid last season when we played them? A sub standard City beat them easily.
The problem with fans who dream about Messi plating for City is that they dream about the past and not the future. I watched the PSG game. It was the first game I have seen him play for a while and apart from a penalty he was completely ineffectual. I don't care if he's available on a free. It would be a bad move for club and player.
You sign Haaland to fill a need, not to stump a rival. Haaland fills a need.if we buy him it's for that purpose, not to gazump a rival.City gets Messi.
Liverpool gets Mbappe or United gets Haaland.
Who gets the better deal ? I guess it's not City. It's more important to sign Haaland to avoid him go to a rival.
Or city sign messi and haalandCity gets Messi.
Liverpool gets Mbappe or United gets Haaland.
Who gets the better deal ? I guess it's not City. It's more important to sign Haaland to avoid him go to a rival.
Or city sign messi and haaland
Not true, you sign Haaland or Mbappe and it's a dagger to the heart of your rivals, sign Messi and I honestly don't think our major rivals would feel the same as the two previously mentioned.You sign Haaland to fill a need, not to stump a rival. Haaland fills a need.if we buy him it's for that purpose, not to gazump a rival.
The Messi deal if it happens has always been said that it's seperate to all our other business.
As for United and Liverpool, I could give a rat's ass what they do in the market, cause regardless of what they do, with what we sign added to what we have we will still have a better squad then both.
Lol You are waffling. We sign a player we need not to put a dagger on our opponents. We need a striker for our team simple.Not true, you sign Haaland or Mbappe and it's a dagger to the heart of your rivals, sign Messi and I honestly don't think our major rivals would feel the same as the two previously mentioned.
Messi is in decline whatever anyone says, can be reinvent himself in a new league? that's the question, and a very expensive question.
We do your quite right but if we sign one of the most exciting young strikers for years it will piss a lot of our rivals off.Lol You are waffling. We sign a player we need not to put a dagger on our opponents. We need a striker for our team simple.
No - City do what's best for them....nothing else. leave that tactic to others and they end up with another sanchez situationCity gets Messi.
Liverpool gets Mbappe or United gets Haaland.
Who gets the better deal ? I guess it's not City. It's more important to sign Haaland to avoid him go to a rival.
Messi arrives and everyone is happy
No need for anyone else
Doyle replace Fern
Kun signs an extension
Sooner have HaalandMessi arrives and everyone is happy
No need for anyone else
Doyle replace Fern
Kun signs an extension
With a potentially ruinous answer..Not true, you sign Haaland or Mbappe and it's a dagger to the heart of your rivals, sign Messi and I honestly don't think our major rivals would feel the same as the two previously mentioned.
Messi is in decline whatever anyone says, can be reinvent himself in a new league? that's the question, and a very expensive question.
The big question , is he coming to play for Pep or play for City?With a potentially ruinous answer..
Me too but the only thing that gives me comfort is the guys running our club. They have proven time and again that they are nobody’s fools. If they go for Messi we can all be pretty confident that they have found a way to make it work both financially and on the pitch.The big question , is he coming to play for Pep or play for City?
Big difference and if it the former, I would leave alone.
Sooner have Haaland
We need a left back of Cancelo's quality
Doyle is miles off Dinho's level
Kun is very much a gamble now
I feel that if we sign the best player in the world, that improves the chances of signing top talent that would want to play with him. It would then be counterintuitive not to sign anyone else.
I would imagine currently we have a clearer run on Messi
Who is an equivalent LB to Cancelo?
Rodri is the new Fern though and Doyle could be the understudy
Kun could find a new found physical confidence with Leo around