Media Thread 2020/21

[JRockBlues]

The transfer spending over the last 10 years is pretty comparable between us and the rags. The difference is that we buy to a plan which includes personality profiling to see if they fit in with the squad. They buy for the name so they can sell more shirts.

 

[KS55]

Subtlety in play on BBC football page at the minute.

Main story "Champions League remains 'big one' for Man City"
Alongside "Life after Lewandowski - why Bayern could dominate Europe for years"
And "Real Madrid march into Champions League last eight"
And "Man City cruise into Champions League quarter finals"

My sub-editorial says "City play fancy football but will miss out on Champions League again as Bayern and Real Madrid are just too strong for them and will show who are Kings of Europe"


How different it would message with ...
"City power into last eight with class"
"Bayern searching for a solution after Lewandowski"
"Real Madrid overcome surprise team Atalanta"
"City turn on the style again"

If you want an antidote, read Henry Winter in weds Times. He has an orgasm of praise for us.

 

[r.soleofsalford]

Hi Pep, R Sole, Weatherfield Gazette, Are you disrespecting ickle Citeh's so-called greatest ever striker Kun Aguero by instructing his teammates NOT to pass to him during games?

?

 

[jaiguruKun]

On the BBC Champions League live reaction page they've (Mantej Mann) reposted this comment from last night:

View attachment 12609

This is a new level of vacuous stupidity. The inference being that money hasn't played a part in the strengh of anyone else's squad, only ours.

It's like a science forum publishing an insightful comment piece that oxygen forms part of the air in the atmosphere surrounding the UK.

 

[Man-chester copperpot]

On the BBC Champions League live reaction page they've (Mantej Mann) reposted this comment from last night:

View attachment 12609
They don't give in do they? It really is incessant. They never post comments about the money other clubs have spent.

Ha Ha Ha you will not believe this, i was bored at work this morning and commented on the Chelsea v Madrid game.
I honestly wrote (tongue in cheek of course)
“Congratulations Chelsea, nice to see another english team go through to the next round but lets be honest, with the money you have spent, you should be beating the likes of Atletico and should be winning the champions league - you have recently outspent everyone......or is the excuse only rolled out for Man City?”
20mins later i get this e-mail :
“
Dear BBC Visitor,

Thank you for contributing to the BBC web site.
Unfortunately we've had to remove the content below because it contravened one of our House Rules”
Ha Ha Ha what a joke

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Ha Ha Ha you will not believe this, i was bored at work this morning and commented on the Chelsea v Madrid game.
I honestly wrote (tongue in cheek of course)
“Congratulations Chelsea, nice to see another english team go through to the next round but lets be honest, with the money you have spent, you should be beating the likes of Atletico and should be winning the champions league - you have recently outspent everyone......or is the excuse only rolled out for Man City?”
20mins later i get this e-mail :
“
Dear BBC Visitor,

Thank you for contributing to the BBC web site.
Unfortunately we've had to remove the content below because it contravened one of our House Rules”
Ha Ha Ha what a joke

BBC message boards are monitored by the Rats at Media City, and they seem to have a very different approach to censorship, depending on whether a post is pro or anti City. It's blatantly obvious, and falls outside their own rules on fairness.

 

[bakerdave76]

Ha Ha Ha you will not believe this, i was bored at work this morning and commented on the Chelsea v Madrid game.
I honestly wrote (tongue in cheek of course)
“Congratulations Chelsea, nice to see another english team go through to the next round but lets be honest, with the money you have spent, you should be beating the likes of Atletico and should be winning the champions league - you have recently outspent everyone......or is the excuse only rolled out for Man City?”
20mins later i get this e-mail :
“
Dear BBC Visitor,

Thank you for contributing to the BBC web site.
Unfortunately we've had to remove the content below because it contravened one of our House Rules”
Ha Ha Ha what a joke

You should write the same one a city page and see what the do .

 

[waspish]

Ha Ha Ha you will not believe this, i was bored at work this morning and commented on the Chelsea v Madrid game.
I honestly wrote (tongue in cheek of course)
“Congratulations Chelsea, nice to see another english team go through to the next round but lets be honest, with the money you have spent, you should be beating the likes of Atletico and should be winning the champions league - you have recently outspent everyone......or is the excuse only rolled out for Man City?”
20mins later i get this e-mail :
“
Dear BBC Visitor,

Thank you for contributing to the BBC web site.
Unfortunately we've had to remove the content below because it contravened one of our House Rules”
Ha Ha Ha what a joke

did you ask what rule it was?

 

[deano ou812]

Ha Ha Ha you will not believe this, i was bored at work this morning and commented on the Chelsea v Madrid game.
I honestly wrote (tongue in cheek of course)
“Congratulations Chelsea, nice to see another english team go through to the next round but lets be honest, with the money you have spent, you should be beating the likes of Atletico and should be winning the champions league - you have recently outspent everyone......or is the excuse only rolled out for Man City?”
20mins later i get this e-mail :
“
Dear BBC Visitor,

Thank you for contributing to the BBC web site.
Unfortunately we've had to remove the content below because it contravened one of our House Rules”
Ha Ha Ha what a joke

Reply and tell them your considering scrapping paying for a tv license they are meant to be impartial they are anything but ..

 

[Man-chester copperpot]

did you ask what rule it was?

No mate, i’m not entertaining them anymore. F*ck em

 

[xgorton]

Who the fack is this Mark Goldbridge guy,rag coont says they did the trebble the right way but if we win the quadruple it would all have been bought and football would have been ruined.Goldbridge also likes a dig at our owners with a name like that I've just twigged,coont.

 

[KS55]

Ha Ha Ha you will not believe this, i was bored at work this morning and commented on the Chelsea v Madrid game.
I honestly wrote (tongue in cheek of course)
“Congratulations Chelsea, nice to see another english team go through to the next round but lets be honest, with the money you have spent, you should be beating the likes of Atletico and should be winning the champions league - you have recently outspent everyone......or is the excuse only rolled out for Man City?”
20mins later i get this e-mail :
“
Dear BBC Visitor,

Thank you for contributing to the BBC web site.
Unfortunately we've had to remove the content below because it contravened one of our House Rules”
Ha Ha Ha what a joke

I would complain. Clearly a red inspired ban, and not for the first time. Ask them what rule was broken.

 

[jrb]

He's already got 90,000 views, and 6000 likes, so another few views won't matter.

So here you are folks, Goldbridge, the Rag, the Youtuber, the clown, who constantly slags off the United team and the United players.

He's now decided to dress up and become a serious football pundit.

And his first topic is....'Are Manchester City Ruining Football'.

Just a few points of many that Goldbridge doesn't mention.

No mention by Goldbridge of United spending well over £1bill on players, constantly inflating the transfer market, paying the highest player wages, having the highest team and squad wages in the PL, and having a £650mill debt.

I'm sure Ric and the Mods will leave this on just to show what a f*cking liar, hypocrite, and bullshitter, amongst many other things, the Rag, Goldbridge is.

Get the popcorn out!

 

[FrankSwift1]

Ha Ha Ha you will not believe this, i was bored at work this morning and commented on the Chelsea v Madrid game.
I honestly wrote (tongue in cheek of course)
“Congratulations Chelsea, nice to see another english team go through to the next round but lets be honest, with the money you have spent, you should be beating the likes of Atletico and should be winning the champions league - you have recently outspent everyone......or is the excuse only rolled out for Man City?”
20mins later i get this e-mail :
“
Dear BBC Visitor,

Thank you for contributing to the BBC web site.
Unfortunately we've had to remove the content below because it contravened one of our House Rules”
Ha Ha Ha what a joke

You should write the same message on a City match report and see if it get removed. Would be clear evidence of bias if it does.

 

[Dirty Harry]

Who the fack is this Mark Goldbridge guy,rag coont says they did the trebble the right way but if we win the quadruple it would all have been bought and football would have been ruined.Goldbridge also likes a dig at our owners with a name like that I've just twigged,coont.

Is that the one who looks like the runt in a litter of Pugs, or the one that thinks he's Alan Partridge ?

Ah just seen the above, The Alan Partridge wannabe.

 

[Tommy_Catons_Perm]

Ha Ha Ha you will not believe this, i was bored at work this morning and commented on the Chelsea v Madrid game.
I honestly wrote (tongue in cheek of course)
“Congratulations Chelsea, nice to see another english team go through to the next round but lets be honest, with the money you have spent, you should be beating the likes of Atletico and should be winning the champions league - you have recently outspent everyone......or is the excuse only rolled out for Man City?”
20mins later i get this e-mail :
“
Dear BBC Visitor,

Thank you for contributing to the BBC web site.
Unfortunately we've had to remove the content below because it contravened one of our House Rules”
Ha Ha Ha what a joke

As others have said, write a similar report on a City report. Bide your time and pick a good opportunity just after City win a big game or prem league.

 

[KPXBLN]

He's already got 90,000 views, and 6000 likes, so another few views won't matter.

So here you are folks, Goldbridge, the Rag, the Youtuber, the clown, who constantly slags off the United team and the United players.

He's now decided to dress up and become a serious football pundit.

And his first topic is....'Are Manchester City Ruining Football'.

Just a few points of many that Goldbridge doesn't mention.

No mention by Goldbridge of United spending well over £1bill on players, constantly inflating the transfer market, paying the highest player wages, having the highest team and squad wages in the PL, and having a £650mill debt.

I'm sure Ric and the Mods will leave this on just to show what a f*cking liar, hypocrite, and bullshitter, amongst many other things, the Rag, Goldbridge is.

Get the popcorn out!

Goldridge is a pathetic bellend, but he's basically running a self-produced fan youtube channel. Of course he's biased! It's like moaning about Arsenal Fan TV being unfair to Spurs. Ignore it

 

[@BluePhil8]

As other’s highlighted in the United thread a Man United supporter’s group did an expose on this Mark Goldbridge and he’s actually a corporate stooge with some fucking boarding school name who supports Notts Forest or some shit.

 

[@BluePhil8]

Wish I was making that up, he’s a literal creation to milk YouTube ad revenue;

 

[ZanteWeatherman]

He's probably wondering just how good a person Mansour was in his last life.

Had me chuckling did that. It seems that Hoddle's past discretions seem to have magically disappeared into the ether.
Him and David Icke were a disgrace. How they got media time is beyond me. Hoddle is still getting it ffs.