He knuckled down afterwards and finished the season strongly and he had shown at Leicester he can be a key player in a title winning side (although it wasn't impressive trait to be honest and I wasn't that keen on signing Mahrez either). Since Mahrez joined he has performed well.You mean like Mahrez?
If true I'd have hoped for 70ish but who cares if we are getting the quality that I think he is.Been told tonight by an acquaintance that works for the agency representing Grealish a deal is done between 80/90 million, not sure myself because this guy is a bit of a romancer to be honest however it's a big statement to make
Seems an odd transfer to be the one to break our record when you think about itBeen told tonight by an acquaintance that works for the agency representing Grealish a deal is done between 80/90 million, not sure myself because this guy is a bit of a romancer to be honest however it's a big statement to make
Well, might not be the only one...Seems an odd transfer to be the one to break our record when you think about it
I agree to be honestSeems an odd transfer to be the one to break our record when you think about it
Of course he would rather be part of the rotation with us then starting every game at Villa. We also don’t know how much Pep would utilize him; could be a lot more than expected, like DiasHe won't want to take his turn on the Bench when we rotate players, or he wont like being hauled off early to rest players
So he won't want to play for a club that could win trophiesHe won't be signing for City.
He won't want to take his turn on the Bench when we rotate players, or he wont like being hauled off early to rest players
and earn significantly higher salary to boot.Of course he would rather be part of the rotation with us then starting every game at Villa. We also don’t know how much Pep would utilize him; could be a lot more than expected, like Dias
Disagree,he Absalutely loves City & would jump at the chance inc any rotating, at Villa he is No 1 at City his number will be called when Pep calls himHe won't be signing for City.
He won't want to take his turn on the Bench when we rotate players, or he wont like being hauled off early to rest players
Well that’s an odd thing to say (?) but it’s cool with me because I don’t want us to sign a player who ‘wants’ to take turns on the bench.He won't be signing for City.
He won't want to take his turn on the Bench when we rotate players, or he wont like being hauled off early to rest players
Please read the last sentence
Please read the last sentence
Yep I agree... With Haaland in our team, we become almost unbeatable, because on the rare occasion teams get through us, he will still outscore our oppositionIf a bank has to be broken (and torched if need to) then it has to be for the Norwegian HULK as an absolute priority to give us those extra 30-40 goals a season we are after (just imagine :)
A good price and great signing if true. A new option for that LM position aside from Gundogan. Foden still not at the level required for CM. LW is stack with Sterling, Jesus and Foden playing there so ideally Grealish should be for central position. This also frees Gundogan to cover Rodri when Fernandinho leaves.Been told tonight by an acquaintance that works for the agency representing Grealish a deal is done between 80/90 million, not sure myself because this guy is a bit of a romancer to be honest however it's a big statement to make
If that's true and we are also in for Haaland, it would have to mean we are going o have to sell one of our major players, there is no way we are spending 200m plus this summer.Been told tonight by an acquaintance that works for the agency representing Grealish a deal is done between 80/90 million, not sure myself because this guy is a bit of a romancer to be honest however it's a big statement to make