The Super League | FA + PL: New Charter & Fines | UEFA: Settlement

Would you be happy if City joined this European Super League?

  • Yes

    Votes: 109 5.3%

  • No

    Votes: 1,954 94.7%
  • Total voters
    2,063
KnaresboroughBlue said:
If the English clubs stay, then the TV rights would be similar and the SL will just replace the CL.
Click to expand...

Why ? I wouldnt be interested in watching a second string liverpool taken on a second string City or Utd . When in the super league I could watch a full strength liverpool play a full strength City.

Not that I would be watching anyway
 
LangleyBlue1970 said:
Do you think that every single decision/idea is some kind of ploy against us? Literally everything you post is as though everything is anti City. Your club is invited to a league formed from other super clubs from our nation and others. One of the elite. And all you can think about is how it is going to be another plot to topple us?

Really weird.
Click to expand...

Why do you think we've been invited? Do you really think they wanted to invite us? Some of these clubs have been railing against our ownership for years, they've never agreed with how we've been run.

The reason we have been invited is because a 'Super' League doesn't carry much weight if City (assuming we win the Premier League this year) aren't in it. Us not being invited would mean no champions of England, no champions of Germany and no champions of France. Not very impressive is it?

We're merely being used a pawn for reputational purposes to get the league up and running. Imagine City not being in it and Tottenham and Arsenal are with no promotion/relegation, people would see it as a joke.
 
manimanc said:
Don't they need 20 teams for their format of two groups of 10?
As it stands they are 8 shy. I hope everyone who wasn't asked originally fucks them off if they come crawling.
All this is because utd and liverpool are in debt and their nobhead American owners are fat greedy fuckers who think they are the top dogs.
Am absolutely seething that these cunts one way or another have ruined the English game and they've made every other **** jump into bed with them.
It was last October these rumours first surfaced and utd and liverpools names was the frontrunner of this new league forming.
I hate these red mardarse cunts a million times more than I did yesterday, they have ruined the beautiful game for each and everyone of us and if, and it's a big if, if it all goes tits up and it doesn't form then these two shithouse clubs need fucking from every angle.
Click to expand...
This is the biggest obstacle to stopping it if the national associations and UEFA stand firm on banning clubs imo.

Imagine the first year in they invite Lazio, Lyon, Everton, Wolfsburg and Ajax to be the first of the 5 rotating teams and it's a scenario where all 5 clubs know that they might only have a year in the ESL but they'll get a lengthy ban from their domestic leagues and UEFA comps, say 10 years? None will join and they won't have their 20 teams. There's nothing to lose financially for the 15 permanent members but there's an awful lot to lose potentially for the 5 temporary ones, they'll be gambling with the very existence of their clubs.
 
give it to gordon said:
Why ? I wouldnt be interested in watching a second string liverpool taken on a second string City or Utd . When in the super league I could watch a full strength liverpool play a full strength City.

Not that I would be watching anyway
Click to expand...
Because people will still watch those games just as they now watch both the PL and CL. I would expect us to try and win both.
 
LangleyBlue1970 said:
No, but they weren't embarrassed when we could overtake clubs who, at that point, were bigger than us because we could go out and buy whoever we wanted, throwing money at it for fun to get us in a position where we could compete, and now dominate?

I'm not just saying this now because of this announcement, but I have always wondered if the investment was how it looked from the outside, or if there was a more long-term plan. I think this is that. The SL plan has been rumoured for ages. Do you think Sheikh Mansour would not have been looking into this for a long term plan for his investment? I do.

People can't be happy at someone coming in and doing what he has done, completely wiping out the competition for the majority of honours in the process, then say they are embarrassed when we join a competition for the clubs we have wanted to be - the giants of the game in other words. One leads from the other, and for me personally I think this is what the plan was all along. It is extremely hypocritical to be ok with the first part, but then not want the second part. Can you imagine what fans of other clubs would say if fans of our club start harping on about turning their back on the club, after a decade of feasting on the fruits of the Sheikh's investment?how can you say its
Click to expand...

LangleyBlue1970 said:
No, but they weren't embarrassed when we could overtake clubs who, at that point, were bigger than us because we could go out and buy whoever we wanted, throwing money at it for fun to get us in a position where we could compete, and now dominate?

I'm not just saying this now because of this announcement, but I have always wondered if the investment was how it looked from the outside, or if there was a more long-term plan. I think this is that. The SL plan has been rumoured for ages. Do you think Sheikh Mansour would not have been looking into this for a long term plan for his investment? I do.

People can't be happy at someone coming in and doing what he has done, completely wiping out the competition for the majority of honours in the process, then say they are embarrassed when we join a competition for the clubs we have wanted to be - the giants of the game in other words. One leads from the other, and for me personally I think this is what the plan was all along. It is extremely hypocritical to be ok with the first part, but then not want the second part. Can you imagine what fans of other clubs would say if fans of our club start harping on about turning their back on the club, after a decade of feasting on the fruits of the Sheikh's investment?
Click to expand...
There is nothing wrong with having an owner who can provide a huge amount of money to boost a club to the next level providing there is a completion. Again I repeat the issue is that we are basically saying we are entitled bellends and now we have got to this level we should close the door to other teams who dream of having what happened to us, happen to them.
 
OntarioBlue said:
I read this morning that Sir Red Nose said he wasnt party to the decision. I thought he was a Director of United.


This decision must have been taken at Board level and must have been ratified by a Board vote.

I can only conclude 1. He’s lying or 2. He wasnt at the board meeting and they had a quorum sufficient to carry the vote.

It is entirely possible the owners only invited enough Directors to the meeting to form a quorum and didn’t invite those they thought would oppose the Vote.

I now expect he will do the honourable thing and resign. Btw, where’s his mate Bobby Charlton. Isn‘t he also a Director? He’s been very quiet.
Click to expand...
Bobby's not a well man, think he's got dementia so doubt we'll see him again.
 
Btw anyone planning a new club to bring the real City back - which I understand given this debacle - remember NOT to call it anything to do with Maine Road.

The Americans are risking the soul of football do not involve a US State.

MaIne Road was renamed that in Victorian times after the state of Maine from the original name of Dog Kennel Lane.

Dog Kennel City!
 
aguero93:20 said:
This is the biggest obstacle to stopping it if the national associations and UEFA stand firm on banning clubs imo.

Imagine the first year in they invite Lazio, Lyon, Everton, Wolfsburg and Ajax to be the first of the 5 rotating teams and it's a scenario where all 5 clubs know that they might only have a year in the ESL but they'll get a lengthy ban from their domestic leagues and UEFA comps, say 10 years? None will join and they won't have their 20 teams. There's nothing to lose financially for the 15 permanent members but there's an awful lot to lose potentially for the 5 temporary ones, they'll be gambling with the very existence of their clubs.
Click to expand...

They'd probably just recruit another 5 permanent clubs.
 
Gumzy97 said:
Click to expand...

Interesting, didn't have a problem taking 350k a week from the yanks at Arsenal whilst they were languishing in the europa and out of the top 4. If he bothered to turn up once a week he might have got his dream of playing in the CL more often.

Easy PR for the likes of Ozil this nonsense, is he still in bed with Erdogan? so much for his morals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top