Harry Kane

dave_blue12 said:
People should ask the question posed not some hypothetical question made up in their heads.
Click to expand...
What is hypothetical about it? The poll asks if you would like the club to sign Kane and some will obviously say no as they have a preference for Haaland.

The poll doesn't ask if you think Kane is a good player or would you sign him if there are no other alternatives.
 
p.taker said:
Because it's obviously highly correlated to Haaland. Signing Kane would mean we don't sign Haaland.
Click to expand...
But thats nonsense.

Show me where Haaland has agreed to sign for us but now Kane has come on the scene we are having second thoughts.

That's the equivalent of saying you don't want Grealish because that means we wont sign Mbappe.
 
Paulmcfc2703 said:
But thats nonsense.

Show me where Haaland has agreed to sign for us but now Kane has come on the scene we are having second thoughts.

That's the equivalent of saying you don't want Grealish because that means we wont sign Mbappe.
Click to expand...
The god damn polls were created at exactly the same time, hence people will view it as do you want to sign Haaland or do you want to sign Kane. It's not that difficult to figure out.
 
I'd rather us but a striker that knows the league inside out and has bagged a hat full consistently every season than someone who if we're honest did nothing over 2 games against us..premier League v bundesliga is a different gravy
 
p.taker said:
The god damn polls were created at exactly the same time, hence people will view it as do you want to sign Haaland or do you want to sign Kane. It's not that difficult to figure out.
Click to expand...
Then people need to read the 'god damn poll' properly.

No wonder we always fuck up public votes
 
dave_blue12 said:
People should ask the question posed not some hypothetical question made up in their heads.
Click to expand...

Maybe many did. I did. Either way, it is still a valid consideration, as is any alternative player that signing Kane would presumably prevent.

If you said, would you want Harry Kane signed, if he was the only player in the world, maybe the results would be different. A simple Yes No for me has to recognise other alternatives exist and could be preferable.
 
KennyG said:
He doesn’t go missing in big games either, in most big games, Spurs are the underdogs. Did you see the recent Spurs v Utd or the league cup final, he was feeding off scraps. He scores 30-40 a season here.
Click to expand...
You may well be correct in your final prediction, but extraordinary players make it happen for themselves. How many times have you seen Kane win a game basically by himself? I have seen Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, Mbappe, Neymar and Haaland do that, just to stick to those five. Messi has been in some tactically horrendous and disjointed Barcelona teams, and still turned up. They have won two La Ligas 90% on his back. You’d expect a great player to bring more than he did to a UCL final, for instance. I just want to remember one big game in which you can say, That win was Kane. Heck, even Lucas Moura AT TOTTENHAM delivered them an epic semifinal win away.
 
p.taker said:
What is hypothetical about it? The poll asks if you would like the club to sign Kane and some will obviously say no as they have a preference for Haaland.

The poll doesn't ask if you think Kane is a good player or would you sign him if there are no other alternatives.
Click to expand...

Do you want City to sign Harry Kane?

The answer is obviously YES

We have no idea if Haaland is even an option.

No wonder this country is in such a mess. People are incapable of clear thought
 
p.taker said:
The god damn polls were created at exactly the same time, hence people will view it as do you want to sign Haaland or do you want to sign Kane. It's not that difficult to figure out.
Click to expand...
Do you expect a celebration by some when the Yes inevitably surpasses the No? Lol
 
Coatigan said:
Maybe many did. I did. Either way, it is still a valid consideration, as is any alternative player that signing Kane would presumably prevent.

If you said, would you want Harry Kane signed, if he was the only player in the world, maybe the results would be different. A simple Yes No for me has to recognise other alternatives exist and could be preferable.
Click to expand...

It's a simple question. It doesn't mention alternatives and we don't know what other alternatives are anyway. Haaland has maybe set his heart on somewhere else, who knows ?

In the Haaland poll I have voted YES too. It's simple, just answer the question.
 
baggy said:
Reading between the lines of Pep's recent press conferences I wouldnt be totally surprised to see him leaving this summer.
Click to expand...
Sterling has been playing so poorly for some time now, I can’t see anyone wanting him especially as his transfer fee and wages would be prohibitive.
 
Pep makes every player better, give him Kane I think we will be looking at lewandowski numbers
 
applecentral said:
Sterling has been playing so poorly for some time now, I can’t see anyone wanting him especially as his transfer fee and wages would be prohibitive.
Click to expand...

It's just a dip in form. It happens. And he has been playing better lately. I'd wager he'd get back on track next season.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top