Ref Watch

Tbh if corruption was used just to get lfc and utd into the TOP FOUR then it's piss poor corruption. I mean why not make them win, anything? It just doesn't seem v likely.

The anger and frustration though.... Totally, it's getting to the point of switching off from football. They're literally ruining football with VAR just being there. All they've achieved is underlining their incompetence and randomness of decisions.

Fans/people want to feel assured by what they are watching and VAR is destroying that so much more than just "a ref getting it wrong " (pre VAR)

I disagree with your thoughts regarding the assistance for the rags and dippers but that it ok.

The only thing I am confident about is that things are not going to change anytime soon and games are going to be ruined by PGMOL's unchallenged influence.

They are the core of the shit shows we are having to witness.
 
Tbh if corruption was used just to get lfc and utd into the TOP FOUR then it's piss poor corruption. I mean why not make them win, anything? It just doesn't seem v likely.
The thing with corruption and fraud in general is that if you are too blatant/greedy your odds of getting caught are greater. If you were to take a couple of quid out of petty cash It's unlikely to be noticed, but if you took £100 it would be obvious straight away. If the Rag's had been gifted the title this season everyone would know it was bent.

It's a fine balance with betting scams. You want to choose a few games/races likely to have little or no significance, and then spread your betting out over them. Illegal syndicates have been doing this for years and it can be very difficult to detect. The rewards are huge. It's only when they are greedy they get caught.
 
I’d say it matters as there’s no way away fans (pre-COVID) can see how their team is being fucked over at that precise moment?

That's what I'm saying. The VAR replays in the stadium are next to useless. Controversial incidents don't get shown and there is no explanation, just the decision. A quick freeze frame shown for 2 seconds at maximum, no way to tell if you have been done over or not.
 
What is forgotten is that VAR pictures come from the TV companies. The TV producer and editor can selectively choose what shots are fed into VAR and there filtered through a controller as well as the VAR referee.

It is narrow minded to believe it is just about results and betting. Both valid but the real big money from collusion and corruption comes from media commercial sales and adverting. Beneficiaries of exciting or controversial football games are the PL, FA, FIFA, UEFA, TV companies, press, media, sponsors and advertisers from exposure and ratings.

Biggest losers are the fans and the game of football. Both are being cheated with delivery through referees and VAR. Sadly, many clubs are more interesting in exploiting football as a product with no interest in sport, as recently demonstrated with the EL debacle where none of the parties come out smelling of roses.
 
Wasn’t he the one that said it wasn’t a sending off on Jesus in the Leeds game then when he was he quickly backtracked, he is fucking useless.
In the Villa game he quoted the LOAF then later backtracked when he had time to re read it to say the decision was correct after a second reading .
 
The thing with corruption and fraud in general is that if you are too blatant/greedy your odds of getting caught are greater. If you were to take a couple of quid out of petty cash It's unlikely to be noticed, but if you took £100 it would be obvious straight away. If the Rag's had been gifted the title this season everyone would know it was bent.

It's a fine balance with betting scams. You want to choose a few games/races likely to have little or no significance, and then spread your betting out over them. Illegal syndicates have been doing this for years and it can be very difficult to detect. The rewards are huge. It's only when they are greedy they get caught.
Yeah agreed about greed exposing them. But then why do this with utd and lfc? Surely Brighton or West Brom would be more under the radar. It just doesnt add up, are they doing it for money or are they doing it to install utd back as champions?
 
Not really sure what showing or not showing replays in the ground for supporters has to do with the ref or VARs decision making.

The VAR replays for controversial moments at the Etihad have all seemed to consist of 30 seconds of the var logo followed by a ridiculous 2 second replay or freeze frame for offside which doesn't give anyone chance to actually see anything anyway. Pretty much pointless. Contentious decisions are not really shown at all.

As far as I'm aware Liverpool and Utd still have pitchside monitors for the ref?

Not showing replays on screens in the ground shows contempt for match going supporters who are less informed than anyone watching on tv.

Referees and officials cannot always see or make the correct decisions. VAR was meant to assist In critical or contentious situations or where there has been a clear mistake. In Rugby refs are miked and call out their decision and call for on screen evidence to prove or disprove it.

In football it is all smoke and mirrors. Clear and obvious errors are still made. Inconsistensies in applying the laws of the game continue. Worse is that changes to the laws and interpretations are being made on the hoof.

Liverpool and United have probably been the main beneficiaries of VAR. They are two of the richest clubs with two of the biggest capacity grounds in the Premier League. The question should be why these two football clubs are the exception by not having big screens in their grounds that can show replays when PGMOL and their referees only make token use of pitchside monitors?
 
Yeah agreed about greed exposing them. But then why do this with utd and lfc? Surely Brighton or West Brom would be more under the radar. It just doesnt add up, are they doing it for money or are they doing it to install utd back as champions?

you're mixing top down backing of Rags and Dippers remaining competitive and getting CL revenue with syndicates making money off the likes of Brighton/Palace etc. where they'd traditionally strike in the Saturday 3pm games nobody in the UK would be watching. You only have to look at the refereeing in some of those mid-table games nobody used to watch to see where they operate. 2 different things at play.
 
you're mixing top down backing of Rags and Dippers remaining competitive and getting CL revenue with syndicates making money off the likes of Brighton/Palace etc. where they'd traditionally strike in the Saturday 3pm games nobody in the UK would be watching. You only have to look at the refereeing in some of those mid-table games nobody used to watch to see where they operate. 2 different things at play.
So it's everywhere, everyone's at it? That's crazy talk considering city have just won the PL for the umpteenth time and in the CL. Unless someone has cheated on our behalf?
 
So it's everywhere, everyone's at it? That's crazy talk considering city have just won the PL for the umpteenth time and in the CL. Unless someone has cheated on our behalf?

I personally believe that your comments are niave but not wishing to argue. Those are you beliefs but I cannot accept them.

If City were denied the PL despite being so clearly superior to the competition, then the issue would be so blatant and obvious resulting in so much attention and exposure that a real issue would ensue. The PL daren't risk that kind of problem imo.

The rags and dippers rely upon the money from CL qualification , and the PL rely upon the money which comes to them from the rags and dippers being in the competition and boosting income revenues.

Sponsorship money for them both is linked to CL qualification so there is the vested interest explained without too much difficulty.

When the rags looked like they weren't going to qualify for a top 4 place a couple of seasons back, their penalties awarded suddenly increased. I don't believe that was a coincidence and previous comments from the PL hierarchy about " a successful MU being good for the PL " imo betrayed their hopes for the sake of future incomes.

PGMOL and their underlings form the vital cog in all of the above imo, and it is their influence and corruption which needs to be addressed and broken up, but will not be because of the money and influence that they bring.
 
I disagree with your thoughts regarding the assistance for the rags and dippers but that it ok.

The only thing I am confident about is that things are not going to change anytime soon and games are going to be ruined by PGMOL's unchallenged influence.

They are the core of the shit shows we are having to witness.
Are they the core though or are they under instruction? Premier League I think lays down some markers they would like to see from each season. I am sure there is fairly regular dialogue between those that run the PL and Pigmol.

Its unfortunately an unholy cycle of media influence on PL, PL influence on PIGMOL, PIGMOL influence on games to achieve the outcomes the media wants. All down to money.

Why does no journalist pick Pep up on his oft repeated mantra 'we win and nobody GIVES US ANYTHING we do it ourselves'. What do they think he means by that? They pick him up on every other bloody word he utters to get a headline but not that.

And yes, I know we have won loads but that is despite this shit show not because of it. It means we need to be 20% better than the other teams and we are/have been for long stretches. Why are we so hated? Because of that.
 
I personally believe that your comments are niave but not wishing to argue. Those are you beliefs but I cannot accept them.

If City were denied the PL despite being so clearly superior to the competition, then the issue would be so blatant and obvious resulting in so much attention and exposure that a real issue would ensue. The PL daren't risk that kind of problem imo.

The rags and dippers rely upon the money from CL qualification , and the PL rely upon the money which comes to them from the rags and dippers being in the competition and boosting income revenues.

Sponsorship money for them both is linked to CL qualification so there is the vested interest explained without too much difficulty.

When the rags looked like they weren't going to qualify for a top 4 place a couple of seasons back, their penalties awarded suddenly increased. I don't believe that was a coincidence and previous comments from the PL hierarchy about " a successful MU being good for the PL " imo betrayed their hopes for the sake of future incomes.

PGMOL and their underlings form the vital cog in all of the above imo, and it is their influence and corruption which needs to be addressed and broken up, but will not be because of the money and influence that they bring.
If I understand correctly, PGMOL comes under the auspices of the Premier League whilst previously all referees and officials were appointed and allocated by the FA.

This beggers the rhetorical question of "Why the change?"
 
Are they the core though or are they under instruction? Premier League I think lays down some markers they would like to see from each season. I am sure there is fairly regular dialogue between those that run the PL and Pigmol.

Its unfortunately an unholy cycle of media influence on PL, PL influence on PIGMOL, PIGMOL influence on games to achieve the outcomes the media wants. All down to money.

Why does no journalist pick Pep up on his oft repeated mantra 'we win and nobody GIVES US ANYTHING we do it ourselves'. What do they think he means by that? They pick him up on every other bloody word he utters to get a headline but not that.

And yes, I know we have won loads but that is despite this shit show not because of it. It means we need to be 20% better than the other teams and we are/have been for long stretches. Why are we so hated? Because of that.

I can only assume that decent journalists ( Martin Samuels for instance ) are concerned about the influence which could be brought to bear and thus severely influence their income etc.

When the ref ( sorry my memory for names is shit ) told the media that he had been told to change his report by PGMOL , he was dismissed as crank or liar iirc.

I believe he also lost his pension award .

That I presume is the kind of influence which means that the shit show is allowed to continue.
 
I certainly wouldn't know how to go about setting up a concerted challenge to PiGMOL by supporters of all clubs in the PL who believe there is corruption being used to influence the outcomes of games for whatever reasons, but I believe that would be necessary to even stand a chance of bringing about any kind of reform.

My opinions and thoughts are too easily dismissed as being wrong , stupid and the work of a utter crank - my wife would definitely support that view .

But PiGMOL are the paid faciltators of the motives and interests of the PL.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top