They aren’t taking bets due to the neville interview. They said it was a conflict of interest and have closed the market. odds on to sign him at paddy power not that it means much
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
If you’re starting a discussion, then, I’d be happy at £100m.I was starting a discussion about the price, look back since I asked it, people are discussing it without being bitchy about it, like you.
At £120m I’d think we had our pants taken down.
How about you?
If we are to look at this logically there's no way we haven't given him the encouragement to make his statements and following that logic we will have come up with a number that works to make the deal happen.
The rest will be the usual pantomime that comes with most transfers with lots of posturing from the selling side before a deal is struck a day before the window closes.
The rest will be the usual pantomime that comes with most transfers with lots of posturing from the selling side before a deal is struck a day before the window closes.
Regardless of if it works out or not, we’ll get shit from outside.Oh i agree, i'm hoping he'll make it.
Spending huge money scares the shit out of me because all signings are a gamble, even if we think Kane might be the real deal. But if it doesn't come off then we'll be getting ridiculed from everyone.
He scores loads and wins everything - bought the league, oil money.
He flops and they’ll be taking the piss.
Goes with the territory that (don’t care)
At £80m-£100m I can see it, but I believe it’ll be close to the £120m being talked (speculated) about, then I’d pass, especially if there’s addons on top of either £100m or £120m.If you’re starting a discussion, then, I’d be happy at £100m.
At £120m I’d think we had our pants taken down.
How about you?
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Or the third shit possibility: the “RVP scenario”. He joins some hated rival and makes the difference.Regardless of if it works out or not, we’ll get shit from outside.
He scores loads and wins everything - bought the league, oil money.
He flops and they’ll be taking the piss.
Goes with the territory that (don’t care)
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 14,533
I would be very surprised.I do not know the answer and clearly the media has Haaland and Kane as the front runners, but i would not be surprised if Pep did not buy a striker and ran with Jesus and Torres up front?
Money aside. It takes a while for players to adjust to Peps style of play. City do not play to a striker who has to adapt to a wider role like Sergio had too.
It could cause resentment and change the dynamic in the dressing room if Kane was seen to be paid more and treated differently to other performing players. The preference seems to be to buy and develop younger potential players who will be rewarded when they establish and prove themselves.
I see the sense in bringing in Kane as a proven top goalscorer but at what cost? Levy at Spurs may see Kane as a cash cow but if no-one will pay the asking price then it could be a big problem for them having a player who does not want to be there, who costs them big wages and whose value is decreasing by the year. It will be interesting to see how it pans out.
It could cause resentment and change the dynamic in the dressing room if Kane was seen to be paid more and treated differently to other performing players. The preference seems to be to buy and develop younger potential players who will be rewarded when they establish and prove themselves.
I see the sense in bringing in Kane as a proven top goalscorer but at what cost? Levy at Spurs may see Kane as a cash cow but if no-one will pay the asking price then it could be a big problem for them having a player who does not want to be there, who costs them big wages and whose value is decreasing by the year. It will be interesting to see how it pans out.
salfordbluetrue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jul 2013
- Messages
- 4,318
And if someone turned round to you and said `if we win nothing, he ends up injured for the full 3 years the FA stick in a wages cap and we can not move anybody out would it be good business` I do not know what the future holds but i recon there is more chance he is going to utdIf it wins us 4 straight titles and a couple more trips to the Champions League Final it's excellent business. It probably opens up more avenues for revenue too.
I personally think it'll be around £100m.
samuelyeboah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 May 2021
- Messages
- 6,878
- Team supported
- Manchester City
they were suspended because the interview was done by skybet and they don't wanna make it seem like they were actively trying to get people to gamble for/against something with an interview.Betting suspended on sky regarding Kane’s next club. Probably because of his comments regarding KDB
I said help, I didn't say fixThe media hate everything City, him signing won’t change that.
In fact I’ll be shocked if he’s still treated the same the way after joining “oil money” City.
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
Kane at 120m on a 4 year contract would be the equivalent of signing Bony or Ings every year for the next 4 years.See I genuine reply to a genuine question.
Every transfer has risks & the only worry is with who ever we sign if they get a major injured we end up in a similar situation to Sergio sitting on the sidelines.
This season we have grounded out results with the false 9 and spending £65m on Dias is now looking an absolute steal. We have struggled to score if we go behind & having a proper threat would take the pressure off Kev & others
He certainly looks like the best chance we’ve had for a long long while.In the striker stakes,we have had so many false dawns,we are well over due the real deal.
If he’s joining the squad full time next season we’ll find out soon enough.
salfordbluetrue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jul 2013
- Messages
- 4,318
So would i:) but this is Pep.I would be very surprised.
Honestly can't see any scenario where utd are favourites to sign him after the noises being made over the last few days.And if someone turned round to you and said `if we win nothing, he ends up injured for the full 3 years the FA stick in a wages cap and we can not move anybody out would it be good business` I do not know what the future holds but i recon there is more chance he is going to utd
Everything points to City. Even if it fails to materialise I don't know how you can reach the conclusion utd have more chance.
IrishBlueSince92
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2016
- Messages
- 3,858
Sounds like Kanes mad to sign for us
The negative of it is if we do get him Haaland is likely to end up at the rags
The negative of it is if we do get him Haaland is likely to end up at the rags
His numbers now though are him as a focal point of a Spurs team, their main man.Have you seen how many chances we spunk up the wall?
I think he'd be getting 35/40 goals a season.
That’s why on balance I don’t think he’ll score a lot more, more goals scorers for us and against packed defences will play a part.
He’ll also play less.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Name me any PL club who hasn`t bought shit.Clubs don`t buy shit for the sake of it as many footballers can`t settle into a new environment or play to a system they`ve never played in.No obviously, but we’ve bought the wrong players at the wrong prices before.
Doesn’t make the people running the club idiots, but some of their transfer buys aren’t perfect either.
Only the best survive others fall by the wayside.And not just at City.
If we`ve bought shit then we`ve done very well out of it over this past decade.
Love the way some keep on saying that Levy holds the cards...
The contract probably has a clause stating that if Spurs don't qualify for the Champions League he can go for a minimum fee. Even if that does not exist, no club wants a player whose heart is not in it and especially when they can get a chunk of money in return.
The longer this saga goes on the worse Spurs look in my opinion. The fact that Kane has not said anything on social media or with an interview this week says everything.
The contract probably has a clause stating that if Spurs don't qualify for the Champions League he can go for a minimum fee. Even if that does not exist, no club wants a player whose heart is not in it and especially when they can get a chunk of money in return.
The longer this saga goes on the worse Spurs look in my opinion. The fact that Kane has not said anything on social media or with an interview this week says everything.
OccupiedPalestineBlues
Well-Known Member
Sounds like Kanes mad to sign for us
The negative of it is if we do get him Haaland is likely to end up at the rags
There are no guarantees that he‘d transform them into a super trophy winning monster club - they got Martial when he was being touted as the best attacking prospect ever - and look at what they got out of him.