No one knows what the fee is. There are no quotations by club officials in the public domain and the media exagerate everything to do with Manchester City spending. The only thing that looks likely is that City paid a release-clause because VIlla were powerless to turn down the bid. So what was that set at? We don't know. The most quoted figures are either £75m, or £75m rising to £100m but there is no point an agent agreeing a release clause unless it can be exercised by a number of clubs. If you're targeting MCFC and you know their record fee is £65m, you don't see that release clause at £100m so I suspect the fee could be lower than what's been rumoured.
Who is kicking off?Why is everyone kicking off about us spending 100million when United have spent more than that this transfer window so far yet nothing has been said? It doesn't matter if it's on 2 players rather than 1. It's still more money spent.
Chelsea are on the verge of getting Lukaku for 100million plus and I've hardly heard anything said about that either. It's madness.
Why is everyone kicking off about us spending 100million when United have spent more than that this transfer window so far yet nothing has been said? It doesn't matter if it's on 2 players rather than 1. It's still more money spent.
Chelsea are on the verge of getting Lukaku for 100million plus and I've hardly heard anything said about that either. It's madness.
City ruining football again. We're a fucking nightmare.Who is kicking off?
Sorry yes i dont disagree, but in my opinion he packed the defence because of his lack of top level coaching ability.I'd say playing 2 DM's and picking wide players and sole attacking CM for their supposed work rate over attacking ability is defence minded.
Great shout mate.Why is everyone kicking off about us spending 100million when United have spent more than that this transfer window so far yet nothing has been said? It doesn't matter if it's on 2 players rather than 1. It's still more money spent.
Chelsea are on the verge of getting Lukaku for 100million plus and I've hardly heard anything said about that either. It's madness.
Who is kicking off?
The media. I know it's nothing new and to be expected but it doesn't make it any less frustrating.Of whom do you speak of sir?
If it's media, well nowt new is it
They’ll be on blue moon mate!I would love to see what’s actually on their screens. Probably ordering a Domino’s. Or watching something properly depraved on Pornhub
Yes. One step beyond.Why is everyone kicking off about us spending 100million when United have spent more than that this transfer window so far yet nothing has been said? It doesn't matter if it's on 2 players rather than 1. It's still more money spent.
Chelsea are on the verge of getting Lukaku for 100million plus and I've hardly heard anything said about that either. It's madness.
I think he’s got a very decent one, the git.You need a life.
I've got talksport on now, and I've not heard anything negative about the fee, infact Chunky O'Hara said it's the fee needed for someone of that talent. Onto Kane, nothing negative about the fee. The only negative i've heard on this station is Sinclair, but that's more about economics at present rather than the actual fee.The media. I know it's nothing new and to be expected but it doesn't make it any less frustrating.
Everywhere I turn it's "ridiculous money" "ruining football".
Completely different narrative for us.