Not really the point I was making, of course negotiate but you don't go in low balling. According to Romano we offered £100m. Which is nowhere near what Spurs expect. ApparentlyNever bought an Aston per se, but that's how I've always bought new cars. You pay list price?
Nice try, but you're overlooking one thing... the car dealer HAS to sell the car, so will be inclined to offer certain incentives (ie; mud flaps, rubber mats etc) to get the buyer to commit to a purchase.Never bought an Aston per se, but that's how I've always bought new cars. You pay list price?
SPURS may have to sell if their finances are as bad as reported - bluffingNice try, but you're overlooking one thing... the car dealer HAS to sell the car, so will be inclined to offer certain incentives (ie; mud flaps, rubber mats etc) to get the buyer to commit to a purchase.
Spurs don't HAVE to sell Harry Kane, so why move from their expected price?
It's like my house... According to a valuation report, it's worth (say) £400,000, but I won't accept a penny less than £500,000. I don’t need to sell it, I'll just wait until a buyer offers what I want.
None of the PL clubs have really suffered badly compared to the rest of the Europe. Look at how the rest of the PL has spent so far this summer. Plus there's rumours about Spurs funds coming from a naming rights deal for their stadium.SPURS may have to sell if their finances are as bad as reported - bluffing
How many times do I have to explain....?SPURS may have to sell if their finances are as bad as reported - bluffing
We’re never getting away from the barbs but it does show everything is legit.Hmm, it's still quite snarky and not entirely accurate, especially re: the ownership model.
You could be describing the red mardarses there.How many times do I have to explain....?
Businesses manage debt over a period of time. There's no way that Spurs are under any more than expected 'pressure'. The only negative factor is covid - something that every business has been affected by, and that all banks have agreed to take into consideration for loans etc
They aren't under any more pressure to pay back loans. That's a fallacy peddled by the hard of thinking.
Yes but they've also got to take into account an offer of £100 million plus just won't happen again. He may have 3 years left on his contract but his value will reduce significantly over time. This is their one and only chance of some serious money for him and the player himself wants to move too. Only one outcome in my own personal opinion.But to them, with 3 years on his contract to run and them hoping they can sort it out that he stays, why would they sell for £100m when he's worth more to them than that. They aren't going to just bend over, lube up and present to us.
Lukaku is going for near £100m and Kane is a better player.
Depends what we pay, don’t think anyone ever thought we’d pay less than £120 mill though . £120 plus add ons has been fairly accepted by most of us. Which is fine.At the start of the summer we were debating whether he was worth 100m. 120m, you were mad to even suggest that, that it would be asked let alone that we would pay it. We were going to land our man, it was going to be for nowhere near 120m, that was just a high figure kane haters used to claim high price.
Now we are debating whether he can be got for 150 or 160m. And generally think if we get him for that including addons we'd have done well.
,
And really, Levy has done nothing but sit and wait. Yeah, some myth that he is a good negotiator.
Considering what’s on offer for him at City compared to Spurs, he absolutely should be.Although Harry Kane wants to move, I don't think he's "desperate" to leave Spurs.
He wasn't forced to sign a long contract, he was happy to do so. Spurs want him to stay for the full term and I see no reason to think that he wouldn’t stay if a move to City falls through.
Kane isn't stupid. Levy isn't stupid. City aren't stupid. Common sense suggests that Spurs will stick by their guns and only sell if the asking price is met.
Whatever anyone else thinks is a "fair sum" for Harry Kane, the simple fact is that the only people who can decide what figure equates to a "fair sum" are all sitting in the Spurs Boardroom.
Kane will only sign for City when City pay the full asking price. We're not in the driving seat in this deal.
I've said on here before... We are fortunate to have owners who don't have to rely on debt.You could be describing the red mardarses there.
That's irrelevant as his value is obviously greater than that now. If they get an extra season out of him and get back into the CL places and he leaves then the CL income might well cover anything they lose on a potential transfer anyway.I
Yes but they've also got to take into account an offer of £100 million plus just won't happen again. He may have 3 years left on his contract but his value will reduce significantly over time. This is their one and only chance of some serious money for him and the player himself wants to move too. Only one outcome in my own personal opinion.
John mackem would score 30 goals with this midfield...This is on capital reloaded all the time.
Return of the Mack next ?
I know we're getting desperate for a striker but isn't John getting on a bit.This is on capital reloaded all the time.
Return of the Mack next ?