Harry Kane

CityMental said:
Looks like most of them don't begrudge the move, or wouldn't have, but for his behaviour with the Neville interview, not showing up and then his statement last week. If he'd had shut up and just done what he's always done they probably wouldn't be so irritated.
Click to expand...

They maybe wouldn't have let him go either though. He needed to burn the bridges to show them he was serious.
 
blueparrot said:
I suppose it’s time to confess I grew loving pie chips and gravy, 17 years in London with no gravy in chippys and when I moved up to Scotland I tried chips and gravy again and must now say I don’t like gravy on chips anymore.
Click to expand...
My entire world-view has been shattered!I've had to take to my fainting-couch with convulsions in both legs.
 
oldhamblue said:
To be fair this Kane thread has been derailed by @blueparrot no longer liking gravy on his chips bombshell. Every goal Kane scores for us will remind me of this thread, and a plate of dry gravyless chips
Click to expand...
Presumably he must put curry sauce on them, as opposed to eating them dry, ffs?
 
Romeo_451 said:
the spurs ITK said today/tomrrow then "not this weekend". the man literally contradicted himself?
Click to expand...
And just another thing to add.
I wouldn't hang your hopes up on ITK from Spurs community forums. There are very few sources on there who are respected. The person in question Trix is not particularly reliable and don't be fooled by the positive ratings from that website. If you say one thing negative about the ITK or question it the admin bans you hence all the positive ratings.

A few itk but actually from other Spurs forums or on twitter and I'd trust the media over any ITK from Spurs community.
 
CityMental said:
Looks like most of them don't begrudge the move, or wouldn't have, but for his behaviour with the Neville interview, not showing up and then his statement last week. If he'd had shut up and just done what he's always done they probably wouldn't be so irritated.
Click to expand...
Couldnt give a fuck what the gobby cockney wankers think to be honest mate,horrible fuckers.
 
As one sensible poster on Spurs Community said, he's gutted to be losing Kane, but if they get £150m for him plus another £50m from other sales & buy 3 x £70m starters with the money, Spurs will be stronger & better for it.

Yes one Kane will make us stronger, but 3 quality additions for Spurs will make them infinitely stronger going forward, & probably allow them to seriously challenge for a top 4 spot within the next two seasons.

If Kane stayed, & Spurs make minimum additions to their squad, I can't see them sustaining a challenge long enough to displace Us, ManUre, Chavs or the Dippers. With 3 quality additions for Spurs, that top four spot isn't assured for anyone imo.
 
Dobsy said:
They maybe wouldn't have let him go either though. He needed to burn the bridges to show them he was serious.
Click to expand...
I've been reading that thread for about 2 weeks. So many of them were willing to accept him going but his behaviour in the last few weeks is why it's filled with vitriol. So I can understand it to a certain degree. They were resigned to him going practically at the end of the season and willing to wish him well. But he's burned all of that in a few weeks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top