Harry Kane

[djkroot123]

Harry Kane was the leading goal scorer & assist maker last season.

He is English which obviously makes him worth a premium.

The fact that some of you don't think he's worth £150m+ is utter madness. If City were happy to shell out for Grealish who was £100m, a guy who has 15 goals and 16 assists IN HIS WHOLE PREMIER LEAGUE CAREER - Kane has bettered that in 1 season playing for an awful side.

Pay Levy the money and it will get done. It is as simple as that.

 

[waspish]

I still think paying 100m for a player in a position we don't currently have a huge problem in (striker, left back, defensive mid) FIRST this summer was a huge mistake and we should have first and foremost focused on solving the glaring issues rather than strengthening an already strong position. we keep doing this ever summer, that's why the LB problem stays unsolved.

We thinking ahead look at the ages of Kdb gundogan Mahrez when someone of his quality is getable you get him!

 

[citymad]

I would imagine all the media and all our rivals are fully behind Levy, hoping to leave us high and dry at the last minute.

 

[blue oli]

Are you stupid. I did that very thing for people like yourself

This isn’t going to end well…….

 

[SkyBlueCanuck]

I marvel that some posters eat up every spoonful of transfer gossip and create in their own minds a fiction of a daily, hourly even, back and forth struggle between our negotiators and Levy. As if this is how our club does its business.

I may be sorely mistaken, but I have to believe that this deal has been done for ages, months even, and the delay was always going to happen to allow match week 1 to pass by and Levy's deals for new players, deals which themselves may each have been weeks or months in the making, fall into place.

Believing any other interpretation of this story is to believe that City are some levels of stupid and incompetent. And we simply know that this isn't so.

 

[Mr-Mertle]

Tensions are high.

 

[I'm Blue]

Tensions are high.

Not as high as the price.

 

[blueparrot]

And if we came out and said we had walked away from this after working on it for months. After letting Sergio leave and without an alternative I honestly think the fans would go fucking mental. The club don't want mutiny from the fans.

We've offered £130m and left that deal on the table, spurs seem not interested so until they are we are pretty fucked unless we have alternatives ready and waiting. We cannot wait till deadline day and have our pants pulled down live on SSN when we end up with nobody

Easy solved, don't watch SSN.

 

[bobmcfc]

I marvel that some posters eat up every spoonful of transfer gossip and create in their own minds a fiction of a daily, hourly even, back and forth struggle between our negotiators and Levy. As if this is how our club does its business.

I may be sorely mistaken, but I have to believe that this deal has been done for ages, months even, and the delay was always going to happen to allow match week 1 to pass by and Levy's deals for new players, deals which themselves may each have been weeks or months in the making, fall into place.

Believing any other interpretation of this story is to believe that City are some levels of stupid and incompetent. And we simply know that this isn't so.

Or the reality that Levy wants £160m for Kane and we don't want to pay more than £100m plus add-ons and we're at an impasse

 

[mosssideblue]

if there were rumblings of city pulling out i wouldnt have posted above,its quite clear Levy is holding out for top money 150/160, now if your going to entertain that then your a bigger fool than your post suggests unless of course you have the attitute 'well its not my money' anything over 130 is just plain madness for a striker we will see four sesons from and thats without risk of knocks laying him out,'thats why we should walk'

If he is hanging in for top money, why haven't we walked?

 

[bobmcfc]

Easy solved, don't watch SSN.

I only watch on deadline day. From experience it's been good to us

 

[Tugay One Cup]

Not as high as the price.

Not as high as some commenting in here.

 

[Paulmcfc2703]

Vlahovic, Martinez, Gerard Moreno are a few.

You do realise he meant for us right?

Moreno has scored 20 league goals once in his career and is a year older than Kane.

 

[blueparrot]

if there were rumblings of city pulling out i wouldnt have posted above,its quite clear Levy is holding out for top money 150/160, now if your going to entertain that then your a bigger fool than your post suggests unless of course you have the attitute 'well its not my money' anything over 130 is just plain madness for a striker we will see four sesons from and thats without risk of knocks laying him out,'thats why we should walk'

The club will pay what the club can afford a sees as value. What difference does it make to you or me whether it's £130 mill or £150 mill.

 

[hgblue]

So you reckon the fans wouldn't be pissed off ? I'm not saying pitchforks at the Etihad and can't believe your take me so Literally haha.

You know for a fact everyone would be annoyed if it all went belly up with no alternative.

I'd be really, really annoyed. So annoyed that I would type a very strongly worded post on Bluemoon ;)

 

[blueparrot]

I only watch on deadline day. From experience it's been good to us

Have we done a deadline day deal recently ? can't really recall one.

 

[peter.evans]

Harry Kane was the leading goal scorer & assist maker last season.

He is English which obviously makes him worth a premium.

The fact that some of you don't think he's worth £150m+ is utter madness. If City were happy to shell out for Grealish who was £100m, a guy who has 15 goals and 16 assists IN HIS WHOLE PREMIER LEAGUE CAREER - Kane has bettered that in 1 season playing for an awful side.

Pay Levy the money and it will get done. It is as simple as that.

Kane is a striker, Grealish a midfielder. Was Aguero a better player than David Silva because he scored more goals !? Grealish is also much younger.Deary me.

 

[Mr-Mertle]

Have we done a deadline day deal recently ? can't really recall one.

Stones I think was the last. Happy to be proven wrong though.

 

[Gabriel]

I marvel that some posters eat up every spoonful of transfer gossip and create in their own minds a fiction of a daily, hourly even, back and forth struggle between our negotiators and Levy. As if this is how our club does its business.

I may be sorely mistaken, but I have to believe that this deal has been done for ages, months even, and the delay was always going to happen to allow match week 1 to pass by and Levy's deals for new players, deals which themselves may each have been weeks or months in the making, fall into place.

Believing any other interpretation of this story is to believe that City are some levels of stupid and incompetent. And we simply know that this isn't so.

I can agree with the bit about allowing the first match to pass, but unlike the Grealish transfer, where Villa were getting their eggs in a row beforehand, there has been nothing to suggest Spurs have all of their recruits in place, so I’m less inclined to believe that a deal is done, i.e. finalised.

 

[mattyb]

So you reckon the fans wouldn't be pissed off ? I'm not saying pitchforks at the Etihad and can't believe your take me so Literally haha.

You know for a fact everyone would be annoyed if it all went belly up with no alternative.

It’s just so dramatic mate, just use the words you mean