Chi-town blues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2012
- Messages
- 31,363
lubecrative job:)Just out of curiosity, what do you do?
lubecrative job:)Just out of curiosity, what do you do?
123...........Okay, I held off long enough. I'm going to go ahead and say it:
I don't want Harry Kane. There! I said it.
Something about this isn't right. And I think we'd suffer if this transfer goes through. Wearher the storm Txiki. Don't get got by that snake oil seller at Totunham.
Also while there is no basis for this other than an internal hunch, I'm sensing Kane is a lemon.
It will be like Sanchez going to United or Torres going to Chelsea. A player who is about done but know one can tell yet.
Just a bunch though... Either way, I'm all out.
1. Coz I want a chance at Haaland no matter how remote.
2. Co I want a younger player.
Both wants negate an overpriced Kane...
Please Pep, tell Txiki to w as lk away. We believe in you. You can do it without Kane.
Rant over. And I fe a lot better...

Oh noOkay, I held off long enough. I'm going to go ahead and say it:
I don't want Harry Kane. There! I said it.
Something about this isn't right. And I think we'd suffer if this transfer goes through. Wearher the storm Txiki. Don't get got by that snake oil seller at Totunham.
Also while there is no basis for this other than an internal hunch, I'm sensing Kane is a lemon.
It will be like Sanchez going to United or Torres going to Chelsea. A player who is about done but know one can tell yet.
Just a bunch though... Either way, I'm all out.
1. Coz I want a chance at Haaland no matter how remote.
2. Co I want a younger player.
Both wants negate an overpriced Kane...
Please Pep, tell Txiki to w as lk away. We believe in you. You can do it without Kane.
Rant over. And I fe a lot better...
I've made my peace with the move; if the club are adamant on going for Kane it's because Haaland isn't possible. The same reason Chelsea moved for Lukaku when they realised how difficult of a transfer Haaland is.
We all love the possiblity of the wonderkid who's the son of our former captain and, by all accounts, has a strong affinity to the club joining us. But alas it's not to be.
Kane is a huge risk and it'll never be value for money but it is what it is.
So sick of this pseudo ITK "I know something" bullshit. If tomorrow comes and goes... nothing happens, your account should be banned otherwise your empty predictions are nothing more than Blue Moon click bait.
I agree if the predictions don't come to pass you shouldn't take it personally.Or just hopeful optimism shared with other blues for a feel-good of communal positivity.
Haha posting at 3 am is going to do nothing for your lucrative career. Get some sleepMy hobby is football. Sadly some here see their life as making others think they know F all about anything. I get sick of the blowhards "I know what's going on" wankers who clearly have no other life. I have a lucrative career, wife, son... I'm sick of those here taking the piss who clearly know nothing. Quit feeding them.
I agree if the predictions don't come to pass you shouldn't take it personally.
Each game day we ask people to predict the line up and the result and it often doesn't come to pass.
I thought we would scrap a point against Spurs but banning me and others for our false optimism would be a bit rich.
Sanchez was past his best. That was evident and easy to identify because he was a player who was very reliant on his physicality. Kane is 28. He is at his peak but probably for a limited time so the valuation is extreme.Okay, I held off long enough. I'm going to go ahead and say it:
I don't want Harry Kane. There! I said it.
Something about this isn't right. And I think we'd suffer if this transfer goes through. Wearher the storm Txiki. Don't get got by that snake oil seller at Totunham.
Also while there is no basis for this other than an internal hunch, I'm sensing Kane is a lemon.
It will be like Sanchez going to United or Torres going to Chelsea. A player who is about done but know one can tell yet.
Just a bunch though... Either way, I'm all out.
1. Coz I want a chance at Haaland no matter how remote.
2. Co I want a younger player.
Both wants negate an overpriced Kane...
Please Pep, tell Txiki to w as lk away. We believe in you. You can do it without Kane.
Rant over. And I fe a lot better...
Dam it - I missed all the stupidity
I'm with you. My vote was no at the start, still is no and will remain no.Okay, I held off long enough. I'm going to go ahead and say it:
I don't want Harry Kane. There! I said it.
Something about this isn't right. And I think we'd suffer if this transfer goes through. Wearher the storm Txiki. Don't get got by that snake oil seller at Totunham.
Also while there is no basis for this other than an internal hunch, I'm sensing Kane is a lemon.
It will be like Sanchez going to United or Torres going to Chelsea. A player who is about done but know one can tell yet.
Just a bunch though... Either way, I'm all out.
1. Coz I want a chance at Haaland no matter how remote.
2. Co I want a younger player.
Both wants negate an overpriced Kane...
Please Pep, tell Txiki to w as lk away. We believe in you. You can do it without Kane.
Rant over. And I fe a lot better...
Your username and posts overnight are polar opposites.My hobby is football. Sadly some here see their life as making others think they know F all about anything. I get sick of the blowhards "I know what's going on" wankers who clearly have no other life. I have a lucrative career, wife, son... I'm sick of those here taking the piss who clearly know nothing. Quit feeding them.
Where is the risk in signing Kane? I don't see that. Expensive? Absolutely. I think you might be underestimating the revenue Manchester City earn from winning the Champions League and the Premier League. The Champions League is fraught with chance but with Kane we would have a good chance of winning it and becoming the dominant English club would allow us to control English football. We would be the go to club for the future. We do not want to be surpassed by Man Utd who would be able once again to cherry-pick players.I've made my peace with the move; if the club are adamant on going for Kane it's because Haaland isn't possible. The same reason Chelsea moved for Lukaku when they realised how difficult of a transfer Haaland is.
We all love the possiblity of the wonderkid who's the son of our former captain and, by all accounts, has a strong affinity to the club joining us. But alas it's not to be.
Kane is a huge risk and it'll never be value for money but it is what it is.
That was the same with me when i just joined. Its the same reaction sometimes if i write something that doesn't fit the universal consensus.Well not to sound harsh but Romeo does have a point. I have seen countless older members bullying or harassing members with low post counts either because they think they are the shit or they immediately feel the newcomers are WUMS. We should try to be inclusive and let others freely express their opinions without be taunted or shot down.
I don't think City could have an expectation that Bernardo would go to Spurs.So to summarise how we got on yesterday in trying to get this deal resolved.
From my understanding and if reports are correct. Jorge Mendes was supposed to come to City with a suitable deal to propose for Bernardos transfer. It hasn’t happened so City set up a meeting with Mendes (Mendes was alleged to have been meeting City and Bernardo his client yesterday). City said we have come up with a solution for your transfer…Spurs will take you as part of our offer for Kane. Bernardo presumably said I’m not signing for that shower of shite or words to that affect. City now have to come up with a different plan for this deal.
Whichever way this saga goes, Bernardo is a key part of our transfer activity.