Not the that but Dean couldn't have been any closer and ignored it
Media Thread - 2021/22
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
Not the that but Dean couldn't have been any closer and ignored it
I thought it was a dive when he went down because it was delayed. He was only caught a glancing blow but if he had not moved he would have been wiped out hence Utd had possession because of a moment of foul play. I don't think Pogba meant to hurt his opponent but the challenge was reckless. I can get Dean missing it but I don't see how VAR could possibly have missed it especially when Wolves protested.
jaiguruKun
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 5,420
Why Man City's £829m squad spend is justified
Manchester City have the most expensive squad in the Premier League at a cost of £829m.
www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk
Even the articles intended for City fans within the MUEN contain snide digs. Referring to the amount of money our squad cost in the headline and the article itself states that it's a fair accusation to say we've bought our way to success. It's not an accusation at all you pricks.
It's called winning trophies, something their darling Rags haven't done for 5 years in spite of having spent roughly the same amount of money on fees in that time and far more in wages. As has been said many times, our real crime has been to unseat their darlings.
The only half-decent journalist on the payroll there is Stu Brennan and even he isn't a Blue!
Let's also not allow them to forget that their messiah is a self-confessed rapist. I've seen the "smoking gun" documents that prove it.
Last edited:
Plus the blatant penalty Wolves did not get when James slid in and took out the Wolves player. Not even checked by Var
Pogba only flicked Neves shin pad according to Sly's very own Dermot Gallagher.
Well what the fuck was the still picture of Mike Dean wincing about then as the challenge was made?
Oldham Exile
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2021
- Messages
- 844
- Team supported
- Man City
The Liverpool site - RAWK - has to be the worse place to find City obsessed haters
I love how their 'fans' posts hundreds of posts competing with each other to explain just how much they don't care about City - when the fact that they just neeeed to do do that confirms that they are obsessed - we really live rent free......
Tommy_Catons_Perm
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Dec 2011
- Messages
- 2,474
If I'm reading that correctly, the rags have spent nearly a quarter of a BILLION pounds in wages on the current squad? And won nothing?
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
I used a variant of rent free in your head to my Chelsea armchair mate who likes to try and wind me up constantly....last night it was about a full ground...touched a nerve resulting in him ranting and me just replying SEE.
Always gets a reaction from anyone, it's like Welcome to Manchester and attempts to get the higher ground. They don't like it up 'em Mr Mannwaring.
I think that’s a year… as in the last year/coming year.
imagine 5 years of that.. Which will also include Sanchez (who he?).
as already mentioned, the weekly wage of just their highest fee earners, Ronald, Sancho, donut and varane, is more than the bottom (wage) 13 PL clubs entire squads combined.
and city are the only ones:
ruining football
causing wage inflation
have commentators calling them ‘Xmillion surname’, rather than ‘firstname surname’.
My road is a nice road, we have a WhatsApp group since covid, I knew there were some united supporters down it, but the amount that have come out of the woodwork since the return of Ronaldo ‘On a free’,’turned down City’… jeez…alternate realities.
- Status