Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bingo banging on again about the injustice of everything whilst being blind to the untold shit the disgusting club he manages has caused for the best part of 40 years is laughable..

The good news for every football fan in the country apart from their blameless, out of control, bus wrecking, firework throwing, spitting fans is that the dipper cycle is nearing its end..

The Egyptian diver, Mane, Matip, the water carrier, Judas, Firmino and dick van dyke are all into their 4th decade.

Bingo will be off season after next, if not sooner, along with most of the above.

Then FSG will no doubt not want to be investing a £billion plus into the dippers to keep them relevant

Us, Newcastle and Chelsea are the future of the PL which is why the likes of the dippers, rags, tarquins and spuds are constantly in the media whinging like fcuk..

They can see what's coming.

I'd hazard a guess that the day the dippers crawl back under their stone cannot come quick enough for the genuine football fan..!

You should know by now that hypocrisy runs deep with the dippers and rags , especially when the fear of missing out appears .
 
"Third club now owned by a country"....


I've only just seen this. Aside from the fact that he's moaning again and getting involved in another club's business (which has nothing to do with him), he makes just about the most illogical, unintelligent, incoherent response you could imagine about a club that has now come into money. Having money is not the issue or a guarantee of success, there are still limits on how you can spend it.....just as with any other club in the PL. It's what your owners do with that money and how they put their plans in place. We have been blessed with genuinely insightful owners who have planned our route very carefully. Klopp's owners appears to have little or no plan with regard to evolving the club. It remains to be seen whether Newcastle's new owners have a coherent plan, but Klopp seems to be genuinely bricking it about this new upstart .....and probably with good reason given how his club is run.
 
Don’t we play on Tuesday? I am sure the bt commentator just mentioned the European games on Tuesday but no mention of ours?
 
Did I hear Bingo say that Newcastle are now the third club owned by a country? And there was me thinking he was one of the more intelligent managers. He's clearly rattled by this news.
 
I’m struggling to see to where at the moment. Of those destinations that aren’t an active step down, the Spanish clubs are potless, the dippers would be an impossibility for obvious reasons, the rags already have Sancho, Rashford and the lady boy filling his preferred role and have other priorities anyway, which leaves who? Chelsea? Bayern?
If we‘ve learned one thing about Raheem over the last 3 or 4 years, it’s that he has very specific attributes and very specific weaknesses, and whilst Rio Ferdinand and some on this forum, don’t seem to want to acknowledge the existence of the latter, I’m not convinced any perspective clubs’ recruitment teams will…..unless they’re getting an absolute steal in respect of the asking price.
What would constitute an acceptable offer in the summer for a seasoned England international, who’s still only going to be 27? £50m, £60m, £70m, £80m? I’m not sure in the current Covid affected financial climate that we’d get such an offer from a club Raz would want to move to (ie offering Champions League football and guaranteed playing time). We barely scraped £40m for Leroy.
Personally, and despite what I view (rightly or wrongly) as relative shortcomings in his game, I’d still be sorry to see him go. He’s peak age, he’s English, he’s quick, he times his runs superbly, he has the ability to make things happen, he occupies opponents, and he very much affords us variety. On a good day (Liverpool away last season) he’s capable of shredding decent full backs, but on a bad day (United at home last season) he looks like a park player. If he was playing for any other team he’d probably be more universally appreciated, but in this current City team surrounded by players whose touch is exquisite (Bernie, Foden, Mahrez in particular), that lack of consistency is perhaps marking him out and making him the subject of unrealistic levels of criticism.
Whatever, I think he may be here for the remainder of his existing contract yet, for the reasons stated, and I think he may need to consider a step down if he wants guaranteed playing time, cos given his form for the last 18 months in comparison to what he was bringing to the party prior to that, a suitable offer for both player and club might not be forthcoming
PSG

Mbappe off to Real Madrid, means an opportunity in Paris
 
There must be dozens of decent journos out there who are pushed into writing bollocks for the clicks of the ignorati.
It would heaven for them (and proper fans) to be told 'get the gloves off' and tear into those redshirted bastards.
There is a huge amount of material on and off field to use, they could make a series.
 
Last edited:
Don’t we play on Tuesday? I am sure the bt commentator just mentioned the European games on Tuesday but no mention of ours?
At the end of the news last night the newscaster gave out the usual MOTD warning about the scores but said 'if you don't want to hear the Liverpool and Manchester United scores...blah, blah, whatever.....' but he then gave out all the results.
But it was weird that he omitted the first and third in the league in his warning whilst mentioning the second and a team not in the top four as if only those two teams matter.
Unless they know the plastic fans of those clubs wait until after 10pm without checking the scores.
The simple thing is not to mention any names but perhaps they get off using dirty words before bedtime.
 
Matterface, I think, was saying 'you can really see Liverpool's desire to win their title back'...
Now, if he'd said 'the title', then that would not court controversy, but 'their title'...eh?? They've only won it once, and that was their only top flight win in 31 years, and, last time I looked, is it not currently our title?
 
Matterface, I think, was saying 'you can really see Liverpool's desire to win their title back'...
Now, if he'd said 'the title', then that would not court controversy, but 'their title'...eh?? They've only won it once, and that was their only top flight win in 31 years, and, last time I looked, is it not currently our title?
It is the small stuff like that, that pisses you off tbh.
So innocuous that is seeps into the general publics thoughts and sticks there like a true fact.

The knives will be out for junior Gollum soon as they can't have their true love languishing again.

One article on the bbc to that affect already.
 
Last edited:
There must be dozens of decent journos out there who are pushed into writing bollocks for the clicks of the ignorati.
It would heaven for them (and proper fans) to be told 'get the gloves off' and tear into those redshirted bastards.
There is a huge amount of material on and off field to use, they could make a series.
You give them way, way too much credit. A scummy bunch of twats who would write anything as long as they got paid for it. The only thing lower than their professional integrity is their talent.
 
BBC this morning on breakfast show the unknown female anchor might as well have rubbed the nub as she went on about how fantastic Peter Sutcliffe goal against Watford was. She was literally squealing and moanin as they showed the goal, so much so even the co presenters commented on it !!!
 
You give them way, way too much credit. A scummy bunch of twats who would write anything as long as they got paid for it. The only thing lower than their professional integrity is their talent.
I'll go in undercover as a rag or dipper and infiltrate them watching them and writing adoring articles
Then l will tell the truth, come out as a blue and tell even more truth about the redshirts.
On second thoughts l could never do the first part.
Seriously the idea that all journos are rags or dippers is as daft as saying most people support those two. They just don't have balls to write what we all know.
 
BBC this morning on breakfast show the unknown female anchor might as well have rubbed the nub as she went on about how fantastic Peter Sutcliffe goal against Watford was. She was literally squealing and moanin as they showed the goal, so much so even the co presenters commented on it !!!
Yes she was an horrific attention seeker in all subjects.

If l may say so without being falsely accused of misogyny.
 
Last edited:
At the end of the news last night the newscaster gave out the usual MOTD warning about the scores but said 'if you don't want to hear the Liverpool and Manchester United scores...blah, blah, whatever.....' but he then gave out all the results.
But it was weird that he omitted the first and third in the league in his warning whilst mentioning the second and a team not in the top four as if only those two teams matter.
Unless they know the plastic fans of those clubs wait until after 10pm without checking the scores.
The simple thing is not to mention any names but perhaps they get off using dirty words before bedtime.
Yes ,I thought that was strange the BBC are red sycophants ...pathetic
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top