Religion

I’m FOC territory according to the lingo on ere.

Which I’m not happy about.
what you're not happy to be a FOC or not happy to have the label? I don't think I'm quite FOC yet but getting close to considering another day above ground to be a bonus, whatever other people say
 
what you're not happy to be a FOC or not happy to have the label? I don't think I'm quite FOC yet but getting close to considering another day above ground to be a bonus, whatever other people say
Both :-)

Youth is wasted on the young
 
Ha ha ha, you're crackers mate

But to indulge sure only refences to vegetarianism is verses 1 and 9, which contradict themselves as one says be veggie the other say eat what you like as long as its blood is drained.
Is this classed as veggie'?

Kings 2 18:27​

But Rabshakeh said unto them, Hath my master sent me to thy master, and to thee, to speak these words? [hath he] not [sent me] to the men which sit on the wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss with you?
 
Is this classed as veggie'?

Kings 2 18:27​

But Rabshakeh said unto them, Hath my master sent me to thy master, and to thee, to speak these words? [hath he] not [sent me] to the men which sit on the wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss with you?

Don't think so, but it explains why all these evangelical ministers in the US get up to freaky shit behind the scenes
 
Last edited:
No, the Arabs at the time of Muhammad(saw) were not traveling to mainland Africa to trade slaves at the time. It's easy to say today slavery is evil, immoral etc. , yet when I asked you "Are you more moral than Jesus(as), Paul, Aristotle, Plato etc.. ", you evaded the question. Perhaps you already know answering this question from a historical perspective is different. Even if you answer 'Yes', I'm sure if you lived in their times, your views (or mine) on slavery wouldn't be the same as it is today.
So we are now ignoring historical facts? The Arab slave trade is a historical fact a event that happened. That means the arabs travelled to the mainland africa... I cant take you serious if you are going to choose to be ignorant.

As for your question relating to being more moral than jesus, paul etc. This is why i know this is a pointless discussion. It is islam and mohammed that claims to be the perfect moral example for mankind for all times. Islam is the one that makes those claims. Not paul, not aristotle, paul or plato. So why should i have to defend them? You are making the claim, not me. I am simply saying that based on evidence, you have no grounds to make that claim. Mohammed is nowhere close to being a morally / perfect example for mankind. But you still pray to him and see him as an example for mankind.

I dont believe in Christianity or jesus, but i could look at evidence and say he did not enslave people, he did not rape the people he enslaved, he did not wage war or killed people. So Jesus, if he was real, would have indeed lived a more morally righteous life than Mohammed yes.
 
“The collection of atoms in orbit around it have named it; The Sun. Our Sun. We’ve worshipped it, deified it, since the dawn of history. In fact, it’s been argued that the Sun lies at the foundation of all religion. And there may be some truth in that. In fact, I think there is a deep truth in that because we all owe our existence to this brief time we have in the Universe to that star. In fact, in a deeper sense to all the stars.

We don’t need to invent imaginary gods to explain the Universe; we can replace them with the real thing.”

Prof. Brian Cox, 2021
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What you talking about, the Quran says winged horses exist so it must be true. Stop being so rational jeez
When I finally go, i don't want burial, nor cremation, viking funeral or open pyre.

Winged. Horse, brah.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top