What are your unpopular opinions on City that you believe 100%?

Shaelumstash said:
Liverpool are more exciting to watch than City
Click to expand...

You believe that 100 %?

Liverpool have never scored 90 + league goals under Klopp, City have scored 95 + league goals 3 times under Pep, and 100 + league goals twice.

Liverpool's games may be more exciting to watch in the sense in which it is more interesting to watch less predictable than more predictable games. Liverpool's games are more open than ours, they concede more chances than us and thus are less in control of games than us. That is, they take more risks than us, without scoring more goals, though. City may be less exciting to watch in the sense that City dominate games more than Liverpool. That is, because City are better than Liverpool :)
 
City’s kits are nearly always absolutely shit. We have only ever had about half a dozen nice kits in my lifetime (I’m 40 this year). New York City’s kit from last season is better than any home shirt we’ve ever had.
 
Teams don't sit deep with 10 men behind the ball not looking to get out of their box. We as the superior team impose our game on them which results in them being stuck in that position.

Opposition do not try harder against us than against other teams. If its seemingly more difficult for us it's our style or the other team that's won easily has performed very well.

The media don't have an overwhelming hatred of city. they make stories that sell, most stories have negative slants because that's more appealing to more people, all teams get a shit ride.

Every single official and anybody with an ounce of power in the game are not out to screw us at every available opportunity

We would probably be a better counter attacking side if Pep were to set us up that way (not that I'd want us to play like that)
 
alexmcity said:
You believe that 100 %?

Liverpool have never scored 90 + league goals under Klopp, City have scored 95 + league goals 3 times under Pep, and 100 + league goals twice.

Liverpool's games may be more exciting to watch in the sense in which it is more interesting to watch less predictable than more predictable games. Liverpool's games are more open than ours, they concede more chances than us and thus are less in control of games than us. That is, they take more risks than us, without scoring more goals, though. City may be less exciting to watch in the sense that City dominate games more than Liverpool. That is, because City are better than Liverpool :)
Click to expand...
Exactly, if you want ‘jeopardy’ which seems to be the new narrative then go watch Newcastle try to stay up. Or binge Squid Game on Netflix
 
Psychedelic Casual said:
City’s kits are nearly always absolutely shit. We have only ever had about half a dozen nice kits in my lifetime (I’m 40 this year). New York City’s kit from last season is better than any home shirt we’ve ever had.
Click to expand...
Not sure that would qualify as an "unpopular" opinion, to be honest.
 
kun said:
All-seater stadiums.
Stewards telling fans not to stand.
You always have the option of watching the game on TV on your sofa.

How on earth are your needs ignored???
Click to expand...
All seater stadiums in which many people prefer to stand. Especially away and at Wembley. Try asking them to sit and see what happens. They don't give a shit.
Stewards are about as effective as chocolate fireguards.
Don't worry - I much prefer TV football these days. Less hassle all round.
Finally, this is a thread for unpopular but sincerely-held opinions!
 
MarsLlama said:
Why is it the responsibility of the mods to filter out anyone that you perceive to not be the kind of fan City should have?
Click to expand...

You’re missing the whole point. It’s not the ‘ask your questions’ thread, it’s the ‘give your unpopular opinions thread’.

Having said that, it would be very easy for you to rejig the gist of your words by posting ‘I hope that this thread ends up like RAWK where the mods remove any posts that aren’t deludedly entitled‘. ;-)
 
BrazilianBlue (Gus) said:
The only odd thing is you singling out “foreign players”
Click to expand...
Nothing untoward in my comment Gus. It's not uncommon for even the most intelligent people to come across a bit 'awkwardly' in conversation in a second/third language, particularly with people they don't really know.
Don't look for things that aren't there mate, you'll only end up barking up the wrong tree.
 
BillyShears said:
I think you've nailed it there. There's a bit of a hangover from hating Txiki/Ferran too because they're seen as the guys who got rid of Mancini to bring their own guy in. Pellegrini was dubbed a yes man and a stopgap and now they don't really like Pep for the same reasons.
Click to expand...

Bizarre, isn’t it.

The most successful Manager in our history, hands down - playing the best football any City fan has ever been lucky enough to witness - and they can’t get behind it and fully enjoy it after all their years of hard slog because they hold a grudge over how Mancini was sacked.

He’s moved on - we should to!
 
Sigh.......we might as well be celtic.
Peps tikki takka is struggling in the prem.
We only got off on a technicality.
We cant be classed as a great team yet.
As fans we are complicit with human rights abuses.
We are ruining football.
Only winning the cl matters for us now.
We stink of money.
We are a frankenstein club.
There is no media agenda against us.

If you dont agree, find me a media outlet that refutes even half the above.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top