Just an assumption......I'm presuming Haaland's decision has something also to do with Pep staying a bit longer?He's getting six.
The only 'right' price for Rashford right now is a free transfer. His effort levels are among the worst I've ever seen from a top-flight player. Doesn't give a shit.I wouldn't say no if the price was right. The boy wouldn't even need to move house. Everybody wins! :-)
He’d score his FareShare of goals, I reckon.I wouldn't say no if the price was right. The boy wouldn't even need to move house. Everybody wins! :-)
I know Ings is the butt of many City-Striker-related jokes, but nobody can tell me he wouldn’t have scored 25 for us this season.Ahh so sad maybe madrid should get ings for 10 years .
Depends on Pep.So on a Messi > Maguire sliding scale how dissapointed are you going to be if this falls through?
I'd be at about Hazard levels I think.
It’s the same guy pushing the 3 years line and this “Perez informed Watzke” bullshit lol. Another one with a “great” history…So 3 years at Madrid as well then..
Would it be six with a release clause going active after the 4th year? I think that makes sense for both sides. Long term security for him in case he doesn't move after the 4th year.He's getting six.
His links with Haaland is greatly exaggerated. He actually has some decent contacts in german football, but never seems to be fed anything spectacular. He is usually way to occupied by his own opinions to even register the info he is fed anyway. He is also an absolute cockIf Haaland signs Fartoft is going to be so annoying when it comes to city news
Is there a release clause that kicks in after a certain number of years?He's getting six.