Fuck sake
Yeah he's on, fucking cunts.
Fuck sake
This is it for meWe’ve just got to win the trophies.
If we win the treble this season then the trophy cabinets will reveal it to be a Ferguson/Wenger type rivalry where one wins all the trophies and the other talks a lot.
If Liverpool win the quadruple their trophy haul since Pep arrived is simply better.
The more I look at that frame, and the more I think about the corrupt refereeing, the more angry I get. But, at the same time, the more proud I am of the team, wasted chances and all, for very nearly overcoming such insurmountable odds.Christ...that should be an easy pass to Foden for a virtual tap in. Never realised from my seat that he chose to try an execute such a difficult finish with Phil onside and facing goal.
Same here I'm still well pissed off.Woke up this morning and I’m pissed off with that result. We should have won, and I’m very disappointed that we didn’t.
Fuck sake
Fucking hell, cheating cunts. We'll just have to do it the hard way again.
And the mahrez debacle at the end. Oh well, bit more excitement for the run in, if my heart can take it.the sterling miss in the first half is what really hurts for me ? the offside and sterling putting away the chance can be judged right or wrong. but the miss only lies at sterlings feet
That was the problem. Whistle was blown before the ball was put in the net, so a goal was never scored. Therefore VAR can’t get involved. In my opinion this was another mistake from good old Mr Taylor.It's longer than you remember. I'm pretty sure Foden heard the whistle before he shot, you could see people stop playing.
When I looked back at it, the single camera angle they showed didn’t really show what had happened. I often think the fact that they didn’t show a reply kinda confirms that there’s something to see. All part of the fix imo. I watched that bad sports doc recently about Moggie at Juve. Really good insight into how football gets fixed. It’s about percentages. Probably impossible to accurately predict the score and outcome of every game but not impossible to work the percentages by having a few friendly refs etc. I’ve absolutely no doubt that there’s an element of coercion in all professional sports. The line of acceptable practice is constantly being stretched.But did Dick Van Dyk give him a nudge in the back strange for it not too be shown on a replay either wsy
And the mahrez debacle at the end. Oh well, bit more excitement for the run in, if my heart can take it.
I'm starting to get pissed off how Liverpool's narrative is being attached to our own achievements and greatness over the five or six years.
The difference between the teams yesterday was there for all to see, as is the fact, Pep has had Klopp's number in all the games since the Champions League exit to them.
Tactically, style, results, trophies,goals, clean sheets, we are ahead in every metric.
It's even got to the point now where the media are manipulating the stats to not factor in in our 2018 title win, as that would obviously evidence the points/trophies by both teams since then has a big differential.
I read yesterday that Pep is three games short of quickest to 200 Prem League wins - despite playing thirty-odd games less than Klopp and arriving a year later.
Liverpool are ruthless up top, but I believe Klopp is struggling to keep the rest of the team up with them and will have to evolve against City with that defence and midfield.
That was the problem. Whistle was blown before the ball was put in the net, so a goal was never scored. Therefore VAR can’t get involved. In my opinion this was another mistake from good old Mr Taylor.
Liverpool = hoofball
If you ever wanted a revelation of bias, read the times post match report… paraphrasing but it goes along the lines of ‘VAR played its part, most notably the rocket from salah, which clipped the hand of Laporte and no corner given’, nothing on the interpretation or sterling’s effort mind or the cynical challenges we endured the last 20 minutes!
It's deliberately or incompetent. But given the PGMOL are a secretive closed shop that is not open to any scrutiny or any accountability it does make you wonder.There is, IIRC, actually a ruling that says that offside should be judged at the moment when the player making the pass actually makes contact with the ball for his pass, not when the ball is released.
So why is it that on the NBC freeze frame, like the one sky used after Raheem scored, at the point he plays the ball Kevin's right leg is more or less upright, but on the freeze frame used by VAR his leg is extended and the ball is, as many have said, elongated due to the freeze frame. In other words, it's not when his foot makes contact with the ball, it's as it leaves it.
So why did VAR use the wrong frame? To my mind that can only be deliberate.