HelloCity
Well-Known Member
Horton agreed that we needed a centre back so he bought Kernaghan…
Horton agreed that we needed a centre back so he bought Kernaghan…
I liked the philosophy that Alan Ball insisted we play out from the back. The Keeper (think it was Tony Coton) regular rolled the ball out to the full backs.
Ok thanks for that, I forgot about him. I remember I did like that change of play though. I’d have been in my twenties back then and I wore a flat cap for most of the season until I threw it down a ginnel on kippax street after we got relegated.It was Immel and that was probably as far as he could kick it.
Clark spent an absolute fortune on duds.I feel a bit more like Clark had to deal with the damage Ball caused. He clearly want up to it, but Ball was the one who fucked things up.
Went to both those anfield games...I went to that one and Im pretty sure it was 4-0 but remember those comments. If memory serves me correct we went back in the league 4 days later and got beat 6-0
I was at Maine rd for an oasis gig the day after we,d beaten villa away,iircCorrect, and I missed it, going to an Oasis gig at Earls Court that night.
First thing Noel said when he came on stage: "fucking hell, we've won a game, I can't believe it!"
We did play some nice stuff under Horton,..who can forget the 5-2 win at Maine rd v spurs who had Sheringham,Klinnsman and Dumitrescu in an exciting forward line v our Walsh Quinn Rosler Beagrie Summerbee attack....but describing Hortons style as 'proto Pep' is stretching it a little,ImoBecause he was seen as Swales man? We played nice stuff under Brian, proto Pep.
Can't disagree with you there but would say that by getting time Clark came, off the top of my head Curle, Quincy, Flitcroft, Walsh, Beagrie(?), Lomas etc were all gone.
I'm assuming that's true mate and have no reason to doubt you but what that means is you changed our history. Because without doubt Joe got us out of the shit.
You are very lucky in the football sense (and hope so in the rest of your life) because as a fan you've actually directly influenced our history and not many of us can say that.
I'm just amazed, grateful and to some degree, envious!!!!
I remember my mates going down to watch the training at platt lane. We all played sunday league and were fairly competent players. They told me City were practising putting crosses into the box but either couldn't beat the first defender or sent it sailing out for a goal kick. When they packed up to go for a shower everyone watching booed them off. Makes nowadays seem like a dream.
Didnt he retire to have a hip replacement around the time ball left and the caretaker (Hartford) replaced him Dibble?It was Immel and that was probably as far as he could kick it.
Yep I think you're right about him being 4th choice (or way way down the list). Listening to Franny's interview on the City website, he eludes to the fact that City were messed about by another big "Manchester name" who took a month before making his mind up and eventually said no - obviously he was talking about Brian Kidd who'd have probably been a disaster too (based on his time at Blackburn). According to Franny in that same interview, they had no intention of sacking Horton, it was a misunderstanding as some gobshite board member went to the papers (he wouldn't name him) saying he should be sacked but it wasn't a board decision. Horton got pissed off and basically walked.I couldn't believe it when he was appointed. The previous season we just escaped relegation so Franny said "There'll be no more of that next season. We aim to be much further up the table". Think Alan (RIP) was 4th choice in the end. What a flamin disaster & worse was to come.
Colin Barlow had read out a statement 2 days after the season ended regarding the sacking being a board decision, after Lee has said we should be aiming for top 6 not avoiding relegation. After the Lee comments Horton went to seek assurances prompting his sacking, which was obviously coming, just they announced it sooner.Yep I think you're right about him being 4th choice (or way way down the list). Listening to Franny's interview on the City website, he eludes to the fact that City were messed about by another big "Manchester name" who took a month before making his mind up and eventually said no - obviously he was talking about Brian Kidd who'd have probably been a disaster too (based on his time at Blackburn). According to Franny in that same interview, they had no intention of sacking Horton, it was a misunderstanding as some gobshite board member went to the papers (he wouldn't name him) saying he should be sacked but it wasn't a board decision. Horton got pissed off and basically walked.
Lol.. well that's definitely NOT Lee's version of events, perhaps he's re-writing history though.Colin Barlow had read out a statement 2 days after the season ended regarding the sacking being a board decision, after Lee has said we should be aiming for top 6 not avoiding relegation. After the Lee comments Horton went to seek assurances prompting his sacking, which was obviously coming, just they announced it sooner.
Bruce Rioch was a target and fan favourite for the job.
This is a common myth IMO. Horton had us playing some great football in the first few months of the 1994-95 season for sure - who could forget the 5-2 win at home to Spurs in particular and convincing home wins against Everton and West Ham as well? - but it was only home games where we were performing. Away from home we were getting twatted left, right, and centre. 3-0 defeats at Arsenal, Chelsea, and West Ham, and that 5-0 debacle at Old Trafford. All those defeats came before Christmas and once our unbeaten home record went against Arsenal in December 1994, our home form fell off a cliff too. We went from 6th in the league in early December to the brink of the relegation zone in the space of 3 or 4 months and it was only those back-to-back wins at home to Liverpool on Good Friday and away to eventual champions Blackburn on Easter Monday that kept us up. Those 2 wins were huge and fully deserved but they actually came totally out of the blue and were outliers during a prolonged run of terrible results and performances which had seen us win only 2 of our previous 19 games.Brian Horton was doing a decent job, why Lee fucked him off for the flat capped squeaker I’ll never know
This is a common myth IMO. Horton had us playing some great football in the first few months of the 1994-95 season for sure - who could forget the 5-2 win at home to Spurs in particular and convincing home wins against Everton and West Ham as well? - but it was only home games where we were performing. Away from home we were getting twatted left, right, and centre. 3-0 defeats at Arsenal, Chelsea, and West Ham, and that 5-0 debacle at Old Trafford. All those defeats came before Christmas and once our unbeaten home record went against Arsenal in December 1994, our home form fell off a cliff too. We went from 6th in the league in early December to the brink of the relegation zone in the space of 3 or 4 months and it was only those back-to-back wins at home to Liverpool on Good Friday and away to eventual champions Blackburn on Easter Monday that kept us up. Those 2 wins were huge and fully deserved but they actually came totally out of the blue and were outliers during a prolonged run of terrible results and performances which had seen us win only 2 of our previous 19 games.
Sacking Horton was the right decision for me as I feel he may well have taken us down the following season. Appointing Alan Ball is a different discussion altogether and it doesn't in any way make Horton's sacking wrong. And let's not forget that Horton hardly set the world alight in any of his subsequent jobs apart - IIRC - from a very brief spell where he had Huddersfield performing well. But it all went pear-shaped in the end and he was sacked just over 2 years into the job with Huddersfield bottom of the table.