I agree with you. Sometimes to make changes you need to push from the inside. It can be done without being disrespectful and it can give the players (not just ours) a sense of City is looking out for our best interests.Taylor was in sky and asked about the players who left it was pity he didn’t mention the wage cap because if they want the woman’s game to improve that has to be binned off
I know this is petty and a non-issue to most. However, to me it highlights the disparity between the way the club treats it's men's and women's teams.
The club shop website if you wish to purchase a new, printed shirt you can search by player. Then you get the option to search by mcfc or mcwfc players. All of the new men's team summer signings, bar Sergio Gomez, are available. None of the women's new signings are up on the site.
I know. I could have anything, within reason, printed on a shirt. I can "personalise" it with a new mcwfc player. I suppose it is the principle .
Rant over, as you were.
If enough people cared then the business would provide.
True, but perhaps the recent success and interest in the women's game is a good reason for the club to be proactive ?
Not necessarily. Ordinarily, this may be correct but I am not certain in this case. For the women's team printed shirts you have the option of adding a WSL badge on the sleeve.If enough people cared then the business would provide.
This is almost entirely a matter of business strategy, though. Slow/safe businesses wait for proven market demand but that doesn't it's the only way or the right way. Leading demand or correctly predicting it is how you make money!If enough people cared then the business would provide.
Doesn't strike me as something difficult to incorporate though and nobody would lose out by us doing it. Seems poor not to.If enough people cared then the business would provide.
This is a thought that just came to me. How many Aké, Ortega or Scott Carson shirts do you reckon are sold? I'm sure some people purchase them but not nearly as many as the stars of the team. However, the opportunity is there for someone to purchase one.If enough people cared then the business would provide.
Taylor was in sky and asked about the players who left it was pity he didn’t mention the wage cap because if they want the woman’s game to improve that has to be binned off
Mate, we've had this discussion over and over in this thread (or maybe the last one?) people just don't want to hear it. Easier to blame a wage cap than accept City aren't doing all they could.The wage cap probably isn't the main factor in explaining the departures though. It's set at 40% of turnover but (if im understanding things correctly) turnover can include funding from the parent club. So we could put more in and pay higher wages if we really want to.
Mate, we've had this discussion over and over in this thread (or maybe the last one?) people just don't want to hear it. Easier to blame a wage cap than accept City aren't doing all they could.
100%. Not to mention the negative impact getting rid of the salary cap could have on the overall state of the league, there's still plenty of teams barely paying players living wages. Yeah, it might encourage people to spend more and raise the overall level, but it might also leave us with a few teams running away with it and the rest absolutely miles off and uncompetitive.Yeah, like tbh, if people want to argue the case that the women's team should be self sufficient then that's fine, (although it's not like our men's team didn't benefit from having a parent company pump loads of money in.) But it definitely seems off the mark to assume the loss of players is down to a salary cap when we could pay more in wages if we wanted to. Personally i'd like to see us putting more into it and help speed up the development of the women's game.
100%. Not to mention the negative impact getting rid of the salary cap could have on the overall state of the league, there's still plenty of teams barely paying players living wages. Yeah, it might encourage people to spend more and raise the overall level, but it might also leave us with a few teams running away with it and the rest absolutely miles off and uncompetitive.
Yeah, there's a balance has to be found at the end of the dayYeah, like i get that the idea of a cap is to make growth sustainable and stop teams running away with it. But I also think it's kind of unfair to make elite female players pay for the mistakes made in the men's game.
Yeah, there's a balance has to be found at the end of the day
Yeah, no argument. I think if they start examining the wage cap situation it needs to follow along with a minimum salary requirement as well, at least then while you are increasing what's possible at the top, you're making sure that there's some growth/balance at the other end too.For sure. But whatever the case, it must be frustrating seeing the men's game being allowed to drive itself further into the ground with leveraged buyouts etc and owners piling more debt onto clubs and yet be told, as a top female footballer, that it'd be irresponsible to pay them more.
They will see how that interest pans out this season and maybe next, the business will sell to customers that are there.
There has always been interest in womens football (Can we use that term now ) but that interest has been in matches like the world cup in this country or the Olympics etc.
|Have we got the numbers available? How many season tickets have been sold as yet? What is the rise compared to last season? Business will look at these numbers before jumping in with both feet.