the only people that defend these ludicrous salaries work/have ties to a similar situation within public sector - end of.How many earn that amount in the private sector?
What value do you put on a doctor? More or less than a banker?
the only people that defend these ludicrous salaries work/have ties to a similar situation within public sector - end of.How many earn that amount in the private sector?
What value do you put on a doctor? More or less than a banker?
Well that’s that then, you’ve said end of.the only people that defend these ludicrous salaries work/have ties to a similar situation within public sector - end of.
Current, recent and likely future strikes.So, the selfish strands of the 'public sector' who are striking or intend to to for more money, because let's face it - who else goes on strike or can afford to beside the public sector?
The public sector expects the general public to pay more tax to cover the inflation rises?
So, the so called educated among us - for example the ‘teachers’ etc...simply can't work out that the general public mathematically can’t pay a 300% energy price hike, ON TOP of soaring fuel food etc? and THEN pay their salary rises on top of that.
Yes they CAN WORK OUT the public can’t afford this, of course they can! - they just don’t give a flying fuck - teachers want a 3 day working week? for steady good salaries, ludicrous holidays and iron clad pensions - society doesn’t work. privatise everything. All in or none.
This winter and upcoming year/years is going to be carnage.
So, its ok for public sector strikes to go ahead - and for the government to cave in, and pay more money to public sector workers - answer this! - the public sector salaries come from the government - which in turn tax the population. Are you dumb?These costs have zero effect on the prices to come.
It‘s a similar argument to suggest Nottingham Forest are spending too much. Haven’t they seen that the price of fuel is going up dramatically?
Thats not relevant either.
Don’t forget the barristers.Current, recent and likely future strikes.
Railways? Private sector
Post Office? Private sector
BT? Private sector.
Openreach? Private sector.
Container Ports? Private sector.
Airport Staff? Private sector.
Airline Pilots? Private sector.
Journalists at Reach publications? Private sector.
Which public sector workers are on strike currently?So, its ok for public sector strikes to go ahead - and for the government to cave in, and pay more money to public sector workers - answer this! - the public sector salaries come from the government - which in turn tax the population. Are you dumb?
Pull our belts in..lolI realise that carbon zero and the Ukrainian war is the main reason for price hike - and WE ALL need to pull our belts in - the public sector included. they can not have pay rises, some people are blind to that.
Just out of interest, what happened to him? Did he take his bat home when his beloved Boris got ousted?Is Worsley back?
So because one of the bosses at my trust earned that (one that I've never heard, seen or spoken too btw) I can get to fuck on my salary... Or the domestics & porters can piss off on their just about national living wage...So this was in 2015 - is this acceptable to you?
![]()
Fifty thousand NHS staff earn 'at least £100,000'
There are more than 50,000 people in the NHS who earned more than £100,000 in 2013-14, an investigation by the Taxpayers' Alliance and Daily Mail shows.www.bbc.co.uk
Don't know and don't care.Just out of interest, what happened to him? Did he take his bat home when his beloved Boris got ousted?
Does that mean we have 50 thousand chiefs in highly paid positions and not enough Nurses and doctors porters and other staff to run the NHSSo this was in 2015 - is this acceptable to you?
![]()
Fifty thousand NHS staff earn 'at least £100,000'
There are more than 50,000 people in the NHS who earned more than £100,000 in 2013-14, an investigation by the Taxpayers' Alliance and Daily Mail shows.www.bbc.co.uk
Yes and that means poor people will die because they can’t afford to heat and eat, apparently.Does that mean we have 50 thousand chiefs in highly paid positions and not enough Nurses and doctors porters and other staff to run the NHS
In reality over 90% of the 50,000 are in senior clinical roles (consultants etc.) many of whom could earn a lot more in the private sector.Does that mean we have 50 thousand chiefs in highly paid positions and not enough Nurses and doctors porters and other staff to run the NHS
Funnily enough, the founder of the Taxpayers Alliance who did the report into high paid NHS workers is the same person who founded the Conservative Friends of Russia. Unsurprisingly he was also a leading Brexiteer.The problem is, when the economy is doing well and the private sector is getting huge wedges, no one thinks the public sector should share the bounty. They are told to be grateful for rises that match inflation. But when things are bad, and inflation is high, successive governments have used the public sector as an economic tool by holding their rises to an artificially low level. Over time, this builds up obvious pressures.
But as has been said, almost all current strikers are private sector workers! There's just a blockage in some people's brains that persuades them any striker must be public sector. It's almost as if the Daily Mail's lying propaganda works.(Also an amazing number of people think Russia is still Communist, despite the existence, until very recently, of the Conservative Friends of Russia.)
?Yes and that means poor people will die because they can’t afford to heat and eat, apparently.
If we have less people, we need less doctors.
Maybe SJT is onto something.
And I wonder how many of them were pushed over 100k by having to work overtime because of staffing shortages. Hell, they even included people's redundancy payments in the list. "Look at all the people (who've since been fired) who are earning over 100k." A study by a shady organisation that claims to have represent the British taxpayers, but no-one actually knows who they represent, because they refuse to disclose who funds them.In reality over 90% of the 50,000 are in senior clinical roles (consultants etc.) many of whom could earn a lot more in the private sector.
No, my point is there’s too many idiots overpaid there - too many bean-counters and admin. not the general staff etc...So because one of the bosses at my trust earned that (one that I've never heard, seen or spoken too btw) I can get to fuck on my salary... Or the domestics & porters can piss off on their just about national living wage...
I do however, disagree with an earlier post on here asking for a properly funded NHS... I would like to work for an NHS that doesn't piss money down the drain... But that's a different argument.