Harry Kane

If Haaland does leave in 2024 for Real, we can have Harry for free that year. Just a contingency plan. Will always prefer keeping Haaland for a very long time.
 
Matt the Giant said:
Kane in our squad would have been fantastic, and the amount of goals he would have scored, would not be that different from what Erling will score. Imho.

But Haaland was/is the better long-term choice.
Click to expand...
Kane in our squad would have at the very very least got us to another Champions League final.

Anyway I'm happy now we have Haaland.

Kane is still absolute quality tho it's not his fault his bellend manager plays 8 defenders.
 
balotellishaircut said:
Kane is running in treacle now, don’t know what he’d be like in 2 years but it wouldn’t be beneficial to us.
Click to expand...
Spot on, I admit I would have taken him when we (allegedly) tried....but looks like he's been wearing lead shin pads since!
My Spursy mate always said he would happily have driven him to us at the time for anything over £50m and believes he's their biggest problem now....hard to argue on this week's 2 games, he was everything he's been saying since then.
Side note, Bissouma and Cucurella look like massive dodging of bullets....so far.
 
Matt the Giant said:
Kane in our squad would have been fantastic, and the amount of goals he would have scored, would not be that different from what Erling will score. Imho.

But Haaland was/is the better long-term choice.
Click to expand...
Haaland is just a level above him, at 22 years old.

Kane would score 25 goals in this City team, maybe a few more, Haaland is on course to do significantly more than that.
 
Keeper! said:
Personally think we dodged a huge bullet, no doubting his qualities but for me , Arry is already well past his best.
Click to expand...

Nowhere near past his best. He's a different player now than the one he was a few years back but he's much more well rounded. He's lot a bit of pace but he was never some sort of speed merchant anyway.

There's only Benzema in world football who can match him for his all round game when Kane is fit and at his best. Both are better players than Lewandowski. He's got 8 goals in 10 Premier League games this season, Kane, so in a much better team than Spurs and one that creates for him, instead of him often being the chief creater, he would also score bucket loads in a City shirt. I'm extremely glad we got Haaland. But we certainly didn't dodge a bullet.
 
Octavian said:
Haaland is just a level above him, at 22 years old.

Kane would score 25 goals in this City team, maybe a few more, Haaland is on course to do significantly more than that.
Click to expand...

Christ. He would score far more than that if he stayed free of injury and started every week. We would generally create for him in one game what his Tottenham team mates do for him in one month. He also wouldn't need to drop deep all the time for us as he often feels the need to for Spurs, so would be in the box a hell of a lot more.
 
Octavian said:
Haaland is just a level above him, at 22 years old.

Kane would score 25 goals in this City team, maybe a few more, Haaland is on course to do significantly more than that.
Click to expand...
It’s hard to judge. Kane is far better as an all round player now and would score a large number of goals.

He’s also not worth £100m.

Haaland is already showing he is learning our buildup, but Kane would score crazy goal in our side.
 
iTyler said:
Nowhere near past his best. He's a different player now than the one he was a few years back but he's much more well rounded. He's lot a bit of pace but he was never some sort of speed merchant anyway.

There's only Benzema in world football who can match him for his all round game when Kane is fit and at his best. Both are better players than Lewandowski. He's got 8 goals in 10 Premier League games this season, Kane, so in a much better team than Spurs and one that creates for him, instead of him often being the chief creater, he would also score bucket loads in a City shirt. I'm extremely glad we got Haaland. But we certainly didn't dodge a bullet.
Click to expand...
Respect your view, but I am so glad Daniel did not take our offer and the Viking became our striker.
 
Keeper! said:
Respect your view, but I am so glad Daniel did not take our offer and the Viking became our striker.
Click to expand...

I think most are and I'm no exception to that. But Kane would have been a superb signing for a few seasons. Haaland is a lot younger but may only be here for a few years himself before moving on.
 
iTyler said:
I think most are and I'm no exception to that. But Kane would have been a superb signing for a few seasons. Haaland is a lot younger but may only be here for a few years himself before moving on.
Click to expand...
But we can move him on at a huge profit, Kane would have had no resale value.
 
iTyler said:
I think most are and I'm no exception to that. But Kane would have been a superb signing for a few seasons. Haaland is a lot younger but may only be here for a few years himself before moving on.
Click to expand...
Stop listening to the bloody media. ABSOLUTELY NO REASON FOR HIM TO MOVE ON. HE'S AT THE BEST CLUB IN WORLD FOOTBALL. I've highlighted it because so many on here follow the media shite that we're a tinpot club and everyone wants to leave.
 
TonyColemansbagofapples said:
Stop listening to the bloody media. ABSOLUTELY NO REASON FOR HIM TO MOVE ON. HE'S AT THE BEST CLUB IN WORLD FOOTBALL. I've highlighted it because so many on here follow the media shite that we're a tinpot club and everyone wants to leave.
Click to expand...

That's a bit strong. There are loads of reasons why he might want to move on. Doesn't say anything about us as a club, just depends on what he wants in his career.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top