no ? next year he is available for £67 million
so just double our offer and pay £120 million now for haaland
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
no ? next year he is available for £67 million
so just double our offer and pay £120 million now for haaland
I mean, Kane also made something of a mug out of Dias and Laporte with his movement and play when Tottenham last beat us.yes a gamble but he is a monster of a striker and would bully the defenders
he did Dias last season in the champions league but ederson saved his bacon
The price is irrelevant. This is Monopoly moneyi understand why ? but the price is wrong for me
no guarantees and has had injury problems. winning the champions league would only be our saving grace
i just think if we let haaland go to chelsea or dare i say united then it could come back to bite us
can we live without getting kane maybe ? but could we still be top dogs if chelsea or united got haaland
The price is irrelevant. This is Monopoly money
its is ? but there has to be a limit
just take i look at barcelona and the so called elite clubs in debt and in a right mess ?
David Silva
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 986
no ? next year he is available for £67 million
so just double our offer and pay £120 million now for haaland
If Haaland was available at that price Chelsea would have signed him last week
I mean, Kane also made something of a mug out of Dias and Laporte with his movement and play when Tottenham last beat us.
am not saying kane is not world class he is
but its the fee for a 28 year old it does not add up unless we win the champions league
The Pandorica Opened
Well-Known Member
think we will sell Jesus and Bernardo myself. 60 million and maybe 50 and end up with a minimal net spend. Laporte will be told he has to give it a go this year and we can sell him and ake next year and buy a good holding midfielder and a great left back and promote sandler as third choice centre back. Stones and Dias are sound for the next few years.
Don't see us selling both Ake and Laporte. I think this year will decide which one goes - if Stones has another blinder with Dias, Laporte will go as he's far too good to play back up. If Stones falters and Laporte gets back into the team, Ake will be sold and Stones will be the rotation option. Can't see us going from having arguably the best set of four CBs in the league to having Sandler being the rotation option in one season.
dannyboiblue
Well-Known Member
Don't see us selling both Ake and Laporte. I think this year will decide which one goes - if Stones has another blinder with Dias, Laporte will go as he's far too good to play back up. If Stones falters and Laporte gets back into the team, Ake will be sold and Stones will be the rotation option. Can't see us going from having arguably the best set of four CBs in the league to having Sandler being the rotation option in one
This is not slagging anyone but if laporte is good enough he gets himself back in the team! The best players rise to the top. Average players shit themselves and aim for the exit. Let's see who's got the balls
dannyboiblue
Well-Known Member
If spurs get Martinez kane is ours
Well it isn't though is it?The price is irrelevant. This is Monopoly money
FFP and books to balance say spunking 160m out on a player will mean less to spend in another season, unless we sell ourselves to balance the books.