At Anfield when a goal is needed and the time added on is manipulated!
Last edited:
CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)
- Thread starter jimharri
- Start date
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
I've spotted the little game you've played with the final username at the bottom of your post....;)While over at Comedy Central - hope they understand why the Premier League was formed and what role they played in it
Re: FSG discussion thread
« Reply #7409 on: Today at 09:14:53 am »
Quote from: JRed on Today at 08:56:04 am
Its been said on here before and I agree, we need to break away from the PL, go back into the Football League and take the money with us. Us and the Mancs, plus Arsenal, have the pull. The owners should speak to the other clubs, to the exclusion of Abu Dhabi and Saudis (is Chelsea OK now seeing as they aren't owned by Abramovich?) to take the path of going back to the League and taking the money with us. Amazon for example would love to get hold of the rights to any league with us in it. I bet the football league would love us back in their structure properly, with a better drip down of funds to the lower league. Maybe we can get rid of the FA in total?
And fuck UEFA, if they refuse us the places in the CL, all that will do is harm their competition. Anfield nights draw millions for their TV audience and it could also re-ignite the ESL and if done properly this time, with access to all teams in all of Europes top divisions, then it could be made to be a goer. UEFA are as fucking corrupt as FIFA, so I have no qualms about ruining those c*nts.
« Last Edit: Today at 09:20:19 am by robbed1966kidsbikesoffsanta »
It is the timing from when the Investigatory Chamber sat down under the watchful eye of Rick Parry to the punishment, pre agreed with Liverpool and the G14, being announced.
Then City, the absolute bastards, had the temerity to appeal to CAS. You can’t trust people with brown skin.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 15,034
That's not giving up, that's being well and truly beaten.
Manchester City banned from Champions League for two seasons
Manchester City have been banned from the Champions League for two seasons, from 2020-21, and fined €30m by Uefawww.theguardian.com
This article confirms City was charged by UEFA in May 2019, with the judgement and punishment delivered in February 2020.
Edit. Thanks @nmc for the PM. Would you care to give us the evidence that supports your position that City was investigated by UEFA, charged by UEFA, and punished by UEFA all within a period of 24 hours? On here will be ok, so everyone gets the benefit of your insight. Oh, and perhaps omit the personal abuse too.
For the record, from the CAS document:
November 2018 Articles published
December 2018 City asked about articles
March 2019 Investigation opened by IC
March and April 2019 Hearings
May 2019 Leaks
May 2019 Decision referred to AC
May and June 2019 More leaks
January 2020 Complaint about leaks
January 2020 Hearing
February 2020 Decision issued by AC
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
That timeline shows how tactical those leaks were. The timing was designed for maximum negative impact on City. No wonder City stopped co-operating and went straight to Cas. Those leaks came from the IC and no action was taken against the culprit who was given another top job in English football. Just pure corruption. Organised and clear as Khaldoon said.
Exactly..
And on the odd occasion since the CAS judgement when I've discussed the whole farrago with friends and other johnnies who support other clubs, I've shut them down with just one comment, along the lines of:
'Oh and let's not forget that two of the so-called 'incriminating' e-mithers selected from many thousands of documents obtained illegally to form the basis of the case against City, were found by CAS to have been doctored to make them look like one highly explosive piece of evidence of wrong-doing by City. Now then, I wonder who did that and why? Any thoughts?'
Usually shuts down the partial f**ckers..
Last edited:
It’s really odd.
footballleaks obtain millions of emails/docs from many clubs via exfiltration.
Result, only 5/6 (cut and shut doctored) emails regarding just City are publicly published and used to go after just one club.
I really can’t work out the ‘clear and obvious’ reason for this very odd unbalanced singular state of data leaking…
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
How laughable this case was that Uefa’s evidence at the CAS were print outs of the emails. Could you imagine the victim cries and support from the British press if this had happened to Liverpool, there would be wall to wall Panorma programs and the local mp calling for education on how corrupt Uefa are to be taught in schools.
Not a peep from the U.K. press when there is a story there to be told how corrupt Uefa are.
“We will not be providing any comment on out of context materials purported to have been hacked or stolen from City Football Group and Manchester City personnel and associated people. The attempt to damage the club's reputation is organised and clear."
Devil's Advocate
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Aug 2022
- Messages
- 165
There were 100s of Football Leaks articles from 2016 onwards involving multiple clubs, players and agents and lots of shit thrown elsewhere. We were just the most high profile:)
Links here but many won't work now. They are different URLs.
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
How many lead to bans being sanctioned without due process ?There were 100s of Football Leaks articles from 2016 onwards involving multiple clubs, players and agents and lots of shit thrown elsewhere. We were just the most high profile:)
Links here but many won't work now. They are different URLs.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
How many of them even led to investigations against the clubs concerned. In Portugal the response of the authorities was to investigate, arrest, and prosecute Rui Pinto the hacker of the emails.
The English press hailed Pinto as a hero but the Portugese authorities take a different view and his ongoing court case doesn't seem to be going well for him. The UK media have suddenly gone quiet on Pinto. I wonder why?
Pinto's claims of being a whistleblower were somewhat undermined when he demanded huge sums of cash from one of his victims not to release the material.
Pinto latest here:
Homepage - Archysport
Dont Miss Featured Facebook-f Like our Facebook page Youtube Watch our YouTube videos Twitter Follow us on Twitter Trending Most popular The latest on what’s moving world, in your inbox every morning
www.archysport.com
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
And yet some think we’re all treated the same.
StillBluessinceHydeRoad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2020
- Messages
- 2,462
- Team supported
- City
It is interesting that the action against Juve has been instigated by the prosecutors in Turin on the grounds that those responsible for the club had falsified accounts in several ways over a matter of years. UEFA had reached an agreement with the club in August to bring the club back into conformity with FFP, but this is a relatively minor matter - if it is of any significance at all compared to false accounting. This is tepid compared to the accusations of inflating sponsorship deals and paying them ourselves to ourselves based on nothing but 6(?) stolen emails which proved nothing. UEFA will only "cooperate" with the national authorities but may take further action against Juve if they have misled them. I don't think Juve will need to worry too much about UEFA if they are found guilty in the courts of false accounting tax evasion and fraud! This leniency from UEFA could be because they are dealing with one of their own or it could be that they have learnt some sense from the humiliation suffered at City's hands. What do you think lads?
nmc
Well-Known Member
Interesting that Pinto claims not to know what extortion is - but he tried to make off with circa £300m. The British press I guess are still clinging the the fantasy that he’s some latter day Robin Hood ?
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
Centurions
Well-Known Member
He wasn't going to keep the money though, it was a test and proof that the agent was guilty if he'd paid. That must be true as Pinto said so.
He would have given the money he stole from the Caribbean(?) bank back but they got closed down when they went bust or got prosecuted so he sadly had to keep it.
Edit: The Cayman Isles, and it was two separate banks.
Dirty John: The dark side of Rui Pinto - josimarfootball.com
Der Spiegel and other newspapers hail him as an important whistleblower, but five years ago Rui Pinto obtained 268,000 euro from two bank accounts in the Cayman Islands through hacking. Then he turned to football.
josimarfootball.com
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 12,984
He wasn't going to keep the money though, it was a test and proof that the agent was guilty if he'd paid. That must be true as Pinto said so.
He would have given the money he stole from the Caribbean(?) bank back but they got closed down when they went bust or got prosecuted so he sadly had to keep it.
Edit: The Cayman Isles, and it was two separate banks.
Dirty John: The dark side of Rui Pinto - josimarfootball.com
Der Spiegel and other newspapers hail him as an important whistleblower, but five years ago Rui Pinto obtained 268,000 euro from two bank accounts in the Cayman Islands through hacking. Then he turned to football.
I still don’t understand how Der Spiegel have not committed a crime. Surely it’s similar to receiving stolen goods.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
They're "journalists", they can do what they want as it's in the public's interest.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 15,034
He wasn't going to keep the money though, it was a test and proof that the agent was guilty if he'd paid. That must be true as Pinto said so.
He would have given the money he stole from the Caribbean(?) bank back but they got closed down when they went bust or got prosecuted so he sadly had to keep it.
Edit: The Cayman Isles, and it was two separate banks.
Dirty John: The dark side of Rui Pinto - josimarfootball.com
Der Spiegel and other newspapers hail him as an important whistleblower, but five years ago Rui Pinto obtained 268,000 euro from two bank accounts in the Cayman Islands through hacking. Then he turned to football.
The Caymans, you say? :)