Lavinda Past
Well-Known Member
Why then do we have 5 PL titles but 0 CL?
Why do Liverpool only have one PL title, but 2 CL?
Why then do we have 5 PL titles but 0 CL?
I think @1961_vintage was pointing out your 'over-respectful' references to the rags and the GPC using their media titles...Mate Pep is arguably the greatest manager off all time it's not exactly bizarre thing to say the quality Could drop when he leaves
Why do people keep bringing this up? Will this perceived "agenda" end if we don't win the CL? Or will it worsen? Will the agenda change tack if we win more league titles? I don't get this rationale from some of our fans. Do you reckon Arsenal or Spurs would reject a CL because they've not won the same amount as United and Liverpool? You should want us to win the one big trophy that eludes us for ourselves, for the players, and for the manager.For those of you who think winning the champions league will get people off our backs. NEVER it will be only won 1 or 2 etc. Pep another 5 years gets my vote without a shadow of doubt. CTID
Why do Liverpool only have one PL title, but 2 CL?
Well firstly we're talking about the difficulty of winning the CL in the context of our club, and the weak mentality we seem to have in this particular competition. But anyway, why do Liverpool have 19 league titles and 6 European Cups? Why did Fergie win 13 league titles and only 2 CLs? What would he say is the harder to win? There's not a single metric or statistic that supports the claim the CL is easier to win. There's zero margin for error in a CL final. Liverpool moaned last summer but they weren't clinical enough against Madrid on the night, shitbust.Why do Liverpool only have one PL title, but 2 CL?
I used to say this kind of stuff but I’ve feel that I was just being silly. It’s a daft attitude to have and completely unhelpful to the football club we support. After the semifinals against Real Madrid last season I feel like I’ve matured around my attitude towards the Champions League and and I ‘get it’ now.I'll never accept the CL as a proper competition. It's a contrived cash cow designed specifically to benefit 'select' clubs. The inclusion of clubs that aren't champions of their own national league is UEFA pandering to the likes of the rags, Milan clubs, Barcelona, etc.
The simple fact that you can come fourth in your domestic league and second in the CL group, and be 'Champions" of all Europe, is risible.
The European Cup was a proper competition. A genuine knockout competition. The CL pales in comparison. I'd rather win the Carabao Cup.
It’s a silly question really. Why can’t we win the Champions League with Pep and he stays for five more years as well?!I'm shocked any city fan would accept Pep going this summer...even if we won a treble. Be careful what you wish for fellow blues.
For those of you who think winning the champions league will get people off our backs. NEVER it will be only won 1 or 2 etc. Pep another 5 years gets my vote without a shadow of doubt. CTID
HahaUntil last week I would have voted differently, but his rants after beating the Spuds to mash makes me think he is keeping his options open. If the players respond (as I think they will) he will stay, but if they don’t he will go if no significant trophies this season.
Well firstly we're talking about the difficulty of winning the CL in the context of our club, and the weak mentality we seem to have in this particular competition. But anyway, why do Liverpool have 19 league titles and 6 European Cups? Why did Fergie win 13 league titles and only 2 CLs? What would he say is the harder to win? There's not a single metric or statistic that supports the claim the CL is easier to win. There's zero margin for error in a CL final. Liverpool moaned last summer but they weren't clinical enough against Madrid on the night, shitbust.
If it were easier to win we'd have one by now, it's as simple as that.
If we wasn't champions and continously winning things they would move on to the next successful team. So long may it continue. CTIDI agree. The jealousy regarding our success is the reason that this is thrown at Pep and the club.
The media have been employed by certain teams to use whatever narrative in order to try and play down our success.
The rags and dippers use the media because they are unable to compete with City on the pitch.
It will continue even if we win it, we have upset the mardarses big style, and they kick back with the only thing they can use.
However well run we are the drop off will be huge, this guy is very unique and special and we have him in his prime.
So, basically, we haven't won it because we haven't been good enough. Having a brainfart when you reach the business end of the tournament is poor. Likewise, VAR didn't shaft us; Agüero was offside and we shouldn't have been in that position against Spurs in the first place. See Liverpool, Lyon, Madrid last season. We've never been good enough in this tournament and a lot of that is on Pep.We haven't won it because of VAR v Spurs and Pep having a brainfart when it got to the business end of the tournament.
Personally, I don't think we'll win it under Pep, and probably not u der his successor. Not because I don't like the competition, but because I just don’t think we're destined to.
We'll win the Super League in 5 years though
:-)
Haven’t been good enough? The bookies don’t make us favourites out of the goodness of their heart. We have been good enough, we have been better than the recent winners, any eyeball test demonstrates that. It will happen one day, maybe even one season when we DON’T deserve it.So, basically, we haven't won it because we haven't been good enough. Having a brainfart when you reach the business end of the tournament is poor. Likewise, VAR didn't shaft us; Agüero was offside and we shouldn't have been in that position against Spurs in the first place. See Liverpool, Lyon, Madrid last season. We've never been good enough in this tournament and a lot of that is on Pep.