This is the point I've been making - even if we're guilty, how can they prove it?
That's my hope, we'll worry about the rest later.Wow. I really do believe that this pack of hyenas phenomenon could sting us into performing together on the pitch the way we haven't all season and come back to bite the PL and the media on the arse, big time.
The big worry is Peps future at City now , he cited political reasons , and his constant expectation to fend off the press and fans at Barcelona, as a result , make no mistake about - city have just become political overnight , he hates the press as it is , and now the prodding and questioning will increase tenfold , I hate to say it , but I fear the end is coming for Peps time at City , guilty or innocent , this shit has just got serious.
doubt he will he moved papersto the times weeks ago and went all anti-city in his first pieceHope Martin Samuel in the Mail has a good look at this and writes a piece. He seems to get to the truth when he writes about City.
Has no bearing on the outcome but I think City want to point out that it's been orchestrated by/for the usual suspects. Given the initial PL statement had many mistakes in too they want to give the optics that it's a rushed though shit show.
I got 99 problems, but a left back aint oneThat could be made into a song like the 10 green bottles sitting on a wall song.
Why?Soriano particularly needs to speak up now!
Must listen imo
beat me to itI just compared the original statement to the updated one and it's really not as big as the club are implying (though I can see why lawyers would find it amusing or annoying). They initially listed 1d - 1h as "premier league rules 16" when they meant "B16". See below. So possibly a sign of it being rushed, and certainly a typo, but not exactly a smoking gun.
View attachment 68266
He won’t.We’ll be still waiting for an outcome for your 60th.
Ha, we can be the absolute worst nerds together.beat me to it
Agreed. Say nothing. No need.Why?
Said the same today, what a lovely round figure to squeeze out for the frenzied feral city hating fansSo let me get this right that we are charged with not 5, not 50, not 99, but 100 indiscretions. That's a nice round figure for the media to get their teeth in.
Are any other PL clubs charged or to be charged? I am damned sure that most will be responsible for many, many indiscretions of their own over the same period and beyond.
I just hope the club come out with all guns firing.This may be the last chance saloon as THEY are determined to derail our wonderful club.
Yep not comparable in the slightestI can’t remember all the circumstances but weren’t you deducted 12 points for going into administration ?
Thanks for that.View attachment 68261
Hope that explains it a bit more.
100% racismSo, essentially, we're saying it's a racist agenda. I'm not necessarily disputing that conclusion, merely curious as to what fans believe is responsible for the apparent disparity in treatment.