PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Do you think Jack and Martin are similar in the quality of their copy?
Do you think Jack and Martin are similar in the quality of their copy?

You do realise my response was to someone who asked what organisation Jack Gaughan worked for with the inference being the ‘said’ organisation would not give City a fair hearing, when clearly, with Martin Samuels writing, it has in relation to issues surrounding FFP.

Not relevant your point about quality of writing. Totally different discussion.
 
Last edited:
You do realise my response was to someone who asked what organisation Jack Gaughan worked for with the inference being the ‘said’ organisation would not give City a fair hearing, when clearly, with Martin Samuels writing, it has in relation to issues surrounding FFP.

Totally irrelevant your point about quality of writing. Totally different discussion.
@franksinatra - come on, have you seen the state of the City reporting in the DM, in comparison to other clubs? The Media thread is full of their cheap shots, lies and innuendo. Their hatred of our club is beyond question.
 
@franksinatra - come on, have you seen the state of the City reporting in the DM, in comparison to other clubs? The Media thread is full of their cheap shots, lies and innuendo. Their hatred of our club is beyond question.

Hi Dodge,

Thanks for the message. I totally get what you are saying cant stand the mail, sun or pretty much any media outlet. I just think if we have some info which could embarass the Premier League, as much as they may not like us, I think they would enjoy even more making headlines with a corruption scandal and either way its better to have the news out there than not at all.

Fully respect though Its your info to share, but I just think I would not let a dislike for an organisation stop you as in this instance you could use them. Just like the club does releasing stories to favoured journalists even if the same organisation sticks the boot in a lot of the time.
 
@franksinatra - come on, have you seen the state of the City reporting in the DM, in comparison to other clubs? The Media thread is full of their cheap shots, lies and innuendo. Their hatred of our club is beyond question.
Which newspaper would you have given information to?
 
Hi Dodge,

Thanks for the message. I totally get what you are saying cant stand the mail, sun or pretty much any media outlet. I just think if we have some info which could embarass the Premier League, as much as they may not like us, I think they would enjoy even more making headlines with a corruption scandal and either way its better to have the news out there than not at all.

Fully respect though Its your info to share, but I just think I would not let a dislike for an organisation stop you as in this instance you could use them. Just like the club does releasing stories to favoured journalists even if the same organisation sticks the boot in a lot of the time.
Haha, the media's biggest arse kisser on here saying they can't stand any media outlet, just when you think you have seen it all on Bluemoon.!
 
@tolmie's hairdoo has worked in the media, shall we discount what he says?

Despite a media outlet being against us there are some journalists who work for them who are fair to us. Jack Gaughan in the Mail, Simon Mullock in the Mirror. They get stories from City. When the rest of the media were jizzing themselves over the thought of us being relegated they said differently.

Anyway, the VAR stuff will just remain a football, fansite fantasy.
 
@tolmie's hairdoo has worked in the media, shall we discount what he says?

Despite a media outlet being against us there are some journalists who work for them who are fair to us. Jack Gaughan in the Mail, Simon Mullock in the Mirror. They get stories from City. When the rest of the media were jizzing themselves over the thought of us being relegated they said differently.

Anyway, the VAR stuff will just remain a football, fansite fantasy.
Martin Blackburn is very reliable.
Decent bloke too, probably why he gets good insights into what is going on
 
Yeah, you know all about complex debate, the biggest media arse kisser on here trying to rewrite his thousands of posts nearly all in the media thread by now pretending he can't stand the media, disingenuous troll, that's all you are, the Neil Harris of Bluemoon.

Yeah, you know all about complex debate, the biggest media arse kisser on here trying to rewrite his thousands of posts nearly all in the media thread by now pretending he can't stand the media, disingenuous troll, that's all you are, the Neil Harris of Bluemoon.

Its a little pointless really discussing things with you, particularly debates a number of years ago.

I have better things to do in my life than exchange insults over the internet. Not my bag sadly. So I will wish you a good evening.
 
@tolmie's hairdoo has worked in the media, shall we discount what he says?

Despite a media outlet being against us there are some journalists who work for them who are fair to us. Jack Gaughan in the Mail, Simon Mullock in the Mirror. They get stories from City. When the rest of the media were jizzing themselves over the thought of us being relegated they said differently.

Anyway, the VAR stuff will just remain a football, fansite fantasy.

That @tolmie's hairdoo reckons we are signing Pele next summer.
 
Hi Dodge,

Thanks for the message. I totally get what you are saying cant stand the mail, sun or pretty much any media outlet. I just think if we have some info which could embarass the Premier League, as much as they may not like us, I think they would enjoy even more making headlines with a corruption scandal and either way its better to have the news out there than not at all.

Fully respect though Its your info to share, but I just think I would not let a dislike for an organisation stop you as in this instance you could use them. Just like the club does releasing stories to favoured journalists even if the same organisation sticks the boot in a lot of the time.
Surely you would have to have evidence for it to be published and that purported evidence seems to reside with the club, not Dodge.

If true, it would be any holder of the evidence to report, not an ITK.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top