Illegal PL streaming - 11 years in prison for "gang" leader.

Gremlin said:
140 quid a month? Must have loads of extras in for that. I use NowTV and pay £30/month which gets me all of the Sky games (and my lad watches the F1 on that as well) plus I get BTTV for free with my broadband package.
Click to expand...

You are "a SKY sales rep" and I claim my £5.
 
Bazzmand Show said:
To me this is still way to expensive considering you get like 3 live games a week?

Something has to be done about the 3pm blackout imo - because at the moment, I cannot justify paying for the little live football that is actually on.
Click to expand...
Rubbish. You get more than three on Saturday and Sunday. I watched boxing last Saturday etc.
 
SKY & BT are never, ever, getting a single solitary penny off me. That much is for sure. They can both fuck right off!
 
Mr Kobayashi said:
So it's poor value if you just want to watch your own team's games and don't want to spend the whole weekend watching sport.
Click to expand...
I enjoy watching all matches plus boxing. Subscribe to this illegal streaming and you’re responsible for these men being imprisoned.
 
MCFC Wirral said:
I enjoy watching all matches plus boxing. Subscribe to this illegal streaming and you’re responsible for these men being imprisoned.
Click to expand...

Yes I got that. Just putting the other perspective. If you are a supporter a lesser PL team you might be getting two live games a month, could go watch a non league game for a similar cost of the personalised per match cost.

I've never subscribed to any of these services nor would I, I don't pay people for IP they don't own that I could get for free and that has no guarantees about reliability.

A legal service from an overseas broadcaster and a VPN is a more attractive option to try next season.
 
Mr Kobayashi said:
Yes I got that. Just putting the other perspective. If you are a supporter a lesser PL team you might be getting two live games a month, could go watch a non league game for a similar cost of the personalised per match cost.

I've never subscribed to any of these services nor would I, I don't pay people for IP they don't own that I could get for free and that has no guarantees about reliability.

A legal service from an overseas broadcaster and a VPN is a more attractive option to try next season.
Click to expand...

Those “legal” broadcasters from other countries and then using a vpn ain’t legal here!
 
waspish said:
Those “legal” broadcasters from other countries and then using a vpn ain’t legal here!
Click to expand...

Yes I'm aware. It's also breach of the user agreement so if they catch you then you risk getting your account blocked so not 100% reliable.

It’s preferable to giving money to dodgy blokes on the internet though.

It’s not something anyone is ever likely to get prosecuted for unless you monetise or broadcast to others, which I have no intention of.
 
A question I have about the 3 o'clock blackout in the UK. The rest of the world can subscribe and watch but not the UK. It can't be because of reduced gates at the games Shirley?
 
RadcliffeRick said:
A question I have about the 3 o'clock blackout in the UK. The rest of the world can subscribe and watch but not the UK. It can't be because of reduced gates at the games Shirley?
Click to expand...
The law was introduced around 60 years ago years ago to stop attendances at games being reduced especially in lower leagues.

The only time it was withdrawn was during the pandemic
 
kippaxwarrior said:
The law was introduced around 60 years ago years ago to stop attendances at games being reduced especially in lower leagues.

The only time it was withdrawn was during the pandemic
Click to expand...


Now that clubs have sold their arses for cash, that 3'oclock nonsense should be rescinded.
 
I dont know anyone who supports a lower league team who wouldn't go if there was a 3pm PL kick off on the telly, particularly as these days you can replay the matches on demand.
 
Mr Kobayashi said:
It’s not the clubs that have sold their arses for cash that are supposed to benefit from it.
Click to expand...

Those clubs are very unlikely to be televised though, I remember getting giddy seeing cameras at Maine Rd seeing the cameras and knowing we would be on match of the day.
 
mexico1970 said:
Those clubs are very unlikely to be televised though, I remember getting giddy seeing cameras at Maine Rd seeing the cameras and knowing we would be on match of the day.
Click to expand...

Not directly but indirectly.

But their fanbases are also not as loyal and also more likely to be tempted to watch TV than go to watch kick and rush on a cold winter.

That’s the argument anyway, I suppose it's also a law from an era where there was less tribalism. Tbh the Premier league ought to just come to an agreement to give a fairer share to lower leagues to maintain their infrastructure and it could get away with a lift of the 3pm blackout.
 
Mr Kobayashi said:
Not directly but indirectly.

But their fanbases are also not as loyal and also more likely to be tempted to watch TV than go to watch kick and rush on a cold winter.

That’s the argument anyway, I suppose it's also a law from an era where there was less tribalism. Tbh the Premier league ought to just come to an agreement to give a fairer share to lower leagues to maintain their infrastructure and it could get away with a lift of the 3pm blackout.
Click to expand...

I would say that giving them a fair share would have merit, but the premier league and Championship have less need for smaller clubs now because they are farming their players from other countries.

It's a tricky one but this 3'oclock nonsense has to end specially the premier league ones IMHO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top