Declan Rice

Status
Not open for further replies.
JTFactsPlz said:
There's nothing about it being 100m upfront. It's 100m in cash + 5m add-ons but we don't know the structure of over what time period they're intending to pay the 100m.
Click to expand...
Says here the initial fee etc
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2267.png
    IMG_2267.png
    550.5 KB · Views: 110
Bluewonder said:
Love how as soon as something 'goes wrong' in one of our transfer pursuits, all of Bluemoon's wet wipes are on here saying we should sign 1 of 10 randomers for a random fee.

Do you still not realise that we target specific players for specific reasons?

We won't suddenly be throwing £80m at De Jong, Barella or any other random midfielder just because Arsenal have upped their bid.

7 years of Pep and you still don't get it.
Click to expand...
Top post. It's at times like this that I remember there's probably 13 year olds posting on here and that explains it.
 
ManCitizens. said:
Why? He’s West Ham’s player and it’s clear Arsenal are desperate, good luck to them
Click to expand...
I was listening to a couple of his interviews on YouTube earlier, and I get the impression that he wants to stay in London. I think they will probably give him the captaincy in a year or so if he signs. If there’s no one else out there we could go again. If we stop now, then we have done a maguire on them
 
Can’t see city matching that bid it’s a big jump to go from £85 to £100m.
 
It's done I reckon, I'd be very surprised if we match it. Not that we can't of course, but don't expect us to go that high.
 
Pollocks OG said:
Why are we assuming City will pull out now? Am I missing something?
Click to expand...
Common sense says we don’t go higher than Arsenal as he’s clearly not worth it. But the market doesn’t operate on what we think so yeah only City know if they’ll pull out or not. Maybe we’re truly invested in this
 
This is biggest bullshit transfer ever this guy Sullivan doesnt give a fuck about payment structure,he want Arsenal and City to do bidding war and when he somone give up next offer would be accepted.
Arsenal offer them two offers with less money with bad paying structure, and now they got more money who did they expect that to get better paying structure come this is joke.
They are not serious!
 
Gumzy97 said:
Click to expand...

So, the magic number has been reached. Sullivan, at least, isn't laughing at the number.

Anyway, Kovacic should show similar movements as Gundogan did, with less scoring. With Gvardiol, whose transfer hopefully would be completed, he and Stones can play in the middle, to rest Rodri. One more, of a winger, an attacking midfielder, or an 6/8, would be nice. Still, Foden and Alvarez would benefit by getting more minutes. The heaven hasn't fallen, yet, until the first loss.
 
Bluewonder said:
Love how as soon as something 'goes wrong' in one of our transfer pursuits, all of Bluemoon's wet wipes are on here saying we should sign 1 of 10 randomers for a random fee.

Do you still not realise that we target specific players for specific reasons?

We won't suddenly be throwing £80m at De Jong, Barella or any other random midfielder just because Arsenal have upped their bid.

7 years of Pep and you still don't get it.
Click to expand...
We have more than one back up for every target. Rice himself is a back up.
 
Something strange about that Arsenal bid. They wanted to pay 75m over 5 years, now they're offering 100m (and in the meantime, are spending big on Havertz and Timber).

Either they've found a lot of money from somewhere, or they're offering another long-term payment plan. If it's the latter, I'm not surprised West Ham aren't satisfied and want to bleed them dry.

Are they trying to raise the price for us, or scare us off?
 
That 110 number is maybe what they want on arsenals long term payment plan. Maybe we could get him for the 100+5 if payed quicker? Just guessing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top