PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Gordyola said:
It was DerSpiegel who led the cause against City they were the ones responsible for the doctoring for some of the leaked mails that UEFA based their case on led by the very enthusiastic, only when it was City, head of the UEFA investigative chamber Yves Leterme the disgraced Belgian PM
Click to expand...
In CAS 1 which we lost only because CAS said they had no jurisdiction, CAS were nevertheless scathing about Leterme saying that City could not get a fair hearing while he was in the chair. No doubt that helped in the full case-CAS2.
The PSG case which Leterme chaired at about the same time as ours was also corrupted by him when he unilaterally upped the value of the worldwide branding of Qatar tourism to Euro100m when the experts had advised it was worth about EURO 9. (Figs from memory).
UEFA appealed against their own verdict!!! Lost, due to no jurisdiction. YCNMIU.
 
deano ou812 said:
If and when it goes tits up,there’ll be a scramble to think something else up,but if we are completely cleared it’s the lasting effect that it has created in the minds of other fans that well we are still cheats and only got off as we paid them off or similar bollocks threw at us ..
Click to expand...
Khaldoon talked about the issue being settled once and for all with this case. Ha, some hope. It won’t stop the lies in the Grauniad and elsewhere unless the club reverse their policy and pursue them through the courts. A warning letter and a writ would probably be sufficient.
 
ICYMI a few hundred pages back…

“Undoubtedly, Etisalat will form a central part of the Premier League’s “115” (in reality, Manchester City are alleged to have broken 129 rules over 13 years) charges against Manchester City.

It once again highlights that those so determined to see Manchester City face “justice” feel the need to make their case by blurring the lines between allegation, evidence, innuendo and outright conspiracy theory. It serves as a stark reminder of the seriousness of the allegations made and, therefore, the strength of evidence that will be required to prove the case against them.”

Read the rest https://stefanborson.substack.com/p/conspiracy-theories-and-innuendo?utm_medium=ios


1688989709502.png
 
projectriver said:
ICYMI a few hundred pages back…

“Undoubtedly, Etisalat will form a central part of the Premier League’s “115” (in reality, Manchester City are alleged to have broken 129 rules over 13 years) charges against Manchester City.

It once again highlights that those so determined to see Manchester City face “justice” feel the need to make their case by blurring the lines between allegation, evidence, innuendo and outright conspiracy theory. It serves as a stark reminder of the seriousness of the allegations made and, therefore, the strength of evidence that will be required to prove the case against them.”

Read the rest https://stefanborson.substack.com/p/conspiracy-theories-and-innuendo?utm_medium=ios


View attachment 85968
Click to expand...

You not text the link to talksport with “For Jordan” [emoji3]
 
Probably not related at all but I think it is , funny how the naughty disgusting BBC employee is afforded anonymity before an enquiry, but city are guilty in the eyes of everyone without concrete facts isn’t it ? Hung drawn and quartered before facts come out ? For the record , I hope that the BBC employee gets what “maybe” coming to him. Apologies in advance to anyone who is offended by what I’ve said , different agendas completely, but we aren’t afforded the innocent until proven guilty are we ? The darling BBC eh ? You’d think they would have acted on this immediately with their track record , in no way am I downplaying what this toe rag has allegedly done, but the principle is the same.
 
flb said:
Probably not related at all but I think it is , funny how the naughty disgusting BBC employee is afforded anonymity before an enquiry, but city are guilty in the eyes of everyone without concrete facts isn’t it ? Hung drawn and quartered before facts come out ? For the record , I hope that the BBC employee gets what “maybe” coming to him. Apologies in advance to anyone who is offended by what I’ve said , different agendas completely, but we aren’t afforded the innocent until proven guilty are we ? The darling BBC eh ? You’d think they would have acted on this immediately with their track record , in no way am I downplaying what this toe rag has allegedly done, but the principle is the same.
Click to expand...
They knew back in may,obviously not as prolific but they covered up the whole jimmy saville debacle as he was one of their major stars fronting the popular and huge ratings winner Jim’ll fix it and top of the pops,they can fuck off for me..
 
deano ou812 said:
They knew back in may,obviously not as prolific but they covered up the whole jimmy saville debacle as he was one of their major stars fronting the popular and huge ratings winner Jim’ll fix it and top of the pops,they can fuck off for me..
Click to expand...
Is the correct answer , they can stick their TV license up there corrupt arse for me , the BBC is the bentest , most corrupt media organisation in this country by a long long way , from top to bottom in every single department they are bent , I’ve said it before , it’s the media that set every single agenda in this country , from politics to sport , absolutely everything they have their grubby little fingers in , the BBC are allegedly the flagship , corrupt , swilling around in the tax payers money , patting each other on the back at every single level , the self appreciation society in all its glory. Corrupt is too kind a word.
 
LongsightM13 said:
Think he’s already done plea deals with the police, prosecutors and tax authorities over there to share information in exchange for certain immunities?
Click to expand...
I think that was mentioned a good while back but this Thursday will see the verdict and (if guilty) the sentence at some point. This is for approximately 90 charges. Meanwhile within the last week they've given him another 377 charges. The last lot took 2 years...
 
LongsightM13 said:
Think he’s already done plea deals with the police, prosecutors and tax authorities over there to share information in exchange for certain immunities?
Click to expand...
I don't think he has done a good deal because they hit him with an extra 377 charges last week albeit lesser charges than extortion. It will be interesting to see what happens. The UK press will ignore it if he is guilty but if he is cleared it will be all systems go with the anti-City witchhunt.
 
flb said:
Probably not related at all but I think it is , funny how the naughty disgusting BBC employee is afforded anonymity before an enquiry, but city are guilty in the eyes of everyone without concrete facts isn’t it ? Hung drawn and quartered before facts come out ? For the record , I hope that the BBC employee gets what “maybe” coming to him. Apologies in advance to anyone who is offended by what I’ve said , different agendas completely, but we aren’t afforded the innocent until proven guilty are we ? The darling BBC eh ? You’d think they would have acted on this immediately with their track record , in no way am I downplaying what this toe rag has allegedly done, but the principle is the same.
Click to expand...
If only Dan Roan was a "household name".
 
GaudinoMotors said:
If only Dan Roan was a "household name".
Click to expand...
Whatever it is or happened will get swept under the BBC carpet , after all , another scandal will see the general public telling the BBC to stick their licensing fee up their arse , and for that alone will see people being bought off to keep quiet, there is too much revenue at risk for them , they can’t have another scandal erupting like the last one without a real uproar this time. The BBC are on thin ice , they have been for nigh on 50 years.
The point I’m making is City have been castigated, presumed guilty your honour , we literally are fighting a losing battle, the hypocrisy is astounding, let’s see if Jordan , or Piers fucking Morgan have the guts to question the trough they’ve got their noses in, will they fuck. Let’s pick on a football club instead.
 
Last edited:
flb said:
Whatever it is or happened will get swept under the BBC carpet , after all , another scandal will see the general public telling the BBC to stick their licensing fee up there arse , and for that alone will see people being bought off to keep quiet, there is too much revenue at risk for them , they can’t have another scandal erupting like the last one without a real uproar this time. The BBC are on thin ice , they have been for nigh on 50 years.
The point I’m making is City have been castigated, presumed guilty your honour , we literally are fighting a losing battle, the hypocrisy is astounding, let’s see if Jordan , or Piers fucking Morgan have the guts to question the trough they’ve got their noses in, will they fuck. Let’s pick on a football club instead.
Click to expand...
The alleged ‘victim’ is now outright denying anything happened tbf, for balance
 
LongsightM13 said:
The alleged ‘victim’ is now outright denying anything happened tbf, for balance
Click to expand...
That figures doesn’t it , for balance of course , but let’s ignore their past whilst we are at it , for balance of course. The BBC is just a tax dressed up as doing us all a favour through “content”. It’s a shoddy outfit , and has been for decades , they are the ultimate media “shill”. Feed the goons with shite - only sucked up because the word “British” is in their title to convince the masses.
 
flb said:
That figures doesn’t it , for balance of course , but let’s ignore their past whilst we are at it , for balance of course. The BBC is just a tax dressed up as doing us all a favour through “content”. It’s a shoddy outfit , and has been for decades , they are the ultimate media “shill”. Feed the goons with shite - only sucked up because the word “British” is in their title to convince the masses.
Click to expand...
And yet I’d still take them against actual far right psychopathic monsters like Murdoch and Rothermere who have been grooming and manipulating the more gullible and stupid sections of the UK population to hate the BBC for decades, just so they can make even more money
 
Last edited:
flb said:
That figures doesn’t it , for balance of course , but let’s ignore their past whilst we are at it , for balance of course. The BBC is just a tax dressed up as doing us all a favour through “content”. It’s a shoddy outfit , and has been for decades , they are the ultimate media “shill”. Feed the goons with shite - only sucked up because the word “British” is in their title to convince the masses.
Click to expand...

Personally, I think your sentiment refers to titles like the Sun far far more than the BBC tbh.

Don’t think it’s for this thread though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top