If you weren’t playing Haaland there surely play the other lad who’s actually in form and can hold the ball up and battle unlike Foden. Would never sub Haaland personally anyway when we’re trailing and it looks like neither will Pep.Spot on,i think everyone but Pep could see it.
If you weren’t playing Haaland there surely play the other lad who’s actually in form and can hold the ball up and battle unlike Foden. Would never sub Haaland personally anyway when we’re trailing and it looks like neither will Pep.
Nah mate, he was really shit today23 years old, arguably the most talented player on the planet. Had a quiet few months by his insanely high standards, but still has been absolutely world-class. Quiet today, but it's not his fault. He absorbs a lot of defenders and creates the necessary space for others. Sadly, we couldn't take advantage of it today.
Best finisher in the world but could he do ten keepie ups? Let’s get him up to the level where he can beat Bernardo at head tennis, Dias at squats and better Header of the ball than BernardoDon’t think he’s anywhere near the most talented player on the planet. Physically yes but in terms of touch, technique, skill etc he’s miles off. Not slagging him off we’re incredibly lucky to have him but he has many things he’ll hopefully improve on.
Today yes but in previous games without Kev we’ve created shitloads for him. Unusually for him he’s been missing a lot of sitters. Today the service to him was nonexistent and so was any link play or hold up play from the big man.This lad needs Kev back sharpish. His supply line has been cut.
Aston Villa 3-1 home victory last February.It's been my theory for a while now that Haaland has it in his contract that he will start every PL and UCL game unless injured, and he cannot be subbed off unless he has already scored or gets injured.
If anyone can disprove this theory with facts, not only would I be interested but kind of relieved because my theory has Pep's hands tied in a way I don't think is great for the team. But I can't think of a single time the above theory can be disproved.