Middle East Conflict

Honestly anyone who thinks they know exactly who hit the hospital can probably be written off as one eyed and partisan.

It’s not certain either way, and it likely won’t be for some time.

I’ve said before I’m 75/25 in favour of Islamists doing it, but I’d feel foolish thinking I knew for certain based on the tiny amount of evidence released so far.
 
Don Karleone said:
It seems so.
Click to expand...
Why though? GeoConfirmed are highly respected as being factual and base their investigations on the information that is provided, not on political alignments. They are neither Israeli nor Palestinian biased, just as their analysis on the Ukraine/Russian invasion is based on facts, not politics. They don't choose sides, just purport the facts from the information provided.

Their view is that, given the evidence of the many video footages provided, that the rocket/missile coudl only have been fired from within Gaza and the warhead landed unintentionally on the car park.

What is Forensic Architechtures angle?
 
salfordbluetrue said:
You used a lot of names there, but missed the only 2 that matter, it has been going on for thousands of years, books that were meant for survival and education have been butchered and used to justify atrocities, it will not end until religion is erased from the planet.
Click to expand...
Then we'll find another handy reason to kill each other.
 


There is additional feedback from GeoComfirmed.

The rocket failing the way it did seems to have resulted in a direction change mid flight. It explains the other forensic analysis about directional damage.
 
MouldensChippy said:
Whatever the cabal have picked up that conforms with their particular view I presume.
Click to expand...

Well given I posted geoconfirmed’s analysis first on here too that corroborated Israel’s position, I’d argue anyone posting that (or liking it) is probably projecting that behaviour you’re accusing others of themselves…;)

Not everyone has a particular view, I’d argue anyone rational wouldn’t given there’s been no direct independent investigation.

To reiterate again, I said I hope Biden is correct in his analysis as if he’s backed the IDFs version of events and they turn out to be false, then that isn’t good for anyone.
 
Last edited:
grunge said:


There is additional feedback from GeoComfirmed.

The rocket failing the way it did resulted in a direction change mid flight. It explains the other forensic analysis about directional damage.
Click to expand...

i.e. it was never intended to hit the hospital
 
Metal Biker said:
i.e. it was never intended to hit the hospital
Click to expand...

Yep, clear as day who ever fires this missile it didn’t go to plan and didn’t land where it was aimed.

GeoConfirmed also suggesting no interception as iron some explodes to kill missiles and there was no explosion as the rocket failed ( there was after )

Maybe iron beam if there was an interception.
 
Postman Pep said:
I'd never heard of geo confirmed until the other night tbf. So I looked into their background .... very spooky.
Click to expand...

It's a website/ twitter account run by volunteers who are IT professionals.

I.e. former Reddit moderators and Wikipedia hobbyists.

Not weapons experts, not military veterans or any other relevant specialism.

Anybody expecting expert analysis from the basement dwellers is probably being a bit overoptimistic.
 
Mr Kobayashi said:
It's a website/ twitter account run by volunteers who are IT professionals.

I.e. former Reddit moderators and Wikipedia hobbyists.

Not weapons experts, not military veterans or any other relevant specialism.

Anybody expecting expert analysis from the basement dwellers is probably being a bit overoptimistic.
Click to expand...

They don’t provide military analysis from what I’ve seen. They geo locate events. Which is all they have done here.
 
grunge said:
They don’t provide military analysis from what I’ve seen. They geo locate events. Which is all they have done here.
Click to expand...

They do more than that to be fair. On both of their threads on it they use analysis of previous rocket explosions and also audio to formulate the starting point.

Both of those are critical points in their analysis and have been disputed by other very credible sources.

We’ll never really know until independent investigators get there, if ever.
 
Mr Kobayashi said:
So it's the fault of people reading too much into it then.
Click to expand...

Not a lot to read into it. Factually speaking ( using current evidence) A rocket launched from Gaza malfunctioned ( or intercepted in some way ), malfunction caused a direction change and it landed on the hospital area.
 
meltonblue said:
They do more than that to be fair. On both of their threads on it they use analysis of previous rocket explosions and also audio to formulate the starting point.

Both of those are critical points in their analysis and have been disputed by other very credible sources.

We’ll never really know until independent investigators get there, if ever.
Click to expand...

Other than the forensic tweet that is entirely based on directional marks I’ve not seen anything. Can you share links please.

Edit. Am keeping an open mind on all of this as I wouldn’t put it past Israel. Just looking at the evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top