PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

The thing with the media, opposing fans and the likes of spitty c*nt is that not a single one of them will have a clue what the "115 charges" are, it just sounds a lot.

This was why the cartel communicated it as such 'it just sounds bad'. But you can't judge seriousness on a number.

An analogy would be like claiming someone with 114 minor driving convictions has to be far worse than someone with 1 murder conviction.

The above doesn't even take into account that most of the 115 charges are actually dissected components of a much much smaller number of broader charges. As above, you have to query the motive behind communicating the larger number of 'symptoms' rather than the overarching root causes
 
East Level 2 said:
My main concern is that charges against Everton, and the threat by Leeds and another couple of relegated clubs to sue Everton or the PL, means it's more unlikely the PL will be allowed to let the charges against City sit in the corner and gather dust. I'm not suggesting we are guilty but that doesn't mean we won't be found guilty.
Click to expand...
The quicker the PL try and rush it through the better as their gathered evidence will be even more shambolic than anticipated
 
CatMan said:
Just remind me what 'History' Spurs have got? Everton, a club that people currently mock, have way more history, both in years playing football and trophies won. Spurs are a joke of a club.
Click to expand...
You have to laugh at the whole notion that history only counts as history if you were dominating the game. Its been repeated so often that dumb fucks like o'hara actually think this way and million of opposition fans are the same. Its like saying Notts County have no history or Everton have no history because they haven't won anything in the last 40 years.

I had a book as a kid in the 80's with the history of City and then every game, line up, scorer, attendance etc listed for every season since we began. I spent months and months studying who played, how big our crowds were and what a rich history as a club we have. St Marks, 84k v Stoke, Billy Meredith, getting relegated after winning the league scoring 100 goals, Vienna, Newcastle away and so many more.

As soon as anyone mentions lack of history, its end of debate as there is literally no point talking to them.
 
East Level 2 said:
My main concern is that charges against Everton, and the threat by Leeds and another couple of relegated clubs to sue Everton or the PL, means it's more unlikely the PL will be allowed to let the charges against City sit in the corner and gather dust. I'm not suggesting we are guilty but that doesn't mean we won't be found guilty.
Click to expand...
The reality of the City case is that it won’t take place until discovery has been provided and all parties have ‘space in their diaries’.

All of City’s executives and the external legal team will suddenly have extremely full diaries for at least the next few years as there is absolutely zero logic in the earlier claims that City are ‘desperate to get this resolved asap’….no matter how solid you believe your case is, court/a tribunal is a crapshoot and so the longer they can stall it out the better.

No doubt they’ll be hoping the Qataris, Bahrainis and Kuwaitis buy up PL clubs and perhaps UAE announces a game changing strategic investment in the UK before diaries can be cleared.
 
pride in battle said:
What did the Brighton fans say ?
Click to expand...
The usual uninformed nonsense....All these City fans used to be reds. Ground bought for them. All down to money. I put up with it for about 100 metres then give to em with both barrels. I was fizzing and their arses dropped out. Then they became patronising but I was having none of it. They went quiet, mumbling between themselves until they were far enough away and then it was ALBION!
Southern shithouses.
 
Judge Roughneck said:
The usual uninformed nonsense....All these City fans used to be reds. Ground bought for them. All down to money. I put up with it for about 100 metres then give to em with both barrels. I was fizzing and their arses dropped out. Then they became patronising but I was having none of it. They went quiet, mumbling between themselves until they were far enough away and then it was ALBION!
Southern shithouses.
Click to expand...
I remember when Chelsea came into the money, I was glad as it upset the rags and Arsenal & pool, more competition, same with Newcastle, can't understand the logic talking shite like we were some tin pot team before the take over...
 
I woke up this morning and I heard few birds singing. Now I’m confused if should iron my shirt or not if I wear my jacket on top ?
 
willipp said:
You have to laugh at the whole notion that history only counts as history if you were dominating the game. Its been repeated so often that dumb fucks like o'hara actually think this way and million of opposition fans are the same. Its like saying Notts County have no history or Everton have no history because they haven't won anything in the last 40 years.

I had a book as a kid in the 80's with the history of City and then every game, line up, scorer, attendance etc listed for every season since we began. I spent months and months studying who played, how big our crowds were and what a rich history as a club we have. St Marks, 84k v Stoke, Billy Meredith, getting relegated after winning the league scoring 100 goals, Vienna, Newcastle away and so many more.

As soon as anyone mentions lack of history, its end of debate as there is literally no point talking to them.
Click to expand...
I am of an age where the Union Jack, the word "gay" and many other things had not been hijacked by sections of our community so using a truncated version of football "history" comes as no surprise.

Their masterpiece was to get "Fair" into FFP when the content was obviously Financially Unfair.
 
The premeir league have to tread carefully , if we are found guilty of any of their jumped up charges it will open a can of worms and you can 100% guarantee the Rags & Dippers will be straight onto their legal teams and the compenstaion they could achieve for our "tainted" titles , this could go on for years in court rooms, another reason why i think Richard Masters and his accomplices are hoping they can lose gallantly through a legal loop hole and sweep this load of bollocks under the nearest carpet
 
pride in battle said:
I remember when Chelsea came into the money, I was glad as it upset the rags and Arsenal & pool, more competition, same with Newcastle, can't understand the logic talking shite like we were some tin pot team before the take over...
Click to expand...
Even more can’t understand Everton fans on twitter banging on ‘what about citeh?!’. We’re on the same fucking team, why are you letting the red teams dictate what you can and can’t spend?
 
Judge Roughneck said:
The usual uninformed nonsense....All these City fans used to be reds.
Southern shithouses.
Click to expand...
Ironic really, considering that most of them changed their allegiance to the Cockney clubs when they nearly got relegated from the league and were playing at Priestfield and Withdean. They only came back when they got the shiny new stadium. As you say, Southern shithouses.
 
Sir Joe Aguero said:
Even more can’t understand Everton fans on twitter banging on ‘what about citeh?!’. We’re on the same fucking team, why are you letting the red teams dictate what you can and can’t spend?
Click to expand...
True but Everton also wanted to kill us with FFP. Didn't they also sign the "nasty 9" letter?
In many ways they deserve what comes their way. They wanted these rules when it looked like they might profit from they.
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
Give this team a 12 point deduction and watch them destroy all pretenders wanting to take our silverware away. It would be fucking glorious if they tried that and we ended up walking the premier league, they would invent something else to hang round our necks.
Click to expand...

you only get a 9 point deduction for going bust so 12 points for an overspend is just fantasy talk. It will be a financial fine and max 3 points deduction (if any)
 
BerkshireBlue said:
you only get a 9 point deduction for going bust so 12 points for an overspend is just fantasy talk. It will be a financial fine and max 3 points deduction (if any)
Click to expand...
I recall Portsmouth and Middlesbrough being deducted points but can't recall exactly what for.
Would be a bit ironic if Luton survived in the Premier league because of an Everton point deduction

I think Luton were hit with the biggest ever points deduction, 30 points.
 
Judge Roughneck said:
The usual uninformed nonsense....All these City fans used to be reds. Ground bought for them. All down to money. I put up with it for about 100 metres then give to em with both barrels. I was fizzing and their arses dropped out. Then they became patronising but I was having none of it. They went quiet, mumbling between themselves until they were far enough away and then it was ALBION!
Southern shithouses.
Click to expand...
Wrong ! all city fans used to be chelsea fans . ffs they can’t even get that right .
 
Jazzman said:
True but Everton also wanted to kill us with FFP. Didn't they also sign the "nasty 9" letter?
In many ways they deserve what comes their way. They wanted these rules when it looked like they might profit from they.
Click to expand...
No ^ hateful 9 that became hateful 8 after wolves fans told thier owners they didnt agree.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top