Ange has doubled Stevie G success at the very least. Also turned around Celtic and smashed his legacy.Spot on.
Was anyone suggesting Stevie G when he had a half decent start at Villa after success in Glasgow ?
Ange has doubled Stevie G success at the very least. Also turned around Celtic and smashed his legacy.Spot on.
Was anyone suggesting Stevie G when he had a half decent start at Villa after success in Glasgow ?
Unless you have proof and evidence Mancini was in the stadium when Hughes was sacked I suggest you withdraw your viewpoint and stop peddling that line. Otherwise you are doing the same thing we accuse the media and press of.Lol, okay.
None of that changes the way we replaced managers could have been better.
It’s well known that Mancini was in the stadium the day Hughes left. Maybe he wasn’t in the boardroom, but he was certainly around somewhere.
We get better managers each time, but hang the current ones out to dry.
Im not sure we will get better next time either!
@bluemanchesterOk, I don’t recall well enough to try to debate that. It still left Hughes as a dead man walking wherever Mancini was.
Try accepting you are wrong.
Correcting someone on the internet is serious business.Try accepting you are wrong.
I am not bickering I am pulling you up on something you stated as fact which has been proved many times as false. So withdraw your claim Mancini was in the stadium because if you were not certain he was you are as bad as the press and media that peddle their views.Correcting someone on the internet is serious business.
We dealt with the Hughes sacking poorly wherever Mancini was.
The fact you’re bickering over where he was seems important to you, so as I have already ceded that I don’t recall clearly, I will state that I am happy to take your word that he wasn’t in the stadium.
It doesn’t change very much though.
Have you read my two previous replies?I am not bickering I am pulling you up on something you stated as fact which has been proved many times as false. So withdraw your claim Mancini was in the stadium because if you were not certain he was you are as bad as the press and media that peddle their views.
Have you read my two previous replies?
Am I being clarkied
No your not been clarkied, you have been pulled up on a false claim whilst trying to put down our management, the best management team in world football In none of your 2 replies have you withdrawn your statement, do so now and it is over.Have you read my two previous replies?
Am I being clarkied here?
I will take your word that he wasn’t in the stadium the day that our board decided to sack our manager immediately after winning a game. Something that was common knowledge, but not confirmed.No your not been clarkied, you have been pulled up on a false claim whilst trying to put down our management, the best management team in world football In none of your 2 replies have you withdrawn your statement, do so now and it is over.
I really dont want you to take my word, it has been well documented he was not there. You claimed he was to belittle our management which for a City supporter is unbelievable after what they have done for our club. As someone with over 60k posts and a major contributor to Bluemoon you really have to withdraw your statement not use diversion tactics to claim you have when you certainly haven't.I will take your word that he wasn’t in the stadium the day that our board decided to sack our manager immediately after winning a game. Something that was common knowledge, but not confirmed.
I don’t believe we have changed managers well. I listed the reasons before. Leaving Hughes hanging like they did was poor.I really dont want you to take my word, it has been well documented he was not there. You claimed he was to belittle our management which for a City supporter is unbelievable after what they have done for our club. As someone with over 60k posts and a major contributor to Bluemoon you really have to withdraw your statement not use diversion tactics to claim you have when you certainly haven't.
I most certainly will retract you have over 60k posts when its only 40k+, a mistake made by rushing and posting on Bluemoon when I should be getting ready for tonights game.I don’t believe we have changed managers well. I listed the reasons before. Leaving Hughes hanging like they did was poor.
i accept that Mancini wasn’t in the stadium on that particular day. It doesn’t stop me thinking that the process of changing managers could have been much better than it was.
There are no diversion tactics. I genuinely believe that our board could change managers in a more holistic way.
I’d ask you to retract the 60k comment remark as being untrue, but I don’t really mind.
I love our owners. They’re superb. I’m not starting a crusade to get them out!I most certainly will retract you have over 60k posts when its only 40k+, a mistake made by rushing and posting on Bluemoon when I should be getting ready for tonights game.
I will follow your posts with a keen eye for any further transgressions;-)
Mancini was not in the stadium, hence the apology from the goons on Sunday supplement.Pretty sure it's since been established Mancini wasn't in the stadium.
You didn't irritate me at all, we are all on the same side, we all have different views, that's all it is. Must go now otherwise I'll be late arriving at the stadium.I love our owners. They’re superb. I’m not starting a crusade to get them out!
They aren’t totally perfect though!
I’m sorry if I’ve irritated you. It wasn’t intentional.
But he was in the UK. He stayed at Cook’s house.Pretty sure it's since been established Mancini wasn't in the stadium.
How many 5 years @blue61? That’s how long ago you posted this, anyone out there now we hadn’t thought of?3 years is an age in football, there will be new faces that we haven't even thought about by then. Whoever will need to carry on the DNA that has been in place for quite a few years now, playing entertaining football to try and win every match and ultimately trophies.