Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Another case of people who live in the West dictating what laws people in a different country should and should not have. Imposition of morals and culture. Wasn't that called "Colonialism" in the past?

Especially given this country effectively had Julian Assange locked up for years. (Not getting into the politics of all that).

The mail has cheered the removal of many of the rights to protest in this country too.
 
BBC being sneaky as per.....
A couple of paragraphs about Everton and then laying into the UAE and human rights
Well it's essentially two stories in one article. The references to human rights are a post script to the story that a banner was flown over the stadium in the 1st half demanding the release of Ahmed Mansoor.
 
Note the complete lack of media coverage today on our incorrectly ruled out goal. Can you imagine the difference if that was ruled out for the Dippers
Unfortunately it would never be ruled out for them especially more so after the poor decision at spurs,it’s payback time for the red scousers and this is the league’s way of reimbursing them,this will continue in games with favourable decisions and dodgy ones for the opposition,just like the good Dias goal yesterday being ruled out ..
 
Neville talking absolute bollocks on sky right now. The big six having a discussion on their own punishment regarding the super league breakaway. Well they were still part of the premier league. Then he adds who did they think they were. Well without those six clubs the premier league would have good as died.
 
Just watching the absolute twits on sly talking about Everton's charges. Not enough brains to blow their noses. Feel like my intelligence is draining watching the likes of ratty and dog botherer
 
Just watching the absolute twits on sly talking about Everton's charges. Not enough brains to blow their noses. Feel like my intelligence is draining watching the likes of ratty and dog botherer

The presenter has corrected them about three times now about mistakes they've made regarding the rules. These are the so called experts, no wonder brain dead football fans talk absolute bollocks regarding us listening to these clowns.
 
The presenter has corrected them about three times now about mistakes they've made regarding the rules. These are the so called experts, no wonder brain dead football fans talk absolute bollocks regarding us listening to these clowns.
Its akin to going back 50,000 years and asking a cavemen about the theory of gravity.
 
It happens every week. Those who control the narrative during or just after the game, on commentary, set the headline for the week and it is inevitably Neville and/or Carragher. 'Soft' penalty one week bought the card the next and the papers run with it for the week until the next game. Whether the scribblers and hacks have been doing the job too long and can't be arsed to come up with their own views (or write about what they saw), or whether they ever had that ability in the first place, is unclear.

And so we have this weeks gem. Ratboy reckons TAA is the new or better than KDB.

It's difficult to know where to start with this one. I understand, in truth, that there is very little for Liverpool to take away from this one, but lets look at the facts. Doku tore him a new one and he needed 2 or 3 covering him. Another 12 months under his belt and Doku would have tracked him back - Jack would have. TAA is an ok footballer but they couldn't find a position for him as he isn't a fullback, so the team has to suffer. He has been playing this 'hybrid' role for 5 mins and will get found out - meanwhile Kev has been the best creative midfielder for some years. To make the comparison is as insulting as it is ridiculous. He didn't have to think too long to come up with a motm - Bernie ran the game with some exquisite touches and intelligent play and was better defensively.

One thing is clear his dislike of us goes way above of his dislike of Liverpool.
Not to mention his pathetic attempt to stop Nathan with the goal. Watch it again it really is pub football level of defending.
 
The presenter has corrected them about three times now about mistakes they've made regarding the rules. These are the so called experts, no wonder brain dead football fans talk absolute bollocks regarding us listening to these clowns.
That's why I no longer pay for Sky.
The point is they are not the bloody experts.
The vast majority of Sky "experts/pundits" are there for controversy.
In fairness, Roy Keane says things that most of the others will not (e.g. how shite MUFC are).
But he is employed to say something dangerous/over the top.
Any sympathy Everton get, is because they are not currently a threat to the Red Shirts.
Also they are now the 10 point yardstick to measure City's many misdemeanors - 150 points deduction will probably be trotted out ?
Everton are a bit like when City were crap and everyone else loved the shite underdog...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top