PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

LeonardoDaVnci said:
The collective wisdom of BMF appears to suggest there are 129 charges not 115 and these map into 6 issues. I've applied my personal assessment of percentage weight/magnitude below. There's no doubt Ethihad Airways is critical.

Etihad Airways 65%
Etisalat 15%
Aabar 5%
Fordham Image rights 5%
Mancini contract 5%
Non cooperation 5%

How the PL lawyers attempt to reverse the vindication of Ethihad at CAS is baffling. It will have to include irrefutable proof of perjury in the Swiss Court by at least three witnesses.
Click to expand...
They all know that Arabs habitually cheat and lie.
 
Blue Pete said:
"The evidence before the court is incontrovertible there's no need for the jury to retire. In all my years of judging I have never heard before of someone more deserving of the full penalty of law."
Click to expand...
The way you made them suffer, scousers rags and gunners, fills me with the urge to defecate..
 
give it to gordon said:
As much as I believe City are 100% innocent, it's still baffles me the way the 115 chargers were issued.
The pl got this so wrong , the grass height for one lol.

It beggars belief that the pl seriously think City have broken 115 rules yet the pl could get the rules right for each season.

When the pl lose were does football go from there ?
The pl has falsely accused it's most successful club over the last decade on made up charges.
For this and this is the bit that niggles me, I cant see how City will be found innocent. For City to be found innocent it would be the end of the pl as it is clearly not fit for purpose.

Personally I believe we are innocent 100% but I cant believe the pl would risk everything just to throw shit at City

Perhaps this is the end game for the American owned clubs
Click to expand...
The only thing I think we could be guilty of is the Mancini business, which is ironic as that is the bit that is nothing to do with what the great unwashed rats think we are guilty of 115 ffp charges, as you state one of those charges is for grass that was too long, which is odd enough as a team that passes like us surely wouldn't want longer grass anyway lol

I want a not guilty so I can laugh at the wankers but I will be shocked to get one.
 
bluealf said:
The only thing I think we could be guilty of is the Mancini business, which is ironic as that is the bit that is nothing to do with what the great unwashed rats think we are guilty of 115 ffp charges, as you state one of those charges is for grass that was too long, which is odd enough as a team that passes like us surely wouldn't want longer grass anyway lol

I want a not guilty so I can laugh at the wankers but I will be shocked to get one.
Click to expand...
Didn’t we play Liverpool in the cup not so long ago and klopp complained about the length of the grass? So obvious were the source of these “charges” come from
 
Last edited:
KS55 said:
I would not have any objection to a club or even the press campaigning legitimately for less spending. Problems arise when the methods are underhand whether in framing the rules (G14 and refusal to accept restraint on debt) or in trying to nobble rivals with lies, innuendo and spying.
Click to expand...
Whenever someone says to me 'It's not fair, City can spend whatever they like and it's ruining football' etc. I always say: 'It wasn't seen as quite an issue when your club/LFC/MUFC/Arsenal dominated football and could spend what they like so why is it an issue to you now?' If they continue down the path of 'it's ruining football' then I add: 'There are lots of ways of controlling spending in football and ensuring competitive balance such as wage controls/salary caps, limit transfer fees, instigate a draft system or whatever, all of which would be fairer to ALL than penalising investment. Ask your club to push for those controls if you genuinely want football to be fairer and not based on the biggest or richest clubs spending most.'

Ultimately, dominant clubs want to remain dominant and if they can't compete they'll try to penalise or nobble those that can.
 
The PL is basically eating itself. would not be surprised in the slightest if the ESL happens within 5.

Honestly wouldnt mind if it does at this stage...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top