United Thread - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kinkladze's crazy skills said:
Self entitled glory hunting bastards who can't take that the team they chose isn't succeeding or is losing badly when it's too late to switch, kids are easily swayed and most of those kids in the early to mid 90s grew up to be no nowt c***s spouting nited this nited that, hate everything about them when in primary school aged roughly 6 in the lead up to a derby around 1992/93, my classroom was asked a simple question by the teacher which side do you support?

It was a near 50/50 split in my class and I'm not even slightly joking when I say there was actually more blues than rags in that class, yet within 3 years due to their success and the media propaganda love in me and two others were the only blues left. Plenty have took the piss over the years but I refused to care this was and always has been the mentality of the self entitled brigade, to belittle anyone the my dad is harder/better than yours shite but on steroids, lasting into adulthood thinking likkle City would never challenge and always be a laughing stock well they aren't laughing now. They started following the rags for one reason and one reason only that reason was purely success driven, they wanted to be a part of something classed as the best they instead mostly grew up to be arrogant bunch of tossers.

Now that it's easier than ever to break into the top 4-6 for other teams if they spend very wisely over the course of 3/5/10 years, that's the mardarses issue it's more of a level playing field to build yourself up and then bring in the factor they've spent disastrously for the past decade, then that they don't look they'll be getting better at wasting their money anytime soon that's the real reason for the the Andy Tate's of this world. The spoilt bastards I know like Tate they've all more or less "fallen out of love with football' because of it becoming all about the money... Absolute bollocks it's always been about spending money if a club is ran right, if they spend very wisely near the top of the biggest spenders table odds are they will win the most.

Never forget that those bastards in 1989 when we beat them in the 5-1 had the most expensively assembled team in English football history, they carried on spending until they finally won a title which with the the new prem money made them quite unstoppable, yet our spending and Chelsea's spending plus since the mega money came to other teams who spend more wisely, all while they're pissing away theirs for over a decade with a decaying stadium to boot they just can't take it anymore it's not fair at all, they can't take not winning and much worse in their heads they know they're years off challenging even if they spend well.

If they carry on spending badly they'll need to tighten the purse strings soon and I love that wholeheartedly I can only hope that this is, despite the childish tantrums of Tate and co thinking otherwise the very beginning of their total demise.
I've always found it funny how they didn't give a toss when other teams couldn't compete with their spending, back when their insane transfer budget was nearly the same size as the rest of the league combined, even if they didn't win a league they'd break transfer records to but it back again.

These entitled simpletons who claim to be their fans deserve a couple relegations to truly humble them, even then I very much doubt they'd be humbled as most have disgusting attitudes in general, hopefully I'll see them really suffer someday I'm sure we'd all die a very happy if we ever saw those clowns get relegated, rock bottom my arse there's plenty more to fall for that lot bring on relegations for the fuckers then I'll truly die a happy man.
Click to expand...
Excellent post, sir. Excellent.

I haven't discussed football with any rag fan for a long, long time now, and I have no intention of changing that in the foreseeable future. They have joined the dippers and become social pariahs in my mind, collectively persona-non-grata.

I've got Arsenal fans, Spurs fans, and a couple of Brighton season ticket holders living near me that I talk to periodically: decent people, genuine fans who know their stuff - particularly about their own clubs.
They never give me stick about 'oil-money,' or Arabs, or anything that might cause offence. To a man they've said the same thing regarding our takeover: "Wish it had been us."
The contrast with the plastic rags I see now again is amazing. They've never been to the swamp, never actually seen the players in real life, just Sly/MotD etc. They know nothing about the rags' history prior to the Pisscan's arrival, they had never heard about the dodgy meat, or the looking-under-toilet-doors thing. One of them admitted he'd never even heard of Gordon McQueen - and this man is in his early 60's. You don't expect all supporters to know everything about their chosen club, but you'd think they would have at least a working knowledge of the clubs' history and some of their star players' names.

I no longer have the patience to talk football with these people. It's utterly futile.
 
KentBlue said:
Excellent post, sir. Excellent.

I haven't discussed football with any rag fan for a long, long time now, and I have no intention of changing that in the foreseeable future. They have joined the dippers and become social pariahs in my mind, collectively persona-non-grata.

I've got Arsenal fans, Spurs fans, and a couple of Brighton season ticket holders living near me that I talk to periodically: decent people, genuine fans who know their stuff - particularly about their own clubs.
They never give me stick about 'oil-money,' or Arabs, or anything that might cause offence. To a man they've said the same thing regarding our takeover: "Wish it had been us."
The contrast with the plastic rags I see now again is amazing. They've never been to the swamp, never actually seen the players in real life, just Sly/MotD etc. They know nothing about the rags' history prior to the Pisscan's arrival, they had never heard about the dodgy meat, or the looking-under-toilet-doors thing. One of them admitted he'd never even heard of Gordon McQueen - and this man is in his early 60's. You don't expect all supporters to know everything about their chosen club, but you'd think they would have at least a working knowledge of the clubs' history and some of their star players' names.

I no longer have the patience to talk football with these people. It's utterly futile.
Click to expand...
Likewise.

We have a Dipper's fan in our office who has done nothing but blather on about being 'top of the league la' all f*cking day.

I've given him a thorough ignoring.
 
Aw bless, sky have got their comfort blanket out for egghead.

'McTominay: Man Utd no longer toxic under Ten Hag'

www.skysports.com

Scott McTominay says toxicity at Man Utd is no longer an issue under Erik ten Hag

Manchester United must beat Bayern Munich at home on Tuesday and hope Galatasaray draw at FC Copenhagen to qualify out of Group A in the Champions League; United then face Liverpool at Anfield in the Premier League on Sunday, live on Sky Sports Premier League and Main Event
www.skysports.com www.skysports.com

And they got bumfluff face in as well to rally the troops and calm the red mardarse pricks down.
'Neville: Man Utd should not sack Ten Hag | 'It's an absolute nonsense''

www.skysports.com

Gary Neville: Man Utd should not sack Ten Hag | 'It's an absolute nonsense'

Gary Neville believes despite Manchester Uniteds tumultuous start to their Premier League campaign, the club still shouldnt sack manager Erik ten Hag.
www.skysports.com www.skysports.com

Aw.
 
KentBlue said:
Excellent post, sir. Excellent.

I haven't discussed football with any rag fan for a long, long time now, and I have no intention of changing that in the foreseeable future. They have joined the dippers and become social pariahs in my mind, collectively persona-non-grata.

I've got Arsenal fans, Spurs fans, and a couple of Brighton season ticket holders living near me that I talk to periodically: decent people, genuine fans who know their stuff - particularly about their own clubs.
They never give me stick about 'oil-money,' or Arabs, or anything that might cause offence. To a man they've said the same thing regarding our takeover: "Wish it had been us."
The contrast with the plastic rags I see now again is amazing. They've never been to the swamp, never actually seen the players in real life, just Sly/MotD etc. They know nothing about the rags' history prior to the Pisscan's arrival, they had never heard about the dodgy meat, or the looking-under-toilet-doors thing. One of them admitted he'd never even heard of Gordon McQueen - and this man is in his early 60's. You don't expect all supporters to know everything about their chosen club, but you'd think they would have at least a working knowledge of the clubs' history and some of their star players' names.

I no longer have the patience to talk football with these people. It's utterly futile.
Click to expand...
Yes it was a very good post which hit the nail on the head with so many points...
This will be City in another 15 or 20 years if the success continues as it has done.. these gloryhunter.. Out of Town and. Foreign leeches will suck the life out of your local fanbase like it did with United and Liverpool before.. its enevitable.. it will only end one way.. it’s called the price of success..
 
I've obviously missed something, but why do the ex rags and their supporter podcasts continually refer to themselves by their full title rather than just "United"?

I can understand when Neville or Ferdinand are on National TV, but I've just watched the ex hooligan Tony O'Neill (who sounds surprisingly mature and articulate) being interviewed by his Son (who sounds like he's on commission for every time he calls them "Manchester United") on a You Tube podcast that's obviously aimed at the rags fanbase
It actually gets quite irritating, and even in the comments section, people are asking why he doesn't just call them "United"
 
Scaring Europe to Death said:
I've obviously missed something, but why do the ex rags and their supporter podcasts continually refer to themselves by their full title rather than just "United"?

I can understand when Neville or Ferdinand are on National TV, but I've just watched the ex hooligan Tony O'Neill (who sounds surprisingly mature and articulate) being interviewed by his Son (who sounds like he's on commission for every time he calls them "Manchester United") on a You Tube podcast that's obviously aimed at the rags fanbase
It actually gets quite irritating, and even in the comments section, people are asking why he doesn't just call them "United"
Click to expand...
It's because they're not actually from Manchester
 
Scaring Europe to Death said:
I've obviously missed something, but why do the ex rags and their supporter podcasts continually refer to themselves by their full title rather than just "United"?

I can understand when Neville or Ferdinand are on National TV, but I've just watched the ex hooligan Tony O'Neill (who sounds surprisingly mature and articulate) being interviewed by his Son (who sounds like he's on commission for every time he calls them "Manchester United") on a You Tube podcast that's obviously aimed at the rags fanbase
It actually gets quite irritating, and even in the comments section, people are asking why he doesn't just call them "United"
Click to expand...
They want to hold on the myth that they are "manchester" united even though they only play once in Manchester per season.

More worrying is that any blue is watching united podcasts on YouTube.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top